These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27595716)

  • 1. Dentoskeletal Effects of the Modified Tandem Appliance vs the Facemask Appliance in the Treatment of Skeletal Class III Malocclusion: A Single-center, Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Husson AH; Burhan AS; Salma FB; Nawaya FR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):522-9. PubMed ID: 27595716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dentoskeletal effects of the Bite-Jumping Appliance and the Twin-Block Appliance in the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
    Burhan AS; Nawaya FR
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 37(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 25296729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of maxillary protraction with alternating rapid palatal expansion and constriction vs expansion alone in maxillary retrusive patients: a single-center, randomized controlled trial.
    Liu W; Zhou Y; Wang X; Liu D; Zhou S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Oct; 148(4):641-51. PubMed ID: 26432320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.
    Ucem TT; Ucuncü N; Yüksel S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):672-9. PubMed ID: 15592214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dentoskeletal effects of facemask therapy in skeletal Class III cleft patients with or without bone graft.
    Zhang Y; Jia H; Fu Z; Huang Y; Wang Z; Guo R; Shen J; Li W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):542-549. PubMed ID: 29602346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of double-plate appliance/facemask combination and facemask therapy in treating class III malocclusions.
    Gencer D; Kaygisiz E; Yüksel S; Tortop T
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar; 85(2):278-83. PubMed ID: 24913739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modified tandem traction bow appliance compared with facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.
    Tortop T; Kaygisiz E; Gencer D; Yuksel S; Atalay Z
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jul; 84(4):642-8. PubMed ID: 24274958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment.
    Ngan P; Wilmes B; Drescher D; Martin C; Weaver B; Gunel E
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():26. PubMed ID: 26303311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reverse Forsus vs. facemask/rapid palatal expansion appliances in growing subjects with mild class III malocclusions : A randomized controlled clinical study.
    Yavan MA; Gulec A; Orhan M
    J Orofac Orthop; 2023 Jan; 84(1):20-32. PubMed ID: 34269826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short-term effects of a modified Alt-RAMEC protocol for early treatment of Class III malocclusion: a controlled study.
    Masucci C; Franchi L; Giuntini V; Defraia E
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2014 Nov; 17(4):259-69. PubMed ID: 25041370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cephalometric effects of Pushing Splints 3 compared with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy in Class III malocclusion children: a randomized controlled trial.
    Galeotti A; Martina S; Viarani V; Franchi L; Rongo R; D'Antò V; Festa P
    Eur J Orthod; 2021 Jun; 43(3):274-282. PubMed ID: 33313718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dentofacial effects of skeletal anchored treatment modalities for the correction of maxillary retrognathia.
    Sar C; Sahinoğlu Z; Özçirpici AA; Uçkan S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 24373654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment with facemask and removable upper appliance versus modified tandem traction bow appliance: the effects on mandibular space.
    Tortop T; Kaygisiz E; Erkun S; Yuksel S
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jul; 40(4):372-377. PubMed ID: 29059295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cephalometric changes after the correction of class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion/facemask therapy.
    Macdonald KE; Kapust AJ; Turley PK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 10393575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative assessment of orthodontic treatment outcomes of mild skeletal Class III malocclusion between facemask and facemask in combination with a miniscrew for anchorage in growing patients:
    Seiryu M; Ida H; Mayama A; Sasaki S; Sasaki S; Deguchi T; Takano-Yamamoto T
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Jan; 90(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 31398066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term effects produced by early treatment of Class III malocclusion with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask followed by fixed appliances: A multicentre retro-prospective controlled study.
    Rutili V; Souki BQ; Nieri M; Carlos ALFM; Pavoni C; Cozza P; McNamara JA; Giuntini V; Franchi L
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2024 Jun; 27(3):429-438. PubMed ID: 38146808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of maxillary protraction for early correction of class III malocclusion.
    Celikoglu M; Oktay H
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Feb; 36(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 23460730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxillary protraction appliance.
    Altug Z; Arslan AD
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 16637712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cephalometric changes of pushing splints 3 compared to rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy on the airway space in class III growing patients: A randomized clinical trial.
    Galeotti A; Viarani V; Franchi L; Martina S; Rongo R; D'Antò V; Uomo R; Aristei F; Festa P
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2024 Aug; 27(4):552-559. PubMed ID: 38366756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the modified maxillary protractor applied to Class III malocclusion with retruded maxilla in early mixed dentition.
    Kajiyama K; Murakami T; Suzuki A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):549-59. PubMed ID: 11094369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.