These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27595793)

  • 21. Cognition and aided speech recognition in noise: specific role for cognitive factors following nine-week experience with adjusted compression settings in hearing aids.
    Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
    Scand J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 50(5):405-18. PubMed ID: 19778388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cortical encoding of speech acoustics: Effects of noise and amplification.
    Kuruvilla-Mathew A; Purdy SC; Welch D
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(11):852-64. PubMed ID: 26203722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of Age and Working Memory Capacity on Speech Recognition Performance in Noise Among Listeners With Normal Hearing.
    Gordon-Salant S; Cole SS
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):593-602. PubMed ID: 27232071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Do hearing loss and cognitive function modulate benefit from different binaural noise-reduction settings?
    Neher T; Grimm G; Hohmann V; Kollmeier B
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):e52-62. PubMed ID: 24351610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of Gated Audiovisual Speech Identification in Elderly Hearing Aid Users and Elderly Normal-Hearing Individuals: Effects of Adding Visual Cues to Auditory Speech Stimuli.
    Moradi S; Lidestam B; Rönnberg J
    Trends Hear; 2016 Jun; 20():. PubMed ID: 27317667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Acceptable noise level (ANL) with Danish and non-semantic speech materials in adult hearing-aid users.
    Olsen SØ; Lantz J; Nielsen LH; Brännström KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):678-88. PubMed ID: 22731922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Benefit from non-linear frequency compression hearing aids in a clinical setting: the effects of duration of experience and severity of high-frequency hearing loss.
    Hopkins K; Khanom M; Dickinson AM; Munro KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Apr; 53(4):219-28. PubMed ID: 24617592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Pitch and lexical tone perception of bilingual English-Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant recipients, hearing aid users, and normally hearing listeners.
    Looi V; Teo ER; Loo J
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S91-S104. PubMed ID: 26561892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of linguistic context and noise type on speech comprehension.
    Fitzgerald LP; DeDe G; Shen J
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1345619. PubMed ID: 38375107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Noise reduction improves memory for target language speech in competing native but not foreign language speech.
    Ng EH; Rudner M; Lunner T; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 25166628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. New perspectives on assessing amplification effects.
    Souza PE; Tremblay KL
    Trends Amplif; 2006 Sep; 10(3):119-43. PubMed ID: 16959734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use.
    Ng EH; Classon E; Larsby B; Arlinger S; Lunner T; Rudner M; Rönnberg J
    Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25421088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effects of frequency lowering on speech perception in noise with adult hearing-aid users.
    Miller CW; Bates E; Brennan M
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(5):305-12. PubMed ID: 26938846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hearing aid accessories for adults: the remote FM microphone.
    Boothroyd A
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 14770015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Speech discrimination with an 8-channel compression hearing aid and conventional aids in background of speech-band noise.
    Yund EW; Simon HJ; Efron R
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):161-80. PubMed ID: 3430375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Auditory Perceptual Exercises in Adults Adapting to the Use of Hearing Aids.
    Karah H; Karawani H
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():832100. PubMed ID: 35664209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Enhanced Speechreading Performance in Young Hearing Aid Users in China.
    Lei J; Gong H; Chen L
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Feb; 62(2):307-317. PubMed ID: 30950700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Acclimatization in wide dynamic range multichannel compression and linear amplification hearing aids.
    Yund EW; Roup CM; Simon HJ; Bowman GA
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2006; 43(4):517-36. PubMed ID: 17123191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Valby Project. A survey of the hearing in the elderly > or = 80 years of age-provided with hearing aids.
    Bech B; Christensen B; Parving A
    Scand Audiol; 1996; 25(4):247-52. PubMed ID: 8975996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.