These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27596682)

  • 21. Influence of Implant Neck Surface and Placement Depth on Crestal Bone Changes Around Platform-Switched Implants: A Clinical and Radiographic Study in Dogs.
    Valles C; Rodríguez-Ciurana X; Nart J; Santos A; Galofre M; Tarnow D
    J Periodontol; 2017 Nov; 88(11):1200-1210. PubMed ID: 28708038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Submerged or non-submerged healing of endosseous implants to be used in the rehabilitation of partially dentate patients.
    Cecchinato D; Olsson C; Lindhe J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 31(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 15016259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Spontaneous early exposure of submerged endosseous implants resulting in crestal bone loss: a clinical evaluation between stage I and stage II surgery.
    Tal H; Artzi Z; Moses O; Nemcovsky CE; Kozlovsky A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(4):514-21. PubMed ID: 11515998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The influence of soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around implants: a 1-year prospective controlled clinical trial.
    Linkevicius T; Apse P; Grybauskas S; Puisys A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):712-9. PubMed ID: 19885413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Effects of Subcrestal Implant Placement on Crestal Bone Levels and Bone-to-Abutment Contact: A Microcomputed Tomographic and Histologic Study in Dogs.
    Fetner M; Fetner A; Koutouzis T; Clozza E; Tovar N; Sarendranath A; Coelho PG; Neiva K; Janal MN; Neiva R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(5):1068-75. PubMed ID: 26394343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of peri-implant marginal bone loss using modified abutment connections at various crestal level placements.
    Veis A; Parissis N; Tsirlis A; Papadeli C; Marinis G; Zogakis A
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2010 Dec; 30(6):609-17. PubMed ID: 20967307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Crestal bone loss related to immediate implants in crestal and subcrestal position: a pilot study in dogs.
    Calvo-Guirado JL; López-López PJ; Mate Sanchez JE; Gargallo Albiol J; Velasco Ortega E; Delgado Ruiz R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Nov; 25(11):1286-1294. PubMed ID: 24118345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Feasibility and influence of the microgap of two implants placed in a non-submerged procedure: a five-year follow-up clinical trial.
    Heijdenrijk K; Raghoebar GM; Meijer HJ; Stegenga B; van der Reijden WA
    J Periodontol; 2006 Jun; 77(6):1051-60. PubMed ID: 16734581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bone level alterations at implants placed in the posterior segments of the dentition: outcome of submerged/non-submerged healing. A 5-year multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Cecchinato D; Bengazi F; Blasi G; Botticelli D; Cardarelli I; Gualini F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Apr; 19(4):429-31. PubMed ID: 18266872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of abutment connections and plaque control on the initial healing of prematurely exposed implants: an experimental study in dogs.
    Jeong SM; Choi BH; Li J; Kim HS; Ko CY; Lee SH
    J Periodontol; 2008 Jun; 79(6):1070-4. PubMed ID: 18533785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants: a methodologic study comparing linear radiographic with histometric measurements.
    Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Nummikoski PV; Buser D; Schenk RK; Cochran DL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(4):475-85. PubMed ID: 11515994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Crestal bone changes around implants with reduced abutment diameter placed non-submerged and at subcrestal positions: a 1-year radiographic evaluation.
    Donovan R; Fetner A; Koutouzis T; Lundgren T
    J Periodontol; 2010 Mar; 81(3):428-34. PubMed ID: 20192870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Soft tissue and crestal bone changes around implants with platform-switched abutments placed nonsubmerged at subcrestal position: a 2-year clinical and radiographic evaluation.
    Aimetti M; Ferrarotti F; Mariani GM; Ghelardoni C; Romano F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1369-77. PubMed ID: 26478966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Biological width establishment around dental implants is influenced by abutment height irrespective of vertical mucosal thickness: A cluster randomized controlled trial.
    Spinato S; Stacchi C; Lombardi T; Bernardello F; Messina M; Zaffe D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Jul; 30(7):649-659. PubMed ID: 31033035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A randomized controlled clinical trial to assess crestal bone remodeling of four different implant designs.
    Glibert M; Vervaeke S; Jacquet W; Vermeersch K; Östman PO; De Bruyn H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Aug; 20(4):455-462. PubMed ID: 29575488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of Platform Shift/Switch on Crestal Bone Levels and Mucosal Profile Following Flapless Surgery and Crestal/Subcrestal Implant Placement.
    Lee J; Fiorini T; Gamborena I; Wenzel BA; Schüpbach P; Wikesjö UM; Susin C
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 18(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 24889401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Maryland-bridge application as a suitable technique to preserve marginal bone level of not-submerged supracrestal implants.
    Azizi A; Zamparini F; Spinelli A; Pirani C; Gandolfi MG; Prati C
    Minerva Stomatol; 2020 Dec; 69(6):335-342. PubMed ID: 33393275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Marginal Bone Changes around Platform-Switching Implants Placed in Crestal or Subcrestal Positions: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Kütan E; Bolukbasi N; Yildirim-Ondur E; Ozdemir T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():e364-75. PubMed ID: 25041252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Crestal Bone Loss under Delayed Loading of Full Thickness Versus Flapless Surgically Placed Dental Implants in Controlled Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Parallel Group Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Yadav R; Agrawal KK; Rao J; Anwar M; Alvi HA; Singh K; Himanshu D
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Aug; 27(7):611-617. PubMed ID: 27731955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A radiographic evaluation of unloaded nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible.
    Hermann JS; Cochran DL; Nummikoski PV; Buser D
    J Periodontol; 1997 Nov; 68(11):1117-30. PubMed ID: 9407406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.