These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27596798)

  • 1. National Surgical Quality Improvement Program integration with Morbidity and Mortality conference is essential to success in the march to zero.
    Gurien LA; Ra JH; Kerwin AJ; Nussbaum MS; Crandall M; deVilla J; Tepas JJ
    Am J Surg; 2016 Oct; 212(4):623-628. PubMed ID: 27596798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identification of surgical complications and deaths: an assessment of the traditional surgical morbidity and mortality conference compared with the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
    Hutter MM; Rowell KS; Devaney LA; Sokal SM; Warshaw AL; Abbott WM; Hodin RA
    J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Nov; 203(5):618-24. PubMed ID: 17084322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perioperative outcomes for pediatric neurosurgical procedures: analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatrics.
    Kuo BJ; Vissoci JR; Egger JR; Smith ER; Grant GA; Haglund MM; Rice HE
    J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2017 Mar; 19(3):361-371. PubMed ID: 28059679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identifying Adverse Events in Pediatric Surgery: Comparing Morbidity and Mortality Conference with the NSQIP-Pediatric System.
    Cromeens BP; Lisciandro RE; Brilli RJ; Askegard-Giesmann JR; Kenney BD; Besner GE
    J Am Coll Surg; 2017 May; 224(5):945-953. PubMed ID: 28235646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of Structured Presentation Formatting and NSQIP Guidelines Improves Quality of Surgical Morbidity and Mortality Conference.
    Endicott KM; Zettervall SL; Rettig RL; Patel N; Buckley L; Sidawy A; Knoll S; Vaziri K
    J Surg Res; 2019 Jan; 233():118-123. PubMed ID: 30502237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding Quality Issues in Your Surgical Department: Comparing the ACS NSQIP With Traditional Morbidity and Mortality Conferences in a Canadian Academic Hospital.
    Auspitz M; Cleghorn MC; Tse A; Sockalingam S; Quereshy FA; Okrainec A; Jackson TD
    J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(6):1272-7. PubMed ID: 26119095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring surgical quality: comparison of postoperative adverse events with the american college of surgeons NSQIP and the Thoracic Morbidity and Mortality classification system.
    Ivanovic J; Seely AJ; Anstee C; Villeneuve PJ; Gilbert S; Maziak DE; Shamji FM; Forster AJ; Sundaresan RS
    J Am Coll Surg; 2014 May; 218(5):1024-31. PubMed ID: 24661854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Association of hospital participation in a surgical outcomes monitoring program with inpatient complications and mortality.
    Etzioni DA; Wasif N; Dueck AC; Cima RR; Hohmann SF; Naessens JM; Mathur AK; Habermann EB
    JAMA; 2015 Feb; 313(5):505-11. PubMed ID: 25647206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Change in Adverse Events After Enrollment in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Montroy J; Breau RH; Cnossen S; Witiuk K; Binette A; Ferrier T; Lavallée LT; Fergusson DA; Schramm D
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146254. PubMed ID: 26812596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of risk adjustment methodologies in surgical quality improvement.
    Steinberg SM; Popa MR; Michalek JA; Bethel MJ; Ellison EC
    Surgery; 2008 Oct; 144(4):662-7; discussion 662-7. PubMed ID: 18847652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Increasing reporting of adverse events to improve the educational value of the morbidity and mortality conference.
    McVeigh TP; Waters PS; Murphy R; O'Donoghue GT; McLaughlin R; Kerin MJ
    J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Jan; 216(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 23127791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How best to measure surgical quality? Comparison of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators (AHRQ-PSI) and the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) postoperative adverse events at a single institution.
    Cima RR; Lackore KA; Nehring SA; Cassivi SD; Donohue JH; Deschamps C; Vansuch M; Naessens JM
    Surgery; 2011 Nov; 150(5):943-9. PubMed ID: 21875734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing performance of Morbidity and Mortality Conference and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for detection of complications after urologic surgery.
    Miller DC; Filson CP; Wallner LP; Montie JE; Campbell DA; Wei JT
    Urology; 2006 Nov; 68(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17113882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What Happened to the Complication? The Importance of ACS NSQIP Pediatric in Optimizing Quality Improvement Initiatives for Resident Education.
    Calder BW; Sakran JV; Streck CJ; Cina RA
    J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(3):431-436. PubMed ID: 28089474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the Tennessee Surgical Quality Collaborative to improve surgical outcomes.
    Guillamondegui OD; Gunter OL; Hines L; Martin BJ; Gibson W; Clarke PC; Cecil WT; Cofer JB
    J Am Coll Surg; 2012 Apr; 214(4):709-14; discussion 714-6. PubMed ID: 22265639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison between clinical registry and medicare claims data on the classification of hospital quality of surgical care.
    Lawson EH; Zingmond DS; Hall BL; Louie R; Brook RH; Ko CY
    Ann Surg; 2015 Feb; 261(2):290-6. PubMed ID: 25569029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Successful implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the private sector: the Patient Safety in Surgery study.
    Khuri SF; Henderson WG; Daley J; Jonasson O; Jones RS; Campbell DA; Fink AS; Mentzer RM; Neumayer L; Hammermeister K; Mosca C; Healey N;
    Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):329-36. PubMed ID: 18650645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How slow is too slow? Correlation of operative time to complications: an analysis from the Tennessee Surgical Quality Collaborative.
    Daley BJ; Cecil W; Clarke PC; Cofer JB; Guillamondegui OD
    J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Apr; 220(4):550-8. PubMed ID: 25728140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Apples and oranges: comparison of ACS-NSQIP observed outcomes with premier's quality manager-predicted outcomes.
    Lee LC; Reines HD; Sheridan MJ; Farmer BE; Martin J; Duan M
    Am J Med Qual; 2011; 26(6):474-9. PubMed ID: 21835812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of patient registries in breast surgery: a comparison of the tracking operations and outcomes for plastic surgeons and national surgical quality improvement program data sets.
    Khavanin N; Gutowski KA; Hume KM; Simmons CJ; Mlodinow AS; Weiss M; Mayer KE; Murphy RX; Kim JY
    Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Feb; 74(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 25590251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.