356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27597512)
1. Laminectomy and fusion versus laminoplasty for the treatment of degenerative cervical myelopathy: results from the AOSpine North America and International prospective multicenter studies.
Fehlings MG; Santaguida C; Tetreault L; Arnold P; Barbagallo G; Defino H; Kale S; Zhou Q; Yoon TS; Kopjar B
Spine J; 2017 Jan; 17(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 27597512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Geographic variations in clinical presentation and outcomes of decompressive surgery in patients with symptomatic degenerative cervical myelopathy: analysis of a prospective, international multicenter cohort study of 757 patients.
Fehlings MG; Kopjar B; Ibrahim A; Tetreault LA; Arnold PM; Defino H; Kale SS; Yoon ST; Barbagallo GM; Bartels RHM; Zhou Q; Vaccaro AR; Zileli M; Tan G; Yukawa Y; Brodke DS; Shaffrey CI; Santos de Moraes O; Woodard EJ; Scerrati M; Tanaka M; Toyone T; Sasso RC; Janssen ME; Gokaslan ZL; Alvarado M; Bolger C; Bono CM; Dekutoski MB
Spine J; 2018 Apr; 18(4):593-605. PubMed ID: 28888674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laminoplasty Does not Lead to Worsening Axial Neck Pain in the Properly Selected Patient With Cervical Myelopathy: A Comparison With Laminectomy and Fusion.
Stephens BF; Rhee JM; Neustein TM; Arceo R
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Dec; 42(24):1844-1850. PubMed ID: 28658033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surgical Outcomes Following Laminectomy With Fusion Versus Laminectomy Alone in Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.
Kotter MRN; Tetreault L; Badhiwala JH; Wilson JR; Arnold PM; Bartels R; Barbagallo G; Kopiar B; Fehlings MG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Dec; 45(24):1696-1703. PubMed ID: 32890295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Treatment of cervical stenotic myelopathy: a cost and outcome comparison of laminoplasty versus laminectomy and lateral mass fusion.
Highsmith JM; Dhall SS; Haid RW; Rodts GE; Mummaneni PV
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 21388285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion for the treatment of spondylotic cervical myelopathy: short-term follow-up.
Blizzard DJ; Caputo AM; Sheets CZ; Klement MR; Michael KW; Isaacs RE; Brown CR
Eur Spine J; 2017 Jan; 26(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 27554354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy and safety of surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results of the AOSpine North America prospective multi-center study.
Fehlings MG; Wilson JR; Kopjar B; Yoon ST; Arnold PM; Massicotte EM; Vaccaro AR; Brodke DS; Shaffrey CI; Smith JS; Woodard EJ; Banco RJ; Chapman JR; Janssen ME; Bono CM; Sasso RC; Dekutoski MB; Gokaslan ZL
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Sep; 95(18):1651-8. PubMed ID: 24048552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Comparison of the Surgical Outcomes of Laminoplasty and Laminectomy with Fusion in the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Benek B; Akcay E; Yilmaz H; Aydin M; Yurt A
Turk Neurosurg; 2021; 31(4):530-537. PubMed ID: 33759164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Outcomes of Surgical Treatment for Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Versus Other Forms of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Results from the Prospective, Multicenter AOSpine CSM-International Study of 479 Patients.
Nakashima H; Tetreault L; Nagoshi N; Nouri A; Arnold P; Yukawa Y; Toyone T; Tanaka M; Zhou Q; Fehlings MG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Mar; 98(5):370-8. PubMed ID: 26935459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical laminoplasty versus laminectomy and posterior cervical fusion for cervical myelopathy: propensity-matched analysis of 24-month outcomes from the Quality Outcomes Database.
Yang E; Mummaneni PV; Chou D; Bydon M; Bisson EF; Shaffrey CI; Gottfried ON; Asher AL; Coric D; Potts EA; Foley KT; Wang MY; Fu KM; Virk MS; Knightly JJ; Meyer S; Park P; Upadhyaya CD; Shaffrey ME; Buchholz AL; Tumialán LM; Turner JD; Michalopoulos GD; Sherrod BA; Agarwal N; Haid RW; Chan AK
J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Nov; 39(5):671-681. PubMed ID: 37728378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Selective blocking laminoplasty in cervical laminectomy and fusion to prevent postoperative C5 palsy.
Kim GU; Lee GW
Spine J; 2019 Apr; 19(4):617-623. PubMed ID: 30414991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy and Safety of Surgery for Mild Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Results of the AOSpine North America and International Prospective Multicenter Studies.
Badhiwala JH; Witiw CD; Nassiri F; Akbar MA; Mansouri A; Wilson JR; Fehlings MG
Neurosurgery; 2019 Apr; 84(4):890-897. PubMed ID: 29684181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes and Related Factors of C5 Palsy Following Cervical Laminectomy With Instrumented Fusion Compared With Laminoplasty.
Lee SH; Suk KS; Kang KC; Cho SW; Juh HS; Lee JH; Kim KT
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 May; 41(10):E574-9. PubMed ID: 26650877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing Spinal Cord Drift, Clinical Outcomes and C5 Palsy in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Study of Cervical Laminoplasty Versus Laminectomy/Fusion.
Basu S; Gohil K
Global Spine J; 2024 Feb; ():21925682241235608. PubMed ID: 38387865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Plate-only open-door laminoplasty is associated with durable, significantly improved clinical outcomes and a very low reoperation rate for progressive spondylosis or adjacent segment disease: average 8-year follow-up.
Xiao AX; Bellamy JT; Webb AR; Ojemakinde A; Chao M; Niu S; Rhee JM
Spine J; 2024 Mar; 24(3):417-423. PubMed ID: 37844629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is laminectomy and fusion the better choice than laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy with signal changes on magnetic resonance imaging? A comparison of two posterior surgeries.
He X; Zhang JN; Liu TJ; Hao DJ
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Jul; 21(1):423. PubMed ID: 32615953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laminoplasty versus laminectomy with posterior spinal fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: influence of cervical alignment on outcomes.
Lau D; Winkler EA; Than KD; Chou D; Mummaneni PV
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Nov; 27(5):508-517. PubMed ID: 28862572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anterior versus posterior surgical approaches to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy: outcomes of the prospective multicenter AOSpine North America CSM study in 264 patients.
Fehlings MG; Barry S; Kopjar B; Yoon ST; Arnold P; Massicotte EM; Vaccaro A; Brodke DS; Shaffrey C; Smith JS; Woodard E; Banco RJ; Chapman J; Janssen M; Bono C; Sasso R; Dekutoski M; Gokaslan ZL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Dec; 38(26):2247-52. PubMed ID: 24108289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a cost analysis.
Goh BC; Striano BM; Lopez WY; Upadhyaya S; Ziino C; Georgakas PJ; Tobert DG; Fogel HA; Cha TD; Schwab JH; Bono CM; Hershman SH
Spine J; 2020 Nov; 20(11):1770-1775. PubMed ID: 32730986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion for treatment of multilevel cervical compressive myelopathy: an updated meta-analysis.
Wang J; Wo J; Wen J; Zhang L; Xu W; Wang X
Postgrad Med J; 2022 Sep; 98(1163):680-688. PubMed ID: 37062984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
