134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27597974)
1. High Dimensional Variable Selection with Error Control.
Kim S; Halabi S
Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():8209453. PubMed ID: 27597974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Model selection based on FDR-thresholding optimizing the area under the ROC-curve.
Graf AC; Bauer P
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2009; 8():Article31. PubMed ID: 19572830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of variable selection methods using stability-based selection.
Lu D; Weljie A; de Leon AR; McConnell Y; Bathe OF; Kopciuk K
BMC Res Notes; 2017 Apr; 10(1):143. PubMed ID: 28376847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combined Performance of Screening and Variable Selection Methods in Ultra-High Dimensional Data in Predicting Time-To-Event Outcomes.
Pi L; Halabi S
Diagn Progn Res; 2018; 2():. PubMed ID: 30393771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Re-sampling strategy to improve the estimation of number of null hypotheses in FDR control under strong correlation structures.
Lu X; Perkins DL
BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 May; 8():157. PubMed ID: 17509157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variable selection in ROC regression.
Wang B
Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():436493. PubMed ID: 24312135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An improved procedure for gene selection from microarray experiments using false discovery rate criterion.
Yang JJ; Yang MC
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Jan; 7():15. PubMed ID: 16405735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data.
Xie Y; Pan W; Khodursky AB
Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4280-8. PubMed ID: 16188930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of false discovery rate methods in identifying genes with differential expression.
Qian HR; Huang S
Genomics; 2005 Oct; 86(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 16054333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Bayesian hierarchical non-linear regression model in receiver operating characteristic analysis of clustered continuous diagnostic data.
Zou KH; O'Malley AJ
Biom J; 2005 Aug; 47(4):417-27. PubMed ID: 16161801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of per sample global scaling and per gene normalization methods for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data.
Li X; Brock GN; Rouchka EC; Cooper NGF; Wu D; O'Toole TE; Gill RS; Eteleeb AM; O'Brien L; Rai SN
PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0176185. PubMed ID: 28459823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multidimensional local false discovery rate for microarray studies.
Ploner A; Calza S; Gusnanto A; Pawitan Y
Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(5):556-65. PubMed ID: 16368770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Regularized binormal ROC method in disease classification using microarray data.
Ma S; Song X; Huang J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 May; 7():253. PubMed ID: 16684357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bayesian regression methodology for estimating a receiver operating characteristic curve with two radiologic applications: prostate biopsy and spiral CT of ureteral stones.
Omalley AJ; Zou KH; Fielding JR; Tempany CM
Acad Radiol; 2001 Aug; 8(8):713-25. PubMed ID: 11508750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marker selection via maximizing the partial area under the ROC curve of linear risk scores.
Wang Z; Chang YC
Biostatistics; 2011 Apr; 12(2):369-85. PubMed ID: 20729218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Work efficiency: a new criterion for comprehensive comparison and evaluation of statistical methods in large-scale identification of differentially expressed genes.
Tan YD
Genomics; 2011 Nov; 98(5):390-9. PubMed ID: 21741470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determination of the differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments using local FDR.
Aubert J; Bar-Hen A; Daudin JJ; Robin S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Sep; 5():125. PubMed ID: 15350197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A mixture model for estimating the local false discovery rate in DNA microarray analysis.
Liao JG; Lin Y; Selvanayagam ZE; Shih WJ
Bioinformatics; 2004 Nov; 20(16):2694-701. PubMed ID: 15145810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Local false discovery rate estimation with competition-based procedures for variable selection.
Sun X; Fu Y
Stat Med; 2024 Jan; 43(1):61-88. PubMed ID: 37927105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
