These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27597974)

  • 1. High Dimensional Variable Selection with Error Control.
    Kim S; Halabi S
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():8209453. PubMed ID: 27597974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Model selection based on FDR-thresholding optimizing the area under the ROC-curve.
    Graf AC; Bauer P
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2009; 8():Article31. PubMed ID: 19572830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of variable selection methods using stability-based selection.
    Lu D; Weljie A; de Leon AR; McConnell Y; Bathe OF; Kopciuk K
    BMC Res Notes; 2017 Apr; 10(1):143. PubMed ID: 28376847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combined Performance of Screening and Variable Selection Methods in Ultra-High Dimensional Data in Predicting Time-To-Event Outcomes.
    Pi L; Halabi S
    Diagn Progn Res; 2018; 2():. PubMed ID: 30393771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Re-sampling strategy to improve the estimation of number of null hypotheses in FDR control under strong correlation structures.
    Lu X; Perkins DL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 May; 8():157. PubMed ID: 17509157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variable selection in ROC regression.
    Wang B
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():436493. PubMed ID: 24312135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An improved procedure for gene selection from microarray experiments using false discovery rate criterion.
    Yang JJ; Yang MC
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Jan; 7():15. PubMed ID: 16405735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data.
    Xie Y; Pan W; Khodursky AB
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4280-8. PubMed ID: 16188930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of false discovery rate methods in identifying genes with differential expression.
    Qian HR; Huang S
    Genomics; 2005 Oct; 86(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 16054333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Bayesian hierarchical non-linear regression model in receiver operating characteristic analysis of clustered continuous diagnostic data.
    Zou KH; O'Malley AJ
    Biom J; 2005 Aug; 47(4):417-27. PubMed ID: 16161801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of per sample global scaling and per gene normalization methods for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data.
    Li X; Brock GN; Rouchka EC; Cooper NGF; Wu D; O'Toole TE; Gill RS; Eteleeb AM; O'Brien L; Rai SN
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0176185. PubMed ID: 28459823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multidimensional local false discovery rate for microarray studies.
    Ploner A; Calza S; Gusnanto A; Pawitan Y
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(5):556-65. PubMed ID: 16368770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Controlling false discovery rate for mediator selection in high-dimensional data.
    Dai R; Li R; Lee S; Liu Y
    Biometrics; 2024 Jul; 80(3):. PubMed ID: 39073774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
    Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian regression methodology for estimating a receiver operating characteristic curve with two radiologic applications: prostate biopsy and spiral CT of ureteral stones.
    Omalley AJ; Zou KH; Fielding JR; Tempany CM
    Acad Radiol; 2001 Aug; 8(8):713-25. PubMed ID: 11508750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marker selection via maximizing the partial area under the ROC curve of linear risk scores.
    Wang Z; Chang YC
    Biostatistics; 2011 Apr; 12(2):369-85. PubMed ID: 20729218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Work efficiency: a new criterion for comprehensive comparison and evaluation of statistical methods in large-scale identification of differentially expressed genes.
    Tan YD
    Genomics; 2011 Nov; 98(5):390-9. PubMed ID: 21741470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determination of the differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments using local FDR.
    Aubert J; Bar-Hen A; Daudin JJ; Robin S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Sep; 5():125. PubMed ID: 15350197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A mixture model for estimating the local false discovery rate in DNA microarray analysis.
    Liao JG; Lin Y; Selvanayagam ZE; Shih WJ
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Nov; 20(16):2694-701. PubMed ID: 15145810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Local false discovery rate estimation with competition-based procedures for variable selection.
    Sun X; Fu Y
    Stat Med; 2024 Jan; 43(1):61-88. PubMed ID: 37927105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.