These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27598040)

  • 1. The effect of distraction on change detection in crowded acoustic scenes.
    Petsas T; Harrison J; Kashino M; Furukawa S; Chait M
    Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():179-189. PubMed ID: 27598040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of sensitivity to transients in the detection of appearing and disappearing objects in complex acoustic scenes.
    Constantino FC; Pinggera L; Chait M
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():183-92. PubMed ID: 23716223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of healthy aging on change detection and sensitivity to predictable structure in crowded acoustic scenes.
    de Kerangal M; Vickers D; Chait M
    Hear Res; 2021 Jan; 399():108074. PubMed ID: 33041093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of capacity limits, memory loss, and sound type in change deafness.
    Gregg MK; Irsik VC; Snyder JS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Nov; 79(8):2564-2575. PubMed ID: 28856615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural dynamics underlying successful auditory short-term memory performance.
    Pomper U; Curetti LZ; Chait M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2023 Oct; 58(8):3859-3878. PubMed ID: 37691137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distraction by deviance: comparing the effects of auditory and visual deviant stimuli on auditory and visual target processing.
    Leiva A; Parmentier FB; Andrés P
    Exp Psychol; 2015; 62(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 25270560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Irrelevant auditory and visual events induce a visual attentional blink.
    Van der Burg E; Nieuwenstein MR; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(2):80-9. PubMed ID: 23047915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of appearing and disappearing objects in complex acoustic scenes.
    Cervantes Constantino F; Pinggera L; Paranamana S; Kashino M; Chait M
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e46167. PubMed ID: 23029426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When loading working memory reduces distraction: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an auditory-visual distraction paradigm.
    SanMiguel I; Corral MJ; Escera C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1131-45. PubMed ID: 18284343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensitivity to temporal structure facilitates perceptual analysis of complex auditory scenes.
    Aman L; Picken S; Andreou LV; Chait M
    Hear Res; 2021 Feb; 400():108111. PubMed ID: 33333425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Time of presentation affects auditory distraction: Changing-state and deviant sounds disrupt similar working memory processes.
    Körner U; Röer JP; Buchner A; Bell R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Mar; 72(3):457-471. PubMed ID: 29360013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detecting and representing predictable structure during auditory scene analysis.
    Sohoglu E; Chait M
    Elife; 2016 Sep; 5():. PubMed ID: 27602577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory salience using natural soundscapes.
    Huang N; Elhilali M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):2163. PubMed ID: 28372080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sadness increases distraction by auditory deviant stimuli.
    Pacheco-Unguetti AP; Parmentier FB
    Emotion; 2014 Feb; 14(1):203-13. PubMed ID: 24098923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of working memory in auditory selective attention.
    Dalton P; Santangelo V; Spence C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Nov; 62(11):2126-32. PubMed ID: 19557667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Habituation of the irrelevant sound effect: evidence for an attentional theory of short-term memory disruption.
    Bell R; Röer JP; Dentale S; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Nov; 38(6):1542-57. PubMed ID: 22612161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Push-pull competition between bottom-up and top-down auditory attention to natural soundscapes.
    Huang N; Elhilali M
    Elife; 2020 Mar; 9():. PubMed ID: 32196457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Increased visual task difficulty enhances attentional capture by both visual and auditory distractor stimuli.
    Sugimoto F; Katayama J
    Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 1664():55-62. PubMed ID: 28377160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Specific foreknowledge reduces auditory distraction by irrelevant speech.
    Röer JP; Bell R; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Jun; 41(3):692-702. PubMed ID: 25621576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.