These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Protecting visual short-term memory during maintenance: Attentional modulation of target and distractor representations. Vissers ME; Gulbinaite R; van den Bos T; Slagter HA Sci Rep; 2017 Jun; 7(1):4061. PubMed ID: 28642613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Stimulus-focused attention speeds up auditory processing. Folyi T; Fehér B; Horváth J Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 May; 84(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 22326595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. N270 sensitivity to conflict strength and working memory: A combined ERP and sLORETA study. Scannella S; Pariente J; De Boissezon X; Castel-Lacanal E; Chauveau N; Causse M; Dehais F; Pastor J Behav Brain Res; 2016 Jan; 297():231-40. PubMed ID: 26477377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Opposing effects of perceptual versus working memory load on emotional distraction. Tavares TP; Logie K; Mitchell DG Exp Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 234(10):2945-56. PubMed ID: 27329606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Distraction by steady-state sounds: Evidence for a graded attentional model of auditory distraction. Bell R; Röer JP; Lang AG; Buchner A J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Apr; 45(4):500-512. PubMed ID: 30816785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Auditory attentional selection is biased by reward cues. Asutay E; Västfjäll D Sci Rep; 2016 Nov; 6():36989. PubMed ID: 27841363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Attentional control and metacognitive monitoring of the effects of different types of task-irrelevant sound on serial recall. Kattner F; Bryce D J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Feb; 48(2):139-158. PubMed ID: 34968110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Working memory controls involuntary attention switching: evidence from an auditory distraction paradigm. Berti S; Schröger E Eur J Neurosci; 2003 Mar; 17(5):1119-22. PubMed ID: 12653989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The time-course of auditory and visual distraction effects in a new crossmodal paradigm. Bendixen A; Grimm S; Deouell LY; Wetzel N; Mädebach A; Schröger E Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2130-9. PubMed ID: 20385149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction. Marsh JE; Campbell TA; Vachon F; Taylor PJ; Hughes RW Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):350-362. PubMed ID: 31290133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Automatic processing of rare versus novel auditory stimuli reveal different mechanisms of auditory change detection. Berti S Neuroreport; 2012 May; 23(7):441-6. PubMed ID: 22440977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Examining task-dependencies of different attentional processes as reflected in the P3a and reorienting negativity components of the human event-related brain potential. Munka L; Berti S Neurosci Lett; 2006 Apr; 396(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 16356637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Identification of environmental sounds with varying spectral resolution. Shafiro V Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):401-20. PubMed ID: 18344871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Distraction and facilitation--two faces of the same coin? Wetzel N; Widmann A; Schröger E J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):664-74. PubMed ID: 22022895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Pupillometry as an Objective Measure of Sustained Attention in Young and Older Listeners. Zhao S; Bury G; Milne A; Chait M Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519887815. PubMed ID: 31775578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]