291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27598468)
1. Exact Power and Sample Size Calculations for the Two One-Sided Tests of Equivalence.
Shieh G
PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0162093. PubMed ID: 27598468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative appraisal of two equivalence tests for multiple standardized effects.
Shieh G
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 Apr; 126():110-7. PubMed ID: 26777779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimal sample sizes for Welch's test under various allocation and cost considerations.
Jan SL; Shieh G
Behav Res Methods; 2011 Dec; 43(4):1014-22. PubMed ID: 21512873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimal sample sizes for the design of reliability studies: power consideration.
Shieh G
Behav Res Methods; 2014 Sep; 46(3):772-85. PubMed ID: 24197712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of alternative approaches for difference, noninferiority, and equivalence testing of normal percentiles.
Shieh G
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):59. PubMed ID: 32169043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sample size planning with the cost constraint for testing superiority and equivalence of two independent groups.
Guo JH; Chen HJ; Luh WM
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):439-61. PubMed ID: 20704777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sample size calculations for the development of biosimilar products.
Kang SH; Kim Y
J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(6):1215-24. PubMed ID: 25032735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An approximate approach to sampling size determination for the equivalence hypothesis.
Hsieh CY; Liu JP
J Biopharm Stat; 2013 May; 23(3):526-38. PubMed ID: 23611193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sample size planning for the noninferiority or equivalence of a linear contrast with cost considerations.
Luh WM; Guo JH
Psychol Methods; 2016 Mar; 21(1):13-34. PubMed ID: 26121080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sample size determination in step-up testing procedures for multiple comparisons with a control.
Kwong KS; Cheung SH; Wen MJ
Stat Med; 2010 Nov; 29(26):2743-56. PubMed ID: 20799258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimal sample sizes for precise interval estimation of Welch's procedure under various allocation and cost considerations.
Shieh G; Jan SL
Behav Res Methods; 2012 Mar; 44(1):202-12. PubMed ID: 21805061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sample size determination for equivalence assessment with multiple endpoints.
Sun A; Dong X; Tsong Y
J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(6):1203-14. PubMed ID: 25032845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Equivalence tests for interchangeability based on two one-sided probabilities.
Dong X; Tsong Y; Shen M
J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(6):1332-48. PubMed ID: 25033074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimal sample size allocation for Welch's test in one-way heteroscedastic ANOVA.
Shieh G; Jan SL
Behav Res Methods; 2015 Jun; 47(2):374-83. PubMed ID: 24903689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing individual equivalence in parallel group and crossover designs: Exact test and sample size procedures.
Shieh G
PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0269128. PubMed ID: 35622872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sample size determinations for Welch's test in one-way heteroscedastic ANOVA.
Jan SL; Shieh G
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Feb; 67(1):72-93. PubMed ID: 23316952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Power and Sample Size Calculations for Contrast Analysis in ANCOVA.
Shieh G
Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 28121163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Precise confidence intervals of regression-based reference limits: Method comparisons and sample size requirements.
Shieh G
Comput Biol Med; 2017 Dec; 91():191-197. PubMed ID: 29100113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The appropriateness of Bland-Altman's approximate confidence intervals for limits of agreement.
Shieh G
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):45. PubMed ID: 29788915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A systematic approach to designing statistically powerful heteroscedastic 2 × 2 factorial studies while minimizing financial costs.
Jan SL; Shieh G
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Aug; 16(1):114. PubMed ID: 27578357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
