These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

932 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27598536)

  • 21. Combining quantitative and qualitative breast density measures to assess breast cancer risk.
    Kerlikowske K; Ma L; Scott CG; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Jensen MR; Sprague BL; Henderson LM; Pankratz VS; Cummings SR; Miglioretti DL; Vachon CM; Shepherd JA
    Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Aug; 19(1):97. PubMed ID: 28830497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Classification of fatty and dense breast parenchyma: comparison of automatic volumetric density measurement and radiologists' classification and their inter-observer variation.
    Østerås BH; Martinsen AC; Brandal SH; Chaudhry KN; Eben E; Haakenaasen U; Falk RS; Skaane P
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Oct; 57(10):1178-85. PubMed ID: 26792823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of assigned BI-RADS breast density category definitions.
    Nicholson BT; LoRusso AP; Smolkin M; Bovbjerg VE; Petroni GR; Harvey JA
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Sep; 13(9):1143-9. PubMed ID: 16935726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Risk stratification of women with false-positive test results in mammography screening based on mammographic morphology and density: A case control study.
    Winkel RR; Euler-Chelpin MV; Lynge E; Diao P; Lillholm M; Kallenberg M; Forman JL; Nielsen MB; Uldall WY; Nielsen M; Vejborg I
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 49():53-60. PubMed ID: 28558329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness thresholds better predicts breast cancer risk.
    Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Evans CF; Dite GS; Stone J; MacInnis RJ; Dowty JG; Bickerstaffe A; Aujard K; Rommens JM; Song YM; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Apicella C; Hopper JL
    Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 46(2):652-661. PubMed ID: 28338721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of subjective and fully automated methods for measuring mammographic density.
    Moshina N; Roman M; Sebuødegård S; Waade GG; Ursin G; Hofvind S
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Feb; 59(2):154-160. PubMed ID: 28565960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
    Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Association of the Interaction Between Mammographic Breast Density, Body Mass Index, and Menopausal Status With Breast Cancer Risk Among Korean Women.
    Tran TXM; Moon SG; Kim S; Park B
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Dec; 4(12):e2139161. PubMed ID: 34940866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Can quantitative evaluation of mammographic breast density, "volumetric measurement", predict the masking risk with dense breast tissue? Investigation by comparison with subjective visual estimation by Japanese radiologists.
    Oiwa M; Endo T; Suda N; Morita T; Sato Y; Kawasaki T; Ichihara S
    Breast Cancer; 2019 May; 26(3):349-358. PubMed ID: 30387023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Racial Differences in Quantitative Measures of Area and Volumetric Breast Density.
    McCarthy AM; Keller BM; Pantalone LM; Hsieh MK; Synnestvedt M; Conant EF; Armstrong K; Kontos D
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2016 Oct; 108(10):. PubMed ID: 27130893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Predicting interval and screen-detected breast cancers from mammographic density defined by different brightness thresholds.
    Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Li S; Trinh NH; Evans CF; Baglietto L; Krishnan K; Dite GS; Stone J; English DR; Song YM; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Hopper JL
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Dec; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 30545395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness threshold better predicts breast cancer risk for full-field digital mammograms.
    Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Evans CF; Yoon-Ho C; Jenkins MA; Sung J; Hopper JL; Song YM
    Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Nov; 17():142. PubMed ID: 26581435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mammographic density and estrogen receptor status of breast cancer.
    Ziv E; Tice J; Smith-Bindman R; Shepherd J; Cummings S; Kerlikowske K
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Dec; 13(12):2090-5. PubMed ID: 15598766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Measuring mammographic density: comparing a fully automated volumetric assessment versus European radiologists' qualitative classification.
    Sartor H; Lång K; Rosso A; Borgquist S; Zackrisson S; Timberg P
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4354-4360. PubMed ID: 27011371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of variability in breast density assessment by BI-RADS category according to the level of experience.
    Eom HJ; Cha JH; Kang JW; Choi WJ; Kim HJ; Go E
    Acta Radiol; 2018 May; 59(5):527-532. PubMed ID: 28766978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Derived mammographic masking measures based on simulated lesions predict the risk of interval cancer after controlling for known risk factors: a case-case analysis.
    Hinton B; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Malkov S; Fan B; Greenwood H; Joe B; Lee V; Strand F; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd J
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1309-1316. PubMed ID: 30697755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Validation of a new fully automated software for 2D digital mammographic breast density evaluation in predicting breast cancer risk.
    Giorgi Rossi P; Djuric O; Hélin V; Astley S; Mantellini P; Nitrosi A; Harkness EF; Gauthier E; Puliti D; Balleyguier C; Baron C; Gilbert FJ; Grivegnée A; Pattacini P; Michiels S; Delaloge S
    Sci Rep; 2021 Oct; 11(1):19884. PubMed ID: 34615978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer].
    Yang KY; Liu XJ; Zhai RY
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Digital volumetric measurement of mammographic density and the risk of overlooking cancer in Japanese women.
    Sawada T; Akashi S; Nakamura S; Kuwayama T; Enokido K; Yoshida M; Hashimoto R; Ide T; Masuda H; Taruno K; Oyama H; Takamaru T; Kanada Y; Ikeda M; Kosugi N; Sato H; Nakayama S; Ata A; Tonouchi Y; Sakai H; Matsunaga Y; Matsutani A
    Breast Cancer; 2017 Sep; 24(5):708-713. PubMed ID: 28238177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 47.