301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27598544)
1. Economic evaluation of long-term impacts of universal newborn hearing screening.
Chiou ST; Lung HL; Chen LS; Yen AM; Fann JC; Chiu SY; Chen HH
Int J Audiol; 2017 Jan; 56(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 27598544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. reducing false positives in newborn hearing screening program: how and why.
Lin HC; Shu MT; Lee KS; Lin HY; Lin G
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Sep; 28(6):788-92. PubMed ID: 17948357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of two-step transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) for universal newborn hearing screening programs.
Benito-Orejas JI; Ramírez B; Morais D; Almaraz A; Fernández-Calvo JL
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Aug; 72(8):1193-201. PubMed ID: 18550180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. When should automatic Auditory Brainstem Response test be used for newborn hearing screening?
Unlu I; Guclu E; Yaman H
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2015 Jun; 42(3):199-202. PubMed ID: 25459495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of hearing screening programs between one step with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and two steps with TEOAE and automated auditory brainstem response.
Lin HC; Shu MT; Lee KS; Ho GM; Fu TY; Bruna S; Lin G
Laryngoscope; 2005 Nov; 115(11):1957-62. PubMed ID: 16319605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using benefit-cost ratio to select Universal Newborn Hearing Screening test criteria.
Porter HL; Neely ST; Gorga MP
Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):447-57. PubMed ID: 19455038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Cost analysis of a universal newborn hearing screening for clinics using the State of Hesse as an example].
Böttcher P; Gramss M; Euler HA; Neumann K
HNO; 2009 Jan; 57(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 19145419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Newborn hearing screening: the great omission.
Mehl AL; Thomson V
Pediatrics; 1998 Jan; 101(1):E4. PubMed ID: 9417168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Projected cost-effectiveness of statewide universal newborn hearing screening.
Keren R; Helfand M; Homer C; McPhillips H; Lieu TA
Pediatrics; 2002 Nov; 110(5):855-64. PubMed ID: 12415021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neonatal hearing screening - does failure in TEOAE screening matter when the AABR test is passed?
Gellrich D; Gröger M; Echternach M; Eder K; Huber P
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Mar; 281(3):1273-1283. PubMed ID: 37831131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Results of a 1-year government-funded newborn hearing screening program in Taiwan.
Hsu HC; Lee FP; Huang HM
Laryngoscope; 2013 May; 123(5):1275-8. PubMed ID: 23378368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An effective compromise between cost and referral rate: A sequential hearing screening protocol using TEOAEs and AABRs for healthy newborns.
Shang Y; Hao W; Gao Z; Xu C; Ru Y; Ni D
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Dec; 91():141-145. PubMed ID: 27863628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening strategies for neonatal hearing loss: which test is best?
Dort JC; Tobolski C; Brown D
J Otolaryngol; 2000 Aug; 29(4):206-10. PubMed ID: 11003070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost and cost-effectiveness of universal screening for hearing loss in newborns.
Kezirian EJ; White KR; Yueh B; Sullivan SD
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2001 Apr; 124(4):359-67. PubMed ID: 11283492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of technology choice on service provision for universal newborn hearing screening within a busy district hospital.
Iley KL; Addis RJ
J Perinatol; 2000 Dec; 20(8 Pt 2):S122-7. PubMed ID: 11190692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness analysis on implementing newborn hearing screening programmes in a low- to middle-income country.
Pitathawatchai P; Chaichulee S; Wannaro W; Pongprawat P
Int J Audiol; 2023 Jan; 62(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 35075981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of currently available devices designed for newborn hearing screening using automated auditory brainstem and/or otoacoustic emission measurements.
Meier S; Narabayashi O; Probst R; Schmuziger N
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Jul; 68(7):927-34. PubMed ID: 15183584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Benefits and costs of universal hearing screening programme.
Cao-Nguyen MH; Kos MI; Guyot JP
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Oct; 71(10):1591-5. PubMed ID: 17719096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Challenges of Implementing Universal Newborn Hearing Screening at a Tertiary Care Centre from India.
Gupta S; Sah S; Som T; Saksena M; Yadav CP; Sankar MJ; Thakar A; Agarwal R; Deorari AK; Paul VK
Indian J Pediatr; 2015 Aug; 82(8):688-93. PubMed ID: 25652547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of costs and referral rates of 3 universal newborn hearing screening protocols.
Vohr BR; Oh W; Stewart EJ; Bentkover JD; Gabbard S; Lemons J; Papile LA; Pye R
J Pediatr; 2001 Aug; 139(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 11487750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
