These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27598562)

  • 1. Context influences interpretation of eyewitness confidence statements.
    Cash DK; Lane SM
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Apr; 41(2):180-190. PubMed ID: 27598562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving the interpretation of verbal eyewitness confidence statements by distinguishing perceptions of certainty from those of accuracy.
    Grabman JH; Cash DK; Slane CR; Dodson CS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2022 Sep; 28(3):589-605. PubMed ID: 34081495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Misinterpreting eyewitness expressions of confidence: The featural justification effect.
    Dodson CS; Dobolyi DG
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):266-80. PubMed ID: 25602181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mock-juror evaluations of traditional and ratings-based eyewitness identification evidence.
    Sauer JD; Palmer MA; Brewer N
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Aug; 41(4):375-384. PubMed ID: 28191988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The dud effect: adding highly dissimilar fillers increases confidence in lineup identifications.
    Charman SD; Wells GL; Joy SW
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Dec; 35(6):479-500. PubMed ID: 21222024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing Verbal Eyewitness Confidence Statements Using Natural Language Processing.
    Greenspan RL; Lyman A; Heaton P
    Psychol Sci; 2024 Mar; 35(3):277-287. PubMed ID: 38376954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How sure are you that this is the man you saw? Child witnesses can use confidence judgments to identify a target.
    Bruer KC; Fitzgerald RJ; Price HL; Sauer JD
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Dec; 41(6):541-555. PubMed ID: 28816467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Administrator blindness affects the recording of eyewitness lineup outcomes.
    Rodriguez DN; Berry MA
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Feb; 44(1):71-87. PubMed ID: 31535891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Eyewitnesses' free-report verbal confidence statements are diagnostic of accuracy.
    Smalarz L; Yang Y; Wells GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Apr; 45(2):138-151. PubMed ID: 34110875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can Lineup Administrators Blind to the Suspect's Identity Influence Witnesses' Decisions?
    McCallum NA; Brewer N
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(1):93-105. PubMed ID: 31984009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pre-identification confidence is related to eyewitness lineup identification accuracy across heterogeneous encoding conditions.
    Molinaro PF; Charman SD; Wylie K
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Dec; 45(6):524-541. PubMed ID: 34661424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing nonchoosers' eyewitness identification accuracy from photographic showups by using confidence and response times.
    Sauerland M; Sagana A; Sporer SL
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Oct; 36(5):394-403. PubMed ID: 23030820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Postidentification feedback affects subsequent eyewitness identification performance.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Dec; 16(4):387-98. PubMed ID: 21198255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sequential lineup laps and eyewitness accuracy.
    Steblay NK; Dietrich HL; Ryan SL; Raczynski JL; James KA
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Aug; 35(4):262-74. PubMed ID: 20632113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does filler database size influence identification accuracy?
    Bergold AN; Heaton P
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Jun; 42(3):227-243. PubMed ID: 29809026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do masked-face lineups facilitate eyewitness identification of a masked individual?
    Manley KD; Chan JCK; Wells GL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Sep; 25(3):396-409. PubMed ID: 30556719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lineup administrators' expectations: their impact on eyewitness confidence.
    Garrioch L; Brimacombe CA
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Jun; 25(3):299-315. PubMed ID: 11480805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lineup administrator influences on eyewitness identification decisions.
    Clark SE; Marshall TE; Rosenthal R
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 19309217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Eyewitness confidence and mock juror decisions of guilt: A meta-analytic review.
    Slane CR; Dodson CS
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Feb; 46(1):45-66. PubMed ID: 35073115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The information gained from witnesses' responses to an initial "blank" lineup.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Oct; 36(5):439-47. PubMed ID: 22468758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.