344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27598696)
1. Microbial source tracking in impaired watersheds using PhyloChip and machine-learning classification.
Dubinsky EA; Butkus SR; Andersen GL
Water Res; 2016 Nov; 105():56-64. PubMed ID: 27598696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microbial source tracking (MST) in Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area: Seasonal and precipitation trends in MST marker concentrations, and associations with E. coli levels, pathogenic marker presence, and land use.
McKee BA; Molina M; Cyterski M; Couch A
Water Res; 2020 Mar; 171():115435. PubMed ID: 31927096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Microbial and Chemical Source Tracking Markers To Identify Fecal Contamination Sources in the Humber River (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) and Associated Storm Water Outfalls.
Staley ZR; Grabuski J; Sverko E; Edge TA
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2016 Nov; 82(21):6357-6366. PubMed ID: 27542934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterization of sources and loadings of fecal pollutants using microbial source tracking assays in urban and rural areas of the Grand River Watershed, Southwestern Ontario.
Lee DY; Lee H; Trevors JT; Weir SC; Thomas JL; Habash M
Water Res; 2014 Apr; 53():123-31. PubMed ID: 24509346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Enterococcal Concentrations in a Coastal Ecosystem Are a Function of Fecal Source Input, Environmental Conditions, and Environmental Sources.
Rothenheber D; Jones S
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 84(17):. PubMed ID: 30006393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anthropogenic activity remains the main contributor to fecal pollution in managed tropical watersheds as unraveled by PhyloChip microarray-based microbial source tracking.
Zhao S; Rogers MJ; Liu Y; Andersen GL; He J
J Hazard Mater; 2024 Jan; 461():132474. PubMed ID: 37717440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors affecting the presence of human-associated and fecal indicator real-time quantitative PCR genetic markers in urban-impacted recreational beaches.
Molina M; Hunter S; Cyterski M; Peed LA; Kelty CA; Sivaganesan M; Mooney T; Prieto L; Shanks OC
Water Res; 2014 Nov; 64():196-208. PubMed ID: 25061692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microbial Source Tracking Using Quantitative and Digital PCR To Identify Sources of Fecal Contamination in Stormwater, River Water, and Beach Water in a Great Lakes Area of Concern.
Staley ZR; Boyd RJ; Shum P; Edge TA
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Oct; 84(20):. PubMed ID: 30097445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Semi-quantitative evaluation of fecal contamination potential by human and ruminant sources using multiple lines of evidence.
Stoeckel DM; Stelzer EA; Stogner RW; Mau DP
Water Res; 2011 May; 45(10):3225-44. PubMed ID: 21513966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Into the deep: Evaluation of SourceTracker for assessment of faecal contamination of coastal waters.
Henry R; Schang C; Coutts S; Kolotelo P; Prosser T; Crosbie N; Grant T; Cottam D; O'Brien P; Deletic A; McCarthy D
Water Res; 2016 Apr; 93():242-253. PubMed ID: 26921850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Antimicrobial resistance of fecal bacteria in waters of the Seine river watershed (France).
Servais P; Passerat J
Sci Total Environ; 2009 Dec; 408(2):365-72. PubMed ID: 19853889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiple lines of evidence to identify sewage as the cause of water quality impairment in an urbanized tropical watershed.
Kirs M; Kisand V; Wong M; Caffaro-Filho RA; Moravcik P; Harwood VJ; Yoneyama B; Fujioka RS
Water Res; 2017 Jun; 116():23-33. PubMed ID: 28292677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Elucidating Waterborne Pathogen Presence and Aiding Source Apportionment in an Impaired Stream.
Weidhaas J; Anderson A; Jamal R
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Mar; 84(6):. PubMed ID: 29305503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microbial source tracking in a coastal California watershed reveals canines as controllable sources of fecal contamination.
Ervin JS; Van De Werfhorst LC; Murray JL; Holden PA
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Aug; 48(16):9043-52. PubMed ID: 25055204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing multiple fecal sources to surf zone waters of two recreational beaches by bacterial community analysis.
Li D; Van De Werfhorst LC; Steets B; Ervin J; Murray JLS; Smith J; Holden PA
Water Res; 2022 Aug; 221():118781. PubMed ID: 35759849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fecal indicator bacteria, fecal source tracking markers, and pathogens detected in two Hudson River tributaries.
Brooks YM; Spirito CM; Bae JS; Hong A; Mosier EM; Sausele DJ; Fernandez-Baca CP; Epstein JL; Shapley DJ; Goodman LB; Anderson RR; Glaser AL; Richardson RE
Water Res; 2020 Mar; 171():115342. PubMed ID: 31841955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of molecular community analysis methods for discerning fecal sources and human waste.
Cao Y; Van De Werfhorst LC; Dubinsky EA; Badgley BD; Sadowsky MJ; Andersen GL; Griffith JF; Holden PA
Water Res; 2013 Nov; 47(18):6862-72. PubMed ID: 23880215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determination of wild animal sources of fecal indicator bacteria by microbial source tracking (MST) influences regulatory decisions.
Nguyen KH; Senay C; Young S; Nayak B; Lobos A; Conrad J; Harwood VJ
Water Res; 2018 Nov; 144():424-434. PubMed ID: 30059905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of phylogenetic microarray analysis to discriminate sources of fecal pollution.
Dubinsky EA; Esmaili L; Hulls JR; Cao Y; Griffith JF; Andersen GL
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Apr; 46(8):4340-7. PubMed ID: 22360280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantifying the Relative Contributions of Environmental Sources to the Microbial Community in an Urban Stream under Dry and Wet Weather Conditions.
Baral D; Speicher A; Dvorak B; Admiraal D; Li X
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Aug; 84(15):. PubMed ID: 29858206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
