These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27598731)

  • 21. Intraocular lens power calculation after laser refractive surgery: corrective algorithm for corneal power estimation.
    Jin H; Holzer MP; Rabsilber T; Borkenstein AF; Limberger IJ; Guo H; Auffarth GU
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jan; 36(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 20117710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Corneal power evaluation after myopic corneal refractive surgery using artificial neural networks.
    Koprowski R; Lanza M; Irregolare C
    Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Nov; 15(1):121. PubMed ID: 27846894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Long-term corneal wavefront aberration variations after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia and myopic astigmatism.
    Serrao S; Lombardo G; Ducoli P; Lombardo M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1655-66. PubMed ID: 21782383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Causes of spherical aberration induced by laser refractive surgery.
    Yoon G; Macrae S; Williams DR; Cox IG
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):127-35. PubMed ID: 15721705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Improved contrast sensitivity and visual acuity after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: in-depth statistical analysis.
    Tuan KM; Liang J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Feb; 32(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 16564995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Refractive error may influence mesopic pupil size.
    Cakmak HB; Cagil N; Simavli H; Duzen B; Simsek S
    Curr Eye Res; 2010 Feb; 35(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 20136423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Optical performance of the cornea six years following photorefractive keratectomy for myopia.
    Serrao S; Lombardo G; Ducoli P; Lombardo M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Feb; 52(2):846-57. PubMed ID: 21051709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dynamic vaulting changes in V4c versus V4 posterior chamber phakic lenses under differing lighting conditions.
    Lee H; Kang SY; Seo KY; Chung B; Choi JY; Kim KS; Kim TI
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 158(6):1199-1204.e1. PubMed ID: 25149911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Past and present of corneal refractive surgery: a retrospective study of long-term results after photorefractive keratectomy and a prospective study of refractive lenticule extraction.
    Vestergaard AH
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Mar; 92 Thesis 2():1-21. PubMed ID: 24636364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A direct method to measure the power of the central cornea after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Sónego-Krone S; López-Moreno G; Beaujon-Balbi OV; Arce CG; Schor P; Campos M
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2004 Feb; 122(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 14769590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Four corneal presbyopia corrections: simulations of optical consequences on retinal image quality.
    Koller T; Seiler T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Dec; 32(12):2118-23. PubMed ID: 17137994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of keratometric changes after myopic ablation: ray tracing versus simulated keratometry.
    Mello GR; Roberts CJ; Smadja D; Serpe CC; Krueger RR; Santhiago MR
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Sep; 29(9):604-10. PubMed ID: 23898948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of pupil size on visual acuity in a laboratory model of pseudophakic monovision.
    Kawamorita T; Uozato H; Handa T; Ito M; Shimizu K
    J Refract Surg; 2010 May; 26(5):378-80. PubMed ID: 20166628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Theoretical analysis for spherical aberration induction with low-order correction in refractive surgery.
    Dai GM
    Appl Opt; 2012 Jun; 51(18):3966-76. PubMed ID: 22722270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Measurement of the spatial shift of the pupil center.
    Camellin M; Gambino F; Casaro S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Sep; 31(9):1719-21. PubMed ID: 16246774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Visual performance after LASIK for a Q-optimized and a standard ablation algorithm.
    Villa C; Jiménez JR; Anera RG; Gutiérrez R; Hita E
    Appl Opt; 2009 Oct; 48(30):5741-7. PubMed ID: 19844310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of optical quality metrics to predict subjective quality of vision after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Bühren J; Pesudovs K; Martin T; Strenger A; Yoon G; Kohnen T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 May; 35(5):846-55. PubMed ID: 19393883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A paraxial schematic eye model for the growing C57BL/6 mouse.
    Schmucker C; Schaeffel F
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(16):1857-67. PubMed ID: 15145680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Corneal ray tracing versus simulated keratometry for estimating corneal power changes after excimer laser surgery.
    Savini G; Calossi A; Camellin M; Carones F; Fantozzi M; Hoffer KJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1109-15. PubMed ID: 24874768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Optical zone diameters for photorefractive corneal surgery.
    Roberts CW; Koester CJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Jun; 34(7):2275-81. PubMed ID: 8505209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.