358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27598774)
1. Risk Factors for Failure of Male Slings and Artificial Urinary Sphincters: Results from a Large Middle European Cohort Study.
Hüsch T; Kretschmer A; Thomsen F; Kronlachner D; Kurosch M; Obaje A; Anding R; Pottek T; Rose A; Olianas R; Friedl A; Hübner W; Homberg R; Pfitzenmaier J; Grein U; Queissert F; Naumann CM; Schweiger J; Wotzka C; Nyarangi-Dix J; Hofmann T; Ulm K; Bauer RM; Haferkamp A;
Urol Int; 2017; 99(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 27598774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of complication rates related to male urethral slings and artificial urinary sphincters for urinary incontinence: national multi-institutional analysis of ACS-NSQIP database.
Alwaal A; Harris CR; Awad MA; Allen IE; Breyer BN
Int Urol Nephrol; 2016 Oct; 48(10):1571-6. PubMed ID: 27417131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Male synthetic sling versus artificial urinary sphincter trial for men with urodynamic stress incontinence after prostate surgery (MASTER): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Constable L; Cotterill N; Cooper D; Glazener C; Drake MJ; Forrest M; Harding C; Kilonzo M; MacLennan G; McCormack K; McDonald A; Mundy A; Norrie J; Pickard R; Ramsay C; Smith R; Wileman S; Abrams P;
Trials; 2018 Feb; 19(1):131. PubMed ID: 29467024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of adjustable male slings and artificial urinary sphincter in the treatment of male urinary incontinence: a retrospective analysis of patient selection and postoperative continence status.
Grabbert M; Hüsch T; Kretschmer A; Kirschner-Hermanns R; Anding R; Rose A; Friedl A; Obaje A; Heidenreich A; Brehmer B; Naumann CM; Queissert F; Loertzer H; Pfitzenmaier J; Nyarangi-Dix J; Kurosch M; Olianas R; Homberg R; Abdunnur R; Schweiger J; Hofmann T; Wotzka C; Pottek T; Huebner W; Haferkamp A; Bauer RM
World J Urol; 2019 Jul; 37(7):1415-1420. PubMed ID: 30341450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Commentary on: Comparison of complication rates related to male urethral slings and artificial urinary sphincters for urinary incontinence: national multi-institutional analysis of ACS-NSQIP database.
Horstmann M
Int Urol Nephrol; 2016 Oct; 48(10):1577. PubMed ID: 27394137
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Survival of the artificial urinary sphincter in a changing patient profile.
Te Dorsthorst MJ; van der Doelen MJ; Farag F; Martens FMJ; Heesakkers JPFA
World J Urol; 2019 May; 37(5):899-906. PubMed ID: 30155727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Functional outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter implantation with distal bulbar double cuff in men with and without a history of external beam radiotherapy: an analysis of a prospective database.
Maurer V; Marks P; Dahlem R; Rosenbaum CM; Meyer CP; Riechardt S; Fisch M; Ludwig T
BJU Int; 2019 Dec; 124(6):1040-1046. PubMed ID: 31351030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Male Sling and Artificial Urethral Sphincter for Male Stress Urinary Incontinence Among Certifying American Urologists.
Liu JS; Hofer MD; Milose J; Oberlin DT; Flury SC; Morey AF; Gonzalez CM
Urology; 2016 Jan; 87():95-9. PubMed ID: 26344152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term functional outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in men with stress urinary incontinence.
Léon P; Chartier-Kastler E; Rouprêt M; Ambrogi V; Mozer P; Phé V
BJU Int; 2015 Jun; 115(6):951-7. PubMed ID: 24958004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Potential risk factors and outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter placement after radical cystectomy and orthotopic neobladder urinary diversion.
Vainrib M; Simma-Chiang V; Boyd SD; Ginsberg DA
Neurourol Urodyn; 2013 Sep; 32(7):1010-3. PubMed ID: 23595916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Artificial Urinary Sphincter is Superior to a Secondary Transobturator Male Sling in Cases of a Primary Sling Failure.
Ajay D; Zhang H; Gupta S; Selph JP; Belsante MJ; Lentz AC; Webster GD; Peterson AC
J Urol; 2015 Oct; 194(4):1038-42. PubMed ID: 25963183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The TiLOOP® Male Sling: Did We Forejudge.
Hüsch T; Kretschmer A; Thomsen F; Kronlachner D; Kurosch M; Obaje A; Anding R; Kirschner-Hermanns R; Pottek T; Rose A; Olianas R; Friedl A; Hübner W; Homberg R; Pfitzenmaier J; Grein U; Queissert F; Naumann CM; Schweiger J; Wotzka C; Nyarangi-Dix J; Brehmer B; Ulm K; Bauer RM; Haferkamp A;
Urol Int; 2018; 100(2):216-221. PubMed ID: 29069660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Erosion rates of 3.5-cm artificial urinary sphincter cuffs are similar to larger cuffs.
McKibben MJ; Shakir N; Fuchs JS; Scott JM; Morey AF
BJU Int; 2019 Feb; 123(2):335-341. PubMed ID: 30007096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Artificial Urinary Sphincter Outperforms Sling for Moderate Male Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Khouri RK; Ortiz NM; Baumgarten AS; Ward EE; VanDyke ME; Hudak SJ; Morey AF
Urology; 2020 Jul; 141():168-172. PubMed ID: 32289365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adjustable Transobturator Male System after Failed Surgical Devices for Male Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Feasibility Study.
Angulo JC; Esquinas C; Arance I; Rodríguez A; Pereira J; Rabassa M; Teyrouz A; Teba F; Celada G; Marcelino JP; Martins FE; Manso M; Cruz F
Urol Int; 2018; 101(1):106-113. PubMed ID: 29953998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of previous urethroplasty on the outcome after artificial urinary sphincter implantation: a prospective evaluation.
Sayedahmed K; Olianas R; Kaftan B; Omar M; El Shazly M; Burger M; Mayr R; Rosenhammer B
World J Urol; 2020 Jan; 38(1):183-191. PubMed ID: 30980093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy and safety of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS): Results of a large multi-institutional cohort of patients with mid-term follow-up.
Tutolo M; Cornu JN; Bauer RM; Ahyai S; Bozzini G; Heesakkers J; Drake MJ; Tikkinen KAO; Launonen E; Larré S; Thiruchelvam N; Lee R; Li P; Favro M; Zaffuto E; Bachmann A; Martinez-Salamanca JI; Pichon T; De Nunzio C; Ammirati E; Haab F; Van Der Aa F
Neurourol Urodyn; 2019 Feb; 38(2):710-718. PubMed ID: 30575997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prolonged Duration of Incontinence for Men Before Initial Anti-incontinence Surgery: An Opportunity for Improvement.
Fuchs JS; Shakir N; McKibben MJ; Scott JM; Morey AF
Urology; 2018 Sep; 119():149-154. PubMed ID: 29859893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Waves of Change: National Trends in Surgical Management of Male Stress Incontinence.
MacDonald S; Colaco M; Terlecki R
Urology; 2017 Oct; 108():175-179. PubMed ID: 28709851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Impact of Urethral Risk Factors on Transcorporeal Artificial Urinary Sphincter Erosion Rates and Device Survival.
Mock S; Dmochowski RR; Brown ET; Reynolds WS; Kaufman MR; Milam DF
J Urol; 2015 Dec; 194(6):1692-6. PubMed ID: 26141851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
