These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27599176)
1. Differences in Corneal Biomechanics in Nonpenetrating Deep Sclerectomy and Deep Sclerectomy Reconverted into Trabeculectomy. Casado A; Cabarga C; Pérez-Sarriegui A; Fuentemilla E J Glaucoma; 2017 Jan; 26(1):15-19. PubMed ID: 27599176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modifications in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure after deep sclerectomy. Iordanidou V; Hamard P; Gendron G; Labbé A; Raphael M; Baudouin C J Glaucoma; 2010; 19(4):252-6. PubMed ID: 19661821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes. Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma. Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors influencing intermethod agreement between goldmann applanation, pascal dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometry. Sullivan-Mee M; Lewis SE; Pensyl D; Gerhardt G; Halverson KD; Qualls C J Glaucoma; 2013 Aug; 22(6):487-95. PubMed ID: 22407388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can Corneal Biomechanical Properties Explain Difference in Tonometric Measurement in Normal Eyes? Dey A; David RL; Asokan R; George R Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Feb; 95(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 29370019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. Kotecha A; Elsheikh A; Roberts CR; Zhu H; Garway-Heath DF Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5337-47. PubMed ID: 17122122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy with reticulated hyaluronic acid implant versus punch trabeculectomy: a prospective clinical trial. Russo V; Scott IU; Stella A; Balducci F; Cosma A; Barone A; Delle Noci N Eur J Ophthalmol; 2008; 18(5):751-7. PubMed ID: 18850554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanics in Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy and after posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Clemmensen K; Hjortdal J Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Jun; 92(4):350-4. PubMed ID: 23607620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma. Sullivan-Mee M; Halverson KD; Qualls C J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):694-9. PubMed ID: 18091457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Corneal biomechanics measured with the ocular response analyser in patients with unilateral open-angle glaucoma. Hirneiss C; Neubauer AS; Yu A; Kampik A; Kernt M Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Mar; 89(2):e189-92. PubMed ID: 21288308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties and optic nerve head changes after deep sclerectomy. Díez-Álvarez L; Muñoz-Negrete FJ; Casas-Llera P; Oblanca N; de Juan V; Rebolleda G Eur J Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 27(5):535-541. PubMed ID: 28430332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraocular pressure and biomechanical corneal properties measure by ocular response analyser in patients with primary congenital glaucoma. Perucho-González L; Martínez de la Casa JM; Morales-Fernández L; Bañeros-Rojas P; Saenz-Francés F; García-Feijoó J Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 94(5):e293-7. PubMed ID: 26647905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Biomechanically Corrected Intraocular Pressure Obtained by Corvis ST and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension. Ye Y; Yang Y; Fan Y; Lan M; Yu K; Yu M J Glaucoma; 2019 Oct; 28(10):922-928. PubMed ID: 31453898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic Efficacy of Normalization of Corneal Deformation Variables by the Intraocular Pressure in Glaucomatous Eyes. Tejwani S; Devi S; Dinakaran S; Shetty R; Meshram P; Francis M; Sinha Roy A Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Mar; 57(3):1082-6. PubMed ID: 26968738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The relationship between diurnal variations in intraocular pressure measurements and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis. Kotecha A; Crabb DP; Spratt A; Garway-Heath DF Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Sep; 50(9):4229-36. PubMed ID: 19407025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The relationship between measurement method and corneal structure on apparent intraocular pressure in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Nessim M; Mollan SP; Wolffsohn JS; Laiquzzaman M; Sivakumar S; Hartley S; Shah S Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Apr; 36(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 23253796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers. Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude comparisons in different types of glaucoma using dynamic contour tonometry. Punjabi OS; Ho HK; Kniestedt C; Bostrom AG; Stamper RL; Lin SC Curr Eye Res; 2006 Oct; 31(10):851-62. PubMed ID: 17050277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]