These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. The impact of visceral obesity on surgical outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer. Watanabe J; Tatsumi K; Ota M; Suwa Y; Suzuki S; Watanabe A; Ishibe A; Watanabe K; Akiyama H; Ichikawa Y; Morita S; Endo I Int J Colorectal Dis; 2014 Mar; 29(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 24297037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Impact of Body Composition on Surgical Outcome in Rectal Cancer Patients, a Retrospective Cohort Study. Heus C; Bakker N; Verduin WM; Doodeman HJ; Houdijk APJ World J Surg; 2019 May; 43(5):1370-1376. PubMed ID: 30719554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Initial experience of Chinese surgical robot "Micro Hand S″-assisted versus open and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Short-term outcomes in a single center. Wang Y; Li Z; Yi B; Zhu S Asian J Surg; 2022 Jan; 45(1):299-306. PubMed ID: 34147330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Short-term outcomes after robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Hellan M; Anderson C; Ellenhorn JD; Paz B; Pigazzi A Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Nov; 14(11):3168-73. PubMed ID: 17763911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Improving conventional recovery with enhanced recovery in minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer. Khreiss W; Huebner M; Cima RR; Dozois ER; Chua HK; Pemberton JH; Harmsen WS; Larson DW Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 May; 57(5):557-63. PubMed ID: 24819094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic vs open surgery for stages II and III rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study. Zhou ZX; Zhao LY; Lin T; Liu H; Deng HJ; Zhu HL; Yan J; Li GX World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(18):5505-12. PubMed ID: 25987773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) for Sphincter-Saving Surgery: Is There Any Difference in the Transanal TME Rectal Approach? : A Single-Center Series of 120 Consecutive Patients. Colombo PE; Bertrand MM; Alline M; Boulay E; Mourregot A; Carrère S; Quénet F; Jarlier M; Rouanet P Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 May; 23(5):1594-600. PubMed ID: 26714950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Comparison between the perioperative results of single-access and conventional laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer. Sirikurnpiboon S Asian J Endosc Surg; 2016 Feb; 9(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 26565739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between standard laparoscopic and robot-assisted approach in patients with rectosigmoid endometriosis. Raimondo D; Alboni C; Orsini B; Aru AC; Farulla A; Maletta M; Arena A; Del Forno S; Sampogna V; Mastronardi M; Petrillo M; Seracchioli R Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Sep; 100(9):1740-1746. PubMed ID: 33999408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure. Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Perioperative outcomes of robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopy surgery for advanced-stage endometriosis. Nezhat FR; Sirota I JSLS; 2014; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 25489208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Evaluation of robot-assisted laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair in children. Gao Y; Han X; Tan Z J Robot Surg; 2024 Jan; 18(1):32. PubMed ID: 38231355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. What have we gained by performing robotic rectal resection? Evaluation of 64 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma. Erguner I; Aytac E; Boler DE; Atalar B; Baca B; Karahasanoglu T; Hamzaoglu I; Uras C Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2013 Jun; 23(3):316-9. PubMed ID: 23752000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Oncologic outcomes and perioperative clinicopathologic results after robot-assisted tumor-specific mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Baik SH; Kim NK; Lim DR; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Aug; 20(8):2625-32. PubMed ID: 23417433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Advantages of a robotic approach compared with laparoscopy gastrectomy for patients with high visceral fat area. Hikage M; Fujiya K; Waki Y; Kamiya S; Tanizawa Y; Bando E; Notsu A; Terashima M Surg Endosc; 2022 Aug; 36(8):6181-6193. PubMed ID: 35294634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Memon S; Heriot AG; Murphy DG; Bressel M; Lynch AC Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jul; 19(7):2095-101. PubMed ID: 22350601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Robotic Rectal Cancer Resection: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis. Hellan M; Ouellette J; Lagares-Garcia JA; Rauh SM; Kennedy HL; Nicholson JD; Nesbitt D; Johnson CS; Pigazzi A Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Jul; 22(7):2151-8. PubMed ID: 25487966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Robotic vs laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of a case-control study. Kwak JM; Kim SH; Kim J; Son DN; Baek SJ; Cho JS Dis Colon Rectum; 2011 Feb; 54(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 21228661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]