These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27600554)

  • 21. SAMPL7: Host-guest binding prediction by molecular dynamics and quantum mechanics.
    Eken Y; Almeida NMS; Wang C; Wilson AK
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jan; 35(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 33150463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations.
    Rizzi A; Jensen T; Slochower DR; Aldeghi M; Gapsys V; Ntekoumes D; Bosisio S; Papadourakis M; Henriksen NM; de Groot BL; Cournia Z; Dickson A; Michel J; Gilson MK; Shirts MR; Mobley DL; Chodera JD
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):601-633. PubMed ID: 31984465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. SAMPL7 Host-Guest Challenge Overview: assessing the reliability of polarizable and non-polarizable methods for binding free energy calculations.
    Amezcua M; El Khoury L; Mobley DL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jan; 35(1):1-35. PubMed ID: 33392951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Force matching as a stepping stone to QM/MM CB[8] host/guest binding free energies: a SAMPL6 cautionary tale.
    Hudson PS; Han K; Woodcock HL; Brooks BR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):983-999. PubMed ID: 30276502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Absolute binding free energies for the SAMPL6 cucurbit[8]uril host-guest challenge via the AMOEBA polarizable force field.
    Laury ML; Wang Z; Gordon AS; Ponder JW
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1087-1095. PubMed ID: 30324303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Lessons learned from comparing molecular dynamics engines on the SAMPL5 dataset.
    Shirts MR; Klein C; Swails JM; Yin J; Gilson MK; Mobley DL; Case DA; Zhong ED
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):147-161. PubMed ID: 27787702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Binding of carboxylate and trimethylammonium salts to octa-acid and TEMOA deep-cavity cavitands.
    Sullivan MR; Sokkalingam P; Nguyen T; Donahue JP; Gibb BC
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):21-28. PubMed ID: 27432339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prediction of CB[8] host-guest binding free energies in SAMPL6 using the double-decoupling method.
    Han K; Hudson PS; Jones MR; Nishikawa N; Tofoleanu F; Brooks BR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1059-1073. PubMed ID: 30084077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Tuning Potential Functions to Host-Guest Binding Data.
    Setiadi J; Boothroyd S; Slochower DR; Dotson DL; Thompson MW; Wagner JR; Wang LP; Gilson MK
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2024 Jan; 20(1):239-252. PubMed ID: 38147689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A QM/MM study of the binding of RAPTA ligands to cathepsin B.
    Ciancetta A; Genheden S; Ryde U
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2011 Aug; 25(8):729-42. PubMed ID: 21701919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Thermodynamic integration to predict host-guest binding affinities.
    Lawrenz M; Wereszczynski J; Ortiz-Sánchez JM; Nichols SE; McCammon JA
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 May; 26(5):569-76. PubMed ID: 22350568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accurate predictions of nonpolar solvation free energies require explicit consideration of binding-site hydration.
    Genheden S; Mikulskis P; Hu L; Kongsted J; Söderhjelm P; Ryde U
    J Am Chem Soc; 2011 Aug; 133(33):13081-92. PubMed ID: 21728337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Develop and test a solvent accessible surface area-based model in conformational entropy calculations.
    Wang J; Hou T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 May; 52(5):1199-212. PubMed ID: 22497310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy comparison of several common implicit solvent models and their implementations in the context of protein-ligand binding.
    Katkova EV; Onufriev AV; Aguilar B; Sulimov VB
    J Mol Graph Model; 2017 Mar; 72():70-80. PubMed ID: 28064081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of MM/GBSA calculations based on explicit and implicit solvent simulations.
    Godschalk F; Genheden S; Söderhjelm P; Ryde U
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2013 May; 15(20):7731-9. PubMed ID: 23595060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Host-Guest Relative Binding Affinities at Density-Functional Theory Level from Semiempirical Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
    Wang M; Mei Y; Ryde U
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Apr; 15(4):2659-2671. PubMed ID: 30811192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Density functional theory based study of molecular interactions, recognition, engineering, and quantum transport in π molecular systems.
    Cho Y; Cho WJ; Youn IS; Lee G; Singh NJ; Kim KS
    Acc Chem Res; 2014 Nov; 47(11):3321-30. PubMed ID: 25338296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinities and binding poses from spherical-coordinates-biased simulations.
    Sun Z; He Q; Li X; Zhu Z
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):589-600. PubMed ID: 31974852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Partition coefficients for the SAMPL5 challenge using transfer free energies.
    Jones MR; Brooks BR; Wilson AK
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Nov; 30(11):1129-1138. PubMed ID: 27646287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Supramolecular binding thermodynamics by dispersion-corrected density functional theory.
    Grimme S
    Chemistry; 2012 Aug; 18(32):9955-64. PubMed ID: 22782805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.