1945 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27600634)
1. Current state of computer navigation and robotics in unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
van der List JP; Chawla H; Joskowicz L; Pearle AD
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Nov; 24(11):3482-3495. PubMed ID: 27600634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic-Assisted Knee Arthroplasty: An Overview.
van der List JP; Chawla H; Pearle AD
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2016; 45(4):202-11. PubMed ID: 27327911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Current Role of Computer Navigation in Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Jones CW; Jerabek SA
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jul; 33(7):1989-1993. PubMed ID: 29506932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robot-assisted knee arthroplasty improves component positioning and alignment, but results are inconclusive on whether it improves clinical scores or reduces complications and revisions: a systematic overview of meta-analyses.
Kort N; Stirling P; Pilot P; Müller JH
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2022 Aug; 30(8):2639-2653. PubMed ID: 33666686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: State-of-the Art and Review of the Literature.
Christ AB; Pearle AD; Mayman DJ; Haas SB
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jul; 33(7):1994-2001. PubMed ID: 29555499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. No differences in mid- to long-term outcomes of computer-assisted navigation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty.
Lee DY; Park YJ; Hwang SC; Park JS; Kang DG
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2020 Oct; 28(10):3183-3192. PubMed ID: 31784782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conventional versus computer-navigated TKA: a prospective randomized study.
Todesca A; Garro L; Penna M; Bejui-Hugues J
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Jun; 25(6):1778-1783. PubMed ID: 27306985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How Large a Study Is Needed to Detect TKA Revision Rate Reductions Attributable to Robotic or Navigated Technologies? A Simulation-based Power Analysis.
Hickey MD; Anglin C; Masri B; Hodgson AJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Nov; 479(11):2350-2361. PubMed ID: 34351313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pros and Cons: A Balanced View of Robotics in Knee Arthroplasty.
Lonner JH; Fillingham YA
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jul; 33(7):2007-2013. PubMed ID: 29680583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Navigated "small implants" in knee reconstruction.
Confalonieri N; Biazzo A; Cerveri P; Pullen C; Manzotti A
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Nov; 24(11):3507-3516. PubMed ID: 27631647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved accuracy of component alignment with the implementation of image-free navigation in total knee arthroplasty.
Rosenberger RE; Hoser C; Quirbach S; Attal R; Hennerbichler A; Fink C
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2008 Mar; 16(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 18157493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes of Computer-Navigated and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Rhee SJ; Kim HJ; Lee CR; Kim CW; Gwak HC; Kim JH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2019 Oct; 101(20):1875-1885. PubMed ID: 31626013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the systemic inflammatory response in conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty versus robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty.
Kayani B; Tahmassebi J; Ayuob A; Konan S; Oussedik S; Haddad FS
Bone Joint J; 2021 Jan; 103-B(1):113-122. PubMed ID: 33380182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer-Assisted Navigation in Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Mathew KK; Marchand KB; Tarazi JM; Salem HS; DeGouveia W; Ehiorobo JO; Sodhi N; Mont MA
Surg Technol Int; 2020 May; 36():323-330. PubMed ID: 32294224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A systematic review of robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: prosthesis design and type should be reported.
Robinson PG; Clement ND; Hamilton D; Blyth MJG; Haddad FS; Patton JT
Bone Joint J; 2019 Jul; 101-B(7):838-847. PubMed ID: 31256672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic-Assisted Versus Manual Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.
Iturriaga C; Salem HS; Ehiorobo JO; Sodhi N; Mont MA
Surg Technol Int; 2020 Nov; 37():275-279. PubMed ID: 32580234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty has a learning curve of seven cases for integration into the surgical workflow but no learning curve effect for accuracy of implant positioning.
Kayani B; Konan S; Huq SS; Tahmassebi J; Haddad FS
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Apr; 27(4):1132-1141. PubMed ID: 30225554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laxity Profiles in the Native and Replaced Knee-Application to Robotic-Assisted Gap-Balancing Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Shalhoub S; Moschetti WE; Dabuzhsky L; Jevsevar DS; Keggi JM; Plaskos C
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Sep; 33(9):3043-3048. PubMed ID: 29909956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Imageless navigation system does not improve component rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty.
Cheng T; Zhang G; Zhang X
J Surg Res; 2011 Dec; 171(2):590-600. PubMed ID: 21176919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does component placement affect short-term clinical outcome in robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty?
Zambianchi F; Franceschi G; Rivi E; Banchelli F; Marcovigi A; Nardacchione R; Ensini A; Catani F
Bone Joint J; 2019 Apr; 101-B(4):435-442. PubMed ID: 30929494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
