352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27601156)
1. Using a social-ecological framework to inform the implementation of conservation plans.
Guerrero AM; Wilson KA
Conserv Biol; 2017 Apr; 31(2):290-301. PubMed ID: 27601156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Understanding the effects of different social data on selecting priority conservation areas.
Karimi A; Tulloch AIT; Brown G; Hockings M
Conserv Biol; 2017 Dec; 31(6):1439-1449. PubMed ID: 28425128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Current practice and future prospects for social data in coastal and ocean planning.
Le Cornu E; Kittinger JN; Koehn JZ; Finkbeiner EM; Crowder LB
Conserv Biol; 2014 Aug; 28(4):902-11. PubMed ID: 24779578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mapping social-ecological vulnerability to inform local decision making.
Thiault L; Marshall P; Gelcich S; Collin A; Chlous F; Claudet J
Conserv Biol; 2018 Apr; 32(2):447-456. PubMed ID: 28714583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Practical actions for applied systematic conservation planning.
Botts EA; Pence G; Holness S; Sink K; Skowno A; Driver A; Harris LR; Desmet P; Escott B; Lötter M; Nel J; Smith T; Daniels F; Sinclair S; Stewart W; Manuel J
Conserv Biol; 2019 Dec; 33(6):1235-1246. PubMed ID: 30912598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incorporating geodiversity into conservation decisions.
Comer PJ; Pressey RL; Hunter ML; Schloss CA; Buttrick SC; Heller NE; Tirpak JM; Faith DP; Cross MS; Shaffer ML
Conserv Biol; 2015 Jun; 29(3):692-701. PubMed ID: 25923052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Knowledge co-production and boundary work to promote implementation of conservation plans.
Nel JL; Roux DJ; Driver A; Hill L; Maherry AC; Snaddon K; Petersen CR; Smith-Adao LB; Van Deventer H; Reyers B
Conserv Biol; 2016 Feb; 30(1):176-88. PubMed ID: 26041340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mainstreaming the social sciences in conservation.
Bennett NJ; Roth R; Klain SC; Chan KM; Clark DA; Cullman G; Epstein G; Nelson MP; Stedman R; Teel TL; Thomas RE; Wyborn C; Curran D; Greenberg A; Sandlos J; Veríssimo D
Conserv Biol; 2017 Feb; 31(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 27334309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Economic and ecological outcomes of flexible biodiversity offset systems.
Habib TJ; Farr DR; Schneider RR; Boutin S
Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1313-23. PubMed ID: 23869724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Building robust conservation plans.
Visconti P; Joppa L
Conserv Biol; 2015 Apr; 29(2):503-12. PubMed ID: 25362995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Incorporating ecological and evolutionary processes into continental-scale conservation planning.
Klein C; Wilson K; Watts M; Stein J; Berry S; Carwardine J; Smith MS; Mackey B; Possingham H
Ecol Appl; 2009 Jan; 19(1):206-17. PubMed ID: 19323184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The value of using feasibility models in systematic conservation planning to predict landholder management uptake.
Tulloch AI; Tulloch VJ; Evans MC; Mills M
Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1462-73. PubMed ID: 25382827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of inverse spatial conservation prioritization to avoid biological diversity loss outside protected areas.
Kareksela S; Moilanen A; Tuominen S; Kotiaho JS
Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1294-303. PubMed ID: 24033397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficient and equitable design of marine protected areas in Fiji through inclusion of stakeholder-specific objectives in conservation planning.
Gurney GG; Pressey RL; Ban NC; Álvarez-Romero JG; Jupiter S; Adams VM
Conserv Biol; 2015 Oct; 29(5):1378-89. PubMed ID: 25916976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Governing trade-offs in ecosystem services and disservices to achieve human-wildlife coexistence.
Ceauşu S; Graves RA; Killion AK; Svenning JC; Carter NH
Conserv Biol; 2019 Jun; 33(3):543-553. PubMed ID: 30350889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reconciling multiple counterfactuals when evaluating biodiversity conservation impact in social-ecological systems.
Bull JW; Strange N; Smith RJ; Gordon A
Conserv Biol; 2021 Apr; 35(2):510-521. PubMed ID: 32538478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors influencing property selection for conservation revolving funds.
Hardy MJ; Fitzsimons JA; Bekessy SA; Gordon A
Conserv Biol; 2018 Apr; 32(2):276-286. PubMed ID: 28726340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A habitat-based approach to predict impacts of marine protected areas on fishers.
Teixeira JB; Moura RL; Mills M; Klein C; Brown CJ; Adams VM; Grantham H; Watts M; Faria D; Amado-Filho GM; Bastos AC; Lourival R; Possingham HP
Conserv Biol; 2018 Oct; 32(5):1096-1106. PubMed ID: 28646574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Applying the dark diversity concept to nature conservation.
Lewis RJ; de Bello F; Bennett JA; Fibich P; Finerty GE; Götzenberger L; Hiiesalu I; Kasari L; Lepš J; Májeková M; Mudrák O; Riibak K; Ronk A; Rychtecká T; Vitová A; Pärtel M
Conserv Biol; 2017 Feb; 31(1):40-47. PubMed ID: 27027266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Restoration planning to guide Aichi targets in a megadiverse country.
Tobón W; Urquiza-Haas T; Koleff P; Schröter M; Ortega-Álvarez R; Campo J; Lindig-Cisneros R; Sarukhán J; Bonn A
Conserv Biol; 2017 Oct; 31(5):1086-1097. PubMed ID: 28233917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
