350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27601156)
21. Integrating biological and social values when prioritizing places for biodiversity conservation.
Whitehead AL; Kujala H; Ives CD; Gordon A; Lentini PE; Wintle BA; Nicholson E; Raymond CM
Conserv Biol; 2014 Aug; 28(4):992-1003. PubMed ID: 24617898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Linkages between measures of biodiversity and community resilience in Pacific Island agroforests.
Ticktin T; Quazi S; Dacks R; Tora M; McGuigan A; Hastings Z; Naikatini A
Conserv Biol; 2018 Oct; 32(5):1085-1095. PubMed ID: 29992628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Characterizing spatial uncertainty when integrating social data in conservation planning.
Lechner AM; Raymond CM; Adams VM; Polyakov M; Gordon A; Rhodes JR; Mills M; Stein A; Ives CD; Lefroy EC
Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1497-511. PubMed ID: 25382071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Scale mismatches, conservation planning, and the value of social-network analyses.
Guerrero AM; McAllister RR; Corcoran J; Wilson KA
Conserv Biol; 2013 Feb; 27(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 23305381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Exposing ecological and economic costs of the research-implementation gap and compromises in decision making.
Kareksela S; Moilanen A; Ristaniemi O; Välivaara R; Kotiaho JS
Conserv Biol; 2018 Feb; 32(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 29139572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Spatial, socio-economic, and ecological implications of incorporating minimum size constraints in marine protected area network design.
Metcalfe K; Vaughan G; Vaz S; Smith RJ
Conserv Biol; 2015 Dec; 29(6):1615-25. PubMed ID: 26219669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Scenario analysis for biodiversity conservation: a social-ecological system approach in the Australian Alps.
Mitchell M; Lockwood M; Moore SA; Clement S
J Environ Manage; 2015 Mar; 150():69-80. PubMed ID: 25438114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Constraints of philanthropy on determining the distribution of biodiversity conservation funding.
Larson ER; Howell S; Kareiva P; Armsworth PR
Conserv Biol; 2016 Feb; 30(1):206-15. PubMed ID: 26460820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Putting people on the map through an approach that integrates social data in conservation planning.
Stephanson SL; Mascia MB
Conserv Biol; 2014 Oct; 28(5):1236-48. PubMed ID: 25102957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Systematic planning of disconnection to enhance conservation success in a modified world.
Hermoso V; Januchowski-Hartley SR; Linke S
Sci Total Environ; 2015 Dec; 536():1038-1044. PubMed ID: 26254022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Conserving biodiversity takes a plan: How planners implement ecological information for biodiversity conservation.
Gagné SA; Bryan-Scaggs K; Boyer RHW; Xiang WN
Ambio; 2020 Sep; 49(9):1490-1505. PubMed ID: 31707581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Integrating priority areas and ecological corridors into national network for conservation planning in China.
Liang J; He X; Zeng G; Zhong M; Gao X; Li X; Li X; Wu H; Feng C; Xing W; Fang Y; Mo D
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jun; 626():22-29. PubMed ID: 29331835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Making habitat connectivity a reality.
Keeley ATH; Basson G; Cameron DR; Heller NE; Huber PR; Schloss CA; Thorne JH; Merenlender AM
Conserv Biol; 2018 Dec; 32(6):1221-1232. PubMed ID: 29920775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Building a stakeholder-led common vision increases the expected cost-effectiveness of biodiversity conservation.
Ponce Reyes R; Firn J; Nicol S; Chadès I; Stratford DS; Martin TG; Whitten S; Carwardine J
PLoS One; 2019; 14(6):e0218093. PubMed ID: 31194779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Use of surrogate species to cost-effectively prioritize conservation actions.
Ward M; Rhodes JR; Watson JEM; Lefevre J; Atkinson S; Possingham HP
Conserv Biol; 2020 Jun; 34(3):600-610. PubMed ID: 31691376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Microtargeting for conservation.
Metcalf AL; Phelan CN; Pallai C; Norton M; Yuhas B; Finley JC; Muth A
Conserv Biol; 2019 Oct; 33(5):1141-1150. PubMed ID: 30887584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparing spatially explicit ecological and social values for natural areas to identify effective conservation strategies.
Bryan BA; Raymond CM; Crossman ND; King D
Conserv Biol; 2011 Feb; 25(1):172-81. PubMed ID: 20825450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Defining the balance point between conservation and development.
Tian D; Xie Y; Barnosky AD; Wei F
Conserv Biol; 2019 Apr; 33(2):231-238. PubMed ID: 30225849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluating complementary networks of restoration plantings for landscape-scale occurrence of temporally dynamic species.
Ikin K; Tulloch A; Gibbons P; Ansell D; Seddon J; Lindenmayer D
Conserv Biol; 2016 Oct; 30(5):1027-37. PubMed ID: 27040452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Power, politics, and culture of marine conservation technology in fisheries.
Jenkins LD
Conserv Biol; 2022 Jun; 36(3):e13855. PubMed ID: 34705301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
