128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27601607)
1. Medicare challenge heads to trial.
Vogel L
CMAJ; 2016 Oct; 188(14):E331-E332. PubMed ID: 27601607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. BC refutes Charter challenge of medicare.
Mertl S
CMAJ; 2016 Oct; 188(15):E369-E370. PubMed ID: 27647614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Intervenors decry Charter challenge of medicare.
Mertl S
CMAJ; 2016 Oct; 188(15):E371. PubMed ID: 27647612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Public health care challenged in BC court.
Mertl S
CMAJ; 2016 Oct; 188(14):E333-E334. PubMed ID: 27620633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Just Medicare: the role of Canadian courts in determining health care rights and access.
Flood CM
J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(4):669-80. PubMed ID: 16686238
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Private health care in Canada.
Steinbrook R
N Engl J Med; 2006 Apr; 354(16):1661-4. PubMed ID: 16625005
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Private health insurance: an international overview and considerations for Canada.
Dhalla I
Healthc Q; 2007; 10(4):89-96. PubMed ID: 18274001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Supreme Court slaps for-sale sign on medicare.
McFarlane L
CMAJ; 2005 Aug; 173(3):269-70. PubMed ID: 15967948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Chaoulli case: one-tier medicine goes on trial in Quebec.
Pinker S
CMAJ; 1999 Nov; 161(10):1305-6. PubMed ID: 10584098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Private medical care comes to Canada.
CMAJ; 2005 Aug; 173(3):225, 227. PubMed ID: 16076799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Lament for a health care system.
CMAJ; 2005 Jul; 173(2):117, 119. PubMed ID: 16027410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [A discussion forum on health insurance: the Athenaeum of Madrid conferences, 1934].
Porras Gallo MI
Asclepio; 1999; 51(1):159-83. PubMed ID: 19388187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Health insurance - private or legally mandated? Choosing a suitable insurance group].
Aktuelle Urol; 2014 Sep; 45(5):361-2. PubMed ID: 25275690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Chaoulli decision: a debate in which physicians must be heard.
Ouellet R
CMAJ; 2005 Oct; 173(8):896. PubMed ID: 16217113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [A dual system cannot survive forever].
Baas J
MMW Fortschr Med; 2014 Oct; 156(17):16. PubMed ID: 25417455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [The responsibilities of the private health insurance company doctor - a balancing act].
Ostendorf GM
Versicherungsmedizin; 2014 Jun; 66(2):65. PubMed ID: 25000625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality v. equality: the divided court in Chaoulli v. Quebec.
Yeo M; Lucock C
Health Law J; 2006; 14():129-50. PubMed ID: 17563960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Canada's challenge for health.
Lancet; 2005 Jun 25-Jul 1; 365(9478):2152. PubMed ID: 15986541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The government responds to the Chaoulli/Zeliotis judgment, easing open the door to privatization.
Perspect Infirm; 2006; 3(5 Suppl):1, 3. PubMed ID: 16776035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The construction of health care and the ideology of the private in Canadian constitutional law.
Lessard H
Ann Health Law; 1993; 2():121-59. PubMed ID: 10139964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
