365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27602011)
1. A Mind-Reader Does Not Always Have Deontological Moral Judgments and Prosocial Behavior: A Developmental Perspective.
Hao J; Liu Y
Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1261. PubMed ID: 27602011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. At the heart of morality lies neuro-visceral integration: lower cardiac vagal tone predicts utilitarian moral judgment.
Park G; Kappes A; Rho Y; Van Bavel JJ
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1588-96. PubMed ID: 27317926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What makes moral dilemma judgments "utilitarian" or "deontological"?
Gawronski B; Beer JS
Soc Neurosci; 2017 Dec; 12(6):626-632. PubMed ID: 27745112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sacrificial utilitarian judgments do reflect concern for the greater good: Clarification via process dissociation and the judgments of philosophers.
Conway P; Goldstein-Greenwood J; Polacek D; Greene JD
Cognition; 2018 Oct; 179():241-265. PubMed ID: 30064654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of moral commitments in moral judgment.
Lombrozo T
Cogn Sci; 2009 Mar; 33(2):273-86. PubMed ID: 21585471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Age Changes in Prosocial Responding and Moral Reasoning in Adolescence and Early Adulthood.
Eisenberg N; Cumberland A; Guthrie IK; Murphy BC; Shepard SA
J Res Adolesc; 2005; 15(3):235-260. PubMed ID: 20592955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Moral imagination: Facilitating prosocial decision-making through scene imagery and theory of mind.
Gaesser B; Keeler K; Young L
Cognition; 2018 Feb; 171():180-193. PubMed ID: 29178984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Personality and moral judgment: Curious consequentialists and polite deontologists.
Smillie LD; Katic M; Laham SM
J Pers; 2021 May; 89(3):549-564. PubMed ID: 33025607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Culture, theory-of-mind, and morality: How independent and interdependent minds make moral judgments.
Park B; Vepachedu S; Keshava P; Minns S
Biol Psychol; 2022 Oct; 174():108423. PubMed ID: 36075489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Beyond Affective Influences on Deontological Moral Judgment: The Role of Motivations for Prevention in the Moral Condemnation of Harm.
Gamez-Djokic M; Molden D
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1522-1537. PubMed ID: 27655753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Why People With High Alexithymia Make More Utilitarian Judgments.
Zhang X; Wu Z; Li S; Lai J; Han M; Chen X; Liu C; Ding D
Exp Psychol; 2020 Jan; 67(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 32520665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Inference of trustworthiness from intuitive moral judgments.
Everett JA; Pizarro DA; Crockett MJ
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Jun; 145(6):772-87. PubMed ID: 27054685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aggressive and prosocial children's emotion attributions and moral reasoning.
Malti T; Gasser L; Buchmann M
Aggress Behav; 2009; 35(1):90-102. PubMed ID: 18985747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Brazilian adolescents' prosocial moral judgment and behavior: relations to sympathy, perspective taking, gender-role orientation, and demographic characteristics.
Eisenberg N; Zhou Q; Koller S
Child Dev; 2001; 72(2):518-34. PubMed ID: 11333082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fickle Judgments in Moral Dilemmas: Time Pressure and Utilitarian Judgments in an Interdependent Culture.
Hashimoto H; Maeda K; Matsumura K
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():795732. PubMed ID: 35310271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How Much Is Enough? The Relationship Between Prosocial Effort and Moral Character Judgments.
Berry Z; Lucas BJ
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2024 May; 50(5):659-678. PubMed ID: 36575959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: a process dissociation approach.
Conway P; Gawronski B
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Feb; 104(2):216-35. PubMed ID: 23276267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gender differences in responses to moral dilemmas: a process dissociation analysis.
Friesdorf R; Conway P; Gawronski B
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 May; 41(5):696-713. PubMed ID: 25840987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Latent Fairness in Adults' Relationship-Based Moral Judgments.
Hao J; Liu Y; Li J
Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1871. PubMed ID: 26696935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Weighing outcome vs. intent across societies: How cultural models of mind shape moral reasoning.
McNamara RA; Willard AK; Norenzayan A; Henrich J
Cognition; 2019 Jan; 182():95-108. PubMed ID: 30227333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
