BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2760284)

  • 21. Auditory brainstem responses to CE-Chirp® stimuli for normal ears and those with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Cho SW; Han KH; Jang HK; Chang SO; Jung H; Lee JH
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(10):700-4. PubMed ID: 25997814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Auditory brainstem responses in 10 inbred strains of mice.
    Zhou X; Jen PH; Seburn KL; Frankel WN; Zheng QY
    Brain Res; 2006 May; 1091(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 16516865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of high-pass filtering on the waveform and threshold of auditory brainstem responses to tone pips.
    Maurizi M; Paludetti G; Ottaviani F; Rosignoli M
    Audiology; 1986; 25(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 3707437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Normative auditory brainstem response data for hearing threshold in the rabbit.
    Stieve M; Mojallal H; Winter M; Battmer R; Lenarz T
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11(5):310-7. PubMed ID: 16847386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Threshold characteristics of the human auditory brain stem response.
    Elberling C; Don M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jan; 81(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 3819168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Brainstem auditory-evoked response in the rat. Normative studies, with observations concerning the effects of ossicular disruption.
    Burkard R; Feldman M; Voigt HF
    Audiology; 1990; 29(3):146-62. PubMed ID: 2383214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Auditory brainstem responses to clicks and tone bursts in C57 BL/6J mice.
    Scimemi P; Santarelli R; Selmo A; Mammano F
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2014 Aug; 34(4):264-71. PubMed ID: 25210221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The auditory brainstem response in two lizard species.
    Brittan-Powell EF; Christensen-Dalsgaard J; Tang Y; Carr C; Dooling RJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):787-94. PubMed ID: 20707448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Auditory brainstem and middle latency responses. I. Effect of response filtering and waveform identification. II. Threshold responses to a 500-HZ tone pip.
    Kavanagh KT; Harker LA; Tyler RS
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1984; 108():1-12. PubMed ID: 6421220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Brainstem auditory-evoked responses. Normal variation as a function of stimulus and subject characteristics.
    Stockard JE; Stockard JJ; Westmoreland BF; Corfits JL
    Arch Neurol; 1979 Dec; 36(13):823-31. PubMed ID: 508145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Depth evoked potential and single unit correlates of vertex midlatency auditory evoked responses.
    Hinman CL; Buchwald JS
    Brain Res; 1983 Mar; 264(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 6850290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Effect of stimulus rise time and high-pass masking on early auditory evoked potentials].
    Bunke D; von Specht H; Mühler R; Pethe J; Kevanishvili Z
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Apr; 77(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 9592750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Brainstem electrical responses from selected tone pip stimuli.
    Wood MH; Seitz MR; Jacobson JT
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(3):156-62. PubMed ID: 528293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Temporary threshold shifts induced by low-pass and high-pass filtered noises in fetal sheep in utero.
    Huang X; Gerhardt KJ; Abrams RM; Antonelli PJ
    Hear Res; 1997 Nov; 113(1-2):173-81. PubMed ID: 9387996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparing auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to toneburst and narrow band CE-chirp in young infants.
    Rodrigues GR; Ramos N; Lewis DR
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Sep; 77(9):1555-60. PubMed ID: 23915488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Auditory brainstem responses to tonal stimuli in young and aging rats.
    Cooper WA; Coleman JR; Newton EH
    Hear Res; 1990 Jan; 43(2-3):171-9. PubMed ID: 2312412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Auditory steady-state evoked potentials (ASSEPs): a study of optimal stimulation parameters for frequency-specific threshold measurement in dogs.
    Markessis E; Poncelet L; Colin C; Coppens A; Hoonhorst I; Deggouj N; Deltenre P
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Aug; 117(8):1760-71. PubMed ID: 16798083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Auditory brainstem responses by click stimuli via an earphone--comparison with a headphone].
    Yoshiko K; Fujita Y
    Rinsho Byori; 1994 Dec; 42(12):1287-93. PubMed ID: 7869594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses to clicks masked by notched noise.
    van Zanten GA; Brocaar MP
    Audiology; 1984; 23(3):253-64. PubMed ID: 6732630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Stimulus artefact reduction systems for the TDH-49 headphone in the recording of auditory evoked potentials.
    Cooper WA; Parker DJ
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(6):283-93. PubMed ID: 7308604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.