These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27603438)

  • 41. The impact of negative attentional set upon target processing in RSVP: an ERP study.
    Zhang D; Zhou X; Martens S
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2604-14. PubMed ID: 19465037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Insights into the control of attentional set in ADHD using the attentional blink paradigm.
    Mason DJ; Humphreys GW; Kent L
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2005 Dec; 46(12):1345-53. PubMed ID: 16313435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Absence of attentional capture in parallel search is possible: a failure to replicate attentional capture in a non-singleton target search task.
    Wienrich C; Janczyk M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2044-52. PubMed ID: 21805210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Context-dependent control of attention capture: Evidence from proportion congruent effects.
    Crump MJC; Milliken B; Leboe-McGowan J; Leboe-McGowan L; Gao X
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2018 Jun; 72(2):91-104. PubMed ID: 29389144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Attentional engagement is not sufficient to prevent spatial capture.
    Zivony A; Lamy D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jan; 76(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 24043565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce nonspatial filtering costs.
    Wykowska A; Schubö A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):645-60. PubMed ID: 19929330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Taking a closer look at visual search: Just how feature-agnostic is singleton detection mode?
    Harris AM; Jacoby O; Remington RW; Travis SL; Mattingley JB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Apr; 81(3):654-665. PubMed ID: 30603988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The allocation of resources in visual working memory and multiple attentional templates.
    Kerzel D; Witzel C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):645-658. PubMed ID: 30920252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Competition for representation is mediated by relative attentional salience.
    Mounts JR; Tomaselli RG
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Mar; 118(3):261-75. PubMed ID: 15698824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Attentional control within 3-D space.
    Theeuwes J; Atchley P; Kramer AF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Oct; 24(5):1476-85. PubMed ID: 9988599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Constraints on dilution from a narrow attentional zoom reveal how spatial and color cues direct selection.
    Chen Z; Cave KR
    Vision Res; 2014 Aug; 101():125-37. PubMed ID: 24973562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Attentional capture by abrupt onsets and feature singletons produces inhibitory surrounds.
    Mounts JR
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Oct; 62(7):1485-93. PubMed ID: 11143458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The control of attentional target selection in a colour/colour conjunction task.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2383-2396. PubMed ID: 27357843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Neural mechanisms of divided feature-selective attention to colour.
    Martinovic J; Wuerger SM; Hillyard SA; Müller MM; Andersen SK
    Neuroimage; 2018 Nov; 181():670-682. PubMed ID: 30048748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Oculomotor capture by colour singletons depends on intertrial priming.
    Becker SI
    Vision Res; 2010 Oct; 50(21):2116-26. PubMed ID: 20691720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Involuntary transfer of a top-down attentional set into the focus of attention: evidence from a contingent attentional capture paradigm.
    Moore KS; Weissman DH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1495-509. PubMed ID: 20675796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Temporal attentional capture: effects of irrelevant singletons on rapid serial visual search.
    Dalton P; Lavie N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):881-5. PubMed ID: 17328389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The inferior temporal lobe mediates distracter-resistant visual search of patients with spatial neglect.
    Ptak R; Valenza N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 May; 17(5):788-99. PubMed ID: 15904545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The attentional blink: A relational accountof attentional engagement.
    Becker SI; Manoharan RT; Folk CL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Feb; 28(1):219-227. PubMed ID: 32989720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Salient-but-irrelevant stimuli cause attentional capture in difficult, but attentional suppression in easy visual search.
    Barras C; Kerzel D
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Dec; 54(12):1826-1838. PubMed ID: 28752665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.