These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2760359)

  • 1. A comparison of six epicutaneous devices in the performance of immediate hypersensitivity skin testing.
    Adinoff AD; Rosloniec DM; McCall LL; Nelson HS
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1989 Aug; 84(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 2760359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the sensitivity and precision of four skin test devices.
    Engler DB; DeJarnatt AC; Sim TC; Lee JL; Grant JA
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1992 Dec; 90(6 Pt 1):985-91. PubMed ID: 1460202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the Multi-Test device for immediate hypersensitivity skin testing.
    Berkowitz RB; Tinkelman DG; Lutz C; Crummie A; Smith K
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1992 Dec; 90(6 Pt 1):979-85. PubMed ID: 1460201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the Quintest to the lancet in allergic skin testing.
    Carrozzi FM; Byth K; Katelaris CH
    Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol; 1998 Dec; 16(4):149-54. PubMed ID: 10219895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparison of 4 skin prick tests to detect immediate hypersensitivity].
    Ortega Cisneros M; Ramos García BC; del Río Navarro BE; Sienra Monge JJ
    Rev Alerg Mex; 1998; 45(2):36-42. PubMed ID: 9650494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative performance of five commercial prick skin test devices.
    Nelson HS; Rosloniec DM; McCall LI; Iklé D
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1993 Nov; 92(5):750-6. PubMed ID: 8227867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of three methods for using the Duotip-Test device for skin testing.
    Sangsupawanich P; Chamnanphol S; Koonrungsrisomboon D
    Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol; 2000 Sep; 18(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 11270470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The allergy pricker. Qualitative aspects of skin prick testing using a precision needle.
    Malling HJ; Andersen CE; Boas MB; Holgersen F; Munch EP; Weeke B
    Allergy; 1982 Nov; 37(8):563-7. PubMed ID: 7181052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative performance for immediate hypersensitivity skin testing using two skin prick test devices.
    Rizzo MC; Naspitz CK; Solé D
    J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol; 1995; 5(6):354-6. PubMed ID: 8653226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of a new lancet and a hypodermic needle for skin prick testing.
    Dirksen A; Mosbech H; Søborg M; Biering I
    Allergy; 1983 Jul; 38(5):359-62. PubMed ID: 6614408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity and reproducibility of multi-test skin test device.
    Mahan C; Spectror S; Siegel S; Rachelefsky G; Katz R; Rohr A
    Ann Allergy; 1993 Jul; 71(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 8328708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of two disposable plastic skin test devices with the bifurcated needle for epicutaneous allergy testing.
    Corder WT; Hogan MB; Wilson NW
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1996 Sep; 77(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 8814048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of three methods of using the DermaPIK with the standard prick method for epicutaneous skin testing.
    Corder WT; Wilson NW
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1995 Nov; 75(5):434-8. PubMed ID: 7583866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of devices for skin prick testing.
    Nelson HS; Lahr J; Buchmeier A; McCormick D
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1998 Feb; 101(2 Pt 1):153-6. PubMed ID: 9500746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Lancet Weight Determines Wheal Diameter in Response to Skin Prick Testing with Histamine.
    Andersen HH; Lundgaard AC; Petersen AS; Hauberg LE; Sharma N; Hansen SD; Elberling J; Arendt-Nielsen L
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0156211. PubMed ID: 27213613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [COMPARISON OF WHEAL SIZE INDUCED BY BIFURCATED NEEDLE
    Masukane S; Matsui T; Tokumo N; Makino A; Kitamura K; Takasato Y; Sugiura S; Ito K
    Arerugi; 2022; 71(5):389-396. PubMed ID: 35831164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variables in allergy skin testing.
    Nelson HS
    Allergy Proc; 1994; 15(6):265-8. PubMed ID: 7721073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Precision of skin prick and puncture tests with nine methods.
    Demoly P; Bousquet J; Manderscheid JC; Dreborg S; Dhivert H; Michel FB
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1991 Nov; 88(5):758-62. PubMed ID: 1955634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Skin prick test responses to codeine, histamine, and ragweed utilizing the Multitest device.
    Lin RY; Erlich ER; Don PC
    Ann Allergy; 1990 Sep; 65(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 2403228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance and Pain Tolerability of Current Diagnostic Allergy Skin Prick Test Devices.
    Tversky JR; Chelladurai Y; McGready J; Hamilton RG
    J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract; 2015; 3(6):888-93. PubMed ID: 26553615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.