These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2760359)

  • 21. Effect of distance between sites and region of the body on results of skin prick tests.
    Nelson HS; Knoetzer J; Bucher B
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1996 Feb; 97(2):596-601. PubMed ID: 8621844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of the Multi-Test II and ComforTen allergy skin test devices.
    Dykewicz MS; Dooms KT; Chassaing DL
    Allergy Asthma Proc; 2011; 32(3):198-202. PubMed ID: 21703099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Skin testing for immediate hypersensitivity to corticosteroids: a case series and literature review.
    Baker A; Empson M; The R; Fitzharris P
    Clin Exp Allergy; 2015 Mar; 45(3):669-76. PubMed ID: 25346233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [The comparison of reactions in skin prick test performed with the standardized lancet and the injection needle].
    Semik-Orzech A; Barczyk A; Pierzchała W
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2008 Jun; 24(144):495-501. PubMed ID: 18702329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Skin test reactivity in infancy.
    Ménardo JL; Bousquet J; Rodière M; Astruc J; Michel FB
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1985 Jun; 75(6):646-51. PubMed ID: 2409121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of five techniques of skin prick tests used routinely in Europe.
    Masse MS; Granger Vallée A; Chiriac A; Dhivert-Donnadieu H; Bousquet-Rouanet L; Bousquet PJ; Demoly P
    Allergy; 2011 Nov; 66(11):1415-9. PubMed ID: 21797883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Standardization of the prick test. A comparative study of three methods.
    Basomba A; Sastre A; Peláez A; Romar A; Campos A; García-Villalmanzo A
    Allergy; 1985 Aug; 40(6):395-9. PubMed ID: 4051141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Pain perception and performance of three devices for single-site allergen skin testing.
    Nelson HS; Lopez P; Curran-Everett D
    Allergy Asthma Proc; 2014; 35(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 24433598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Performances of an improved device for skin prick tests.
    Caimmi D; Masse MS; Chiriac AM; Demoly P
    Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol; 2013; 26(1):235-7. PubMed ID: 23527727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Atopic skin test re-evaluated. X. Comparison of a perfected technique of intracutaneous skin testing and the prick test performed with a modified Morrow Brown Needle.
    Nierop G; Voorhorst R; De Vijver RL
    Ann Allergy; 1981 Feb; 46(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 7469129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Skin prick testing using allergen-coated lancets: a comparison between a multiple lancet device and a single lancet applied with varying pressures.
    Phagoo SB; Wilson NM; Silverman M
    Clin Exp Allergy; 1991 Sep; 21(5):589-93. PubMed ID: 1742651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of test devices for skin prick testing.
    Carr WW; Martin B; Howard RS; Cox L; Borish L;
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2005 Aug; 116(2):341-6. PubMed ID: 16108145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of the Multi-Test II and Skintestor Omni allergy skin test devices.
    Dykewicz MS; Lemmon JK; Keaney DL
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2007 Jun; 98(6):559-62. PubMed ID: 17601269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reproducibility of skin prick test results in epidemiologic studies: a comparison of two devices.
    Illi S; Garcia-Marcos L; Hernando V; Guillen JJ; Liese A; von Mutius E
    Allergy; 1998 Apr; 53(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 9574876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of Duotip-Test.
    Stryk SV; Slavin RG
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1997 Jan; 99(1 Pt 1):149-50. PubMed ID: 9003223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of three prick test methods with the intradermal test and with the rast in the diagnosis of mite allergy.
    Ménardo JL; Bousquet J; Michel FB
    Ann Allergy; 1982 Apr; 48(4):235-9. PubMed ID: 7073028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of two single-headed and two multi-headed allergen skin test devices.
    Yoon IK; Martin BL; Carr WW; ;
    Allergy Asthma Proc; 2006; 27(6):473-8. PubMed ID: 17176781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Allergic skin disease: investigation of both immediate- and delayed-type hypersensitivity is essential.
    Usmani N; Wilkinson SM
    Clin Exp Allergy; 2007 Oct; 37(10):1541-6. PubMed ID: 17883733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Skin testing: making the most of every prick.
    Wood RA
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2002 Apr; 88(4):347-9. PubMed ID: 11991551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reliability of allergy skin testing.
    Shtessel M; Tversky J
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2018 Jan; 120(1):80-83. PubMed ID: 29273134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.