31 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27604104)
1. Metabolomics Reveals that Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Activation by Environmental Chemicals Induces Systemic Metabolic Dysfunction in Mice.
Zhang L; Hatzakis E; Nichols RG; Hao R; Correll J; Smith PB; Chiaro CR; Perdew GH; Patterson AD
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(13):8067-77. PubMed ID: 26023891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Model systems and organisms for addressing inter- and intra-species variability in risk assessment.
Rusyn I; Chiu WA; Wright FA
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2022 Jul; 132():105197. PubMed ID: 35636685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New Rodent Population Models May Inform Human Health Risk Assessment and Identification of Genetic Susceptibility to Environmental Exposures.
Harrill AH; McAllister KA
Environ Health Perspect; 2017 Aug; 125(8):086002. PubMed ID: 28886592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen production is dependent on the aromatic hydrocarbon receptor.
Senft AP; Dalton TP; Nebert DW; Genter MB; Puga A; Hutchinson RJ; Kerzee JK; Uno S; Shertzer HG
Free Radic Biol Med; 2002 Nov; 33(9):1268-78. PubMed ID: 12398935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Novel role of hnRNP-A2/B1 in modulating aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand sensitivity.
Cho SW; Suzuki K; Miura Y; Miyazaki T; Nose M; Iwata H; Kim EY
Arch Toxicol; 2015 Nov; 89(11):2027-38. PubMed ID: 25224401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) is required for dioxin-induced hepatotoxicity but not for the induction of the Cyp1a1 and Cyp1a2 genes.
Nukaya M; Lin BC; Glover E; Moran SM; Kennedy GD; Bradfield CA
J Biol Chem; 2010 Nov; 285(46):35599-605. PubMed ID: 20829355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retention and maternal transfer of brominated dioxins in zebrafish (Danio rerio) and effects on reproduction, aryl hydrocarbon receptor-regulated genes, and ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) activity.
Haldén AN; Arnoldsson K; Haglund P; Mattsson A; Ullerås E; Sturve J; Norrgren L
Aquat Toxicol; 2011 Apr; 102(3-4):150-61. PubMed ID: 21356177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of immunotoxicity among tetrachloro-, pentachloro-, tetrabromo- and pentabromo-dibenzo-p-dioxins in mice.
Ao K; Suzuki T; Murai H; Matsumoto M; Nagai H; Miyamoto Y; Tohyama C; Nohara K
Toxicology; 2009 Feb; 256(1-2):25-31. PubMed ID: 19041680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Strain differences in the proteome of dioxin-sensitive and dioxin-resistant mice treated with 2,3,7,8-tetrabromodibenzo-p-dioxin.
Nguyen HT; Tsuchiya MC; Yoo J; Iida M; Agusa T; Hirano M; Kim EY; Miyazaki T; Nose M; Iwata H
Arch Toxicol; 2017 Apr; 91(4):1763-1782. PubMed ID: 27604104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Carcinogenic risks of dioxin: mechanistic considerations.
Schwarz M; Appel KE
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Oct; 43(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 16054739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interactions of procarcinogenic heterocyclic amines and indolocarbazoles with the dioxin receptor.
Kleman M; Gustafsson JA
Biol Chem; 1996 Nov; 377(11):741-62. PubMed ID: 8960375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting the sensitivity of fishes to dioxin-like compounds: possible role of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) ligand binding domain.
Doering JA; Giesy JP; Wiseman S; Hecker M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2013 Mar; 20(3):1219-24. PubMed ID: 23054770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
