1844 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27604226)
1. Estimating Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in a Free-Living Context: A Pragmatic Comparison of Consumer-Based Activity Trackers and ActiGraph Accelerometry.
Gomersall SR; Ng N; Burton NW; Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Brown WJ
J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e239. PubMed ID: 27604226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Concurrent validity of the Fitbit for assessing sedentary behavior and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity.
Redenius N; Kim Y; Byun W
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Feb; 19(1):29. PubMed ID: 30732582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimating physical activity and sedentary behaviour in a free-living environment: A comparative study between Fitbit Charge 2 and Actigraph GT3X.
Mikkelsen MK; Berg-Beckhoff G; Frederiksen P; Horgan G; O'Driscoll R; Palmeira AL; Scott SE; Stubbs J; Heitmann BL; Larsen SC
PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234426. PubMed ID: 32525912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure.
Imboden MT; Nelson MB; Kaminsky LA; Montoye AH
Br J Sports Med; 2018 Jul; 52(13):844-850. PubMed ID: 28483930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Low-Cost Consumer-Based Trackers to Measure Physical Activity and Sleep Duration Among Adults in Free-Living Conditions: Validation Study.
Degroote L; Hamerlinck G; Poels K; Maher C; Crombez G; De Bourdeaudhuij I; Vandendriessche A; Curtis RG; DeSmet A
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 May; 8(5):e16674. PubMed ID: 32282332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study.
Sjöberg V; Westergren J; Monnier A; Lo Martire R; Hagströmer M; Äng BO; Vixner L
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e24806. PubMed ID: 33433391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of wrist-worn Fitbit Flex and waist-worn ActiGraph for measuring steps in free-living adults.
Chu AH; Ng SH; Paknezhad M; Gauterin A; Koh D; Brown MS; Müller-Riemenschneider F
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172535. PubMed ID: 28234953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of free-living physical activity measurements between ActiGraph GT3X-BT and Fitbit Charge 3 in young people with haemophilia.
Matlary RED; Holme PA; Glosli H; Rueegg CS; Grydeland M
Haemophilia; 2022 Nov; 28(6):e172-e180. PubMed ID: 35830613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validity Evaluation of the Fitbit Charge2 and the Garmin vivosmart HR+ in Free-Living Environments in an Older Adult Cohort.
Tedesco S; Sica M; Ancillao A; Timmons S; Barton J; O'Flynn B
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Jun; 7(6):e13084. PubMed ID: 31219048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validating Fitbit Zip for monitoring physical activity of children in school: a cross-sectional study.
Mooses K; Oja M; Reisberg S; Vilo J; Kull M
BMC Public Health; 2018 Jul; 18(1):858. PubMed ID: 29996797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The validity of consumer-level, activity monitors in healthy adults worn in free-living conditions: a cross-sectional study.
Ferguson T; Rowlands AV; Olds T; Maher C
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Mar; 12():42. PubMed ID: 25890168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of the Fitbit Charge 2 compared to the ActiGraph GT3X+ in older adults with knee osteoarthritis in free-living conditions.
Collins JE; Yang HY; Trentadue TP; Gong Y; Losina E
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0211231. PubMed ID: 30699159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Validation Study of the Fitbit One in Daily Life Using Different Time Intervals.
Middelweerd A; VAN DER Ploeg HP; VAN Halteren A; Twisk JWR; Brug J; Te Velde SJ
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2017 Jun; 49(6):1270-1279. PubMed ID: 28511193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comprehensive comparison of Apple Watch and Fitbit monitors in a free-living setting.
Bai Y; Tompkins C; Gell N; Dione D; Zhang T; Byun W
PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251975. PubMed ID: 34038458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of the Fitbit One, Garmin Vivofit and Jawbone UP activity tracker in estimation of energy expenditure during treadmill walking and running.
Price K; Bird SR; Lythgo N; Raj IS; Wong JY; Lynch C
J Med Eng Technol; 2017 Apr; 41(3):208-215. PubMed ID: 27919170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Accuracy of Smart Devices for Measuring Physical Activity in Daily Life: Validation Study.
Degroote L; De Bourdeaudhuij I; Verloigne M; Poppe L; Crombez G
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2018 Dec; 6(12):e10972. PubMed ID: 30545810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity and reliability of Fitbit activity monitors compared to ActiGraph GT3X+ with female adults in a free-living environment.
Reid RER; Insogna JA; Carver TE; Comptour AM; Bewski NA; Sciortino C; Andersen RE
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Jun; 20(6):578-582. PubMed ID: 27887786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Twenty-four Hours of Sleep, Sedentary Behavior, and Physical Activity with Nine Wearable Devices.
Rosenberger ME; Buman MP; Haskell WL; McConnell MV; Carstensen LL
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Mar; 48(3):457-65. PubMed ID: 26484953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers.
Evenson KR; Goto MM; Furberg RD
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Dec; 12():159. PubMed ID: 26684758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Physical Activity Assessment Between Consumer- and Research-Grade Accelerometers: A Comparative Study in Free-Living Conditions.
Dominick GM; Winfree KN; Pohlig RT; Papas MA
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2016 Sep; 4(3):e110. PubMed ID: 27644334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
