317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27604355)
1. Cell Proliferation and Cytotoxicity Assays.
Adan A; Kiraz Y; Baran Y
Curr Pharm Biotechnol; 2016; 17(14):1213-1221. PubMed ID: 27604355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cell viability and cytotoxicity assays: Biochemical elements and cellular compartments.
Khalef L; Lydia R; Filicia K; Moussa B
Cell Biochem Funct; 2024 Apr; 42(3):e4007. PubMed ID: 38593323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. ATP-based cell viability assay is superior to trypan blue exclusion and XTT assay in measuring cytotoxicity of anticancer drugs Taxol and Imatinib, and proteasome inhibitor MG-132 on human hepatoma cell line HepG2.
Nowak E; Kammerer S; Küpper JH
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2018; 69(1-2):327-336. PubMed ID: 29630545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High-content image analysis (HCIA) assay has the highest correlation with direct counting cell suspension compared to the ATP, WST-8 and Alamar blue assays for measurement of cytotoxicity.
Tahara H; Matsuda S; Yamamoto Y; Yoshizawa H; Fujita M; Katsuoka Y; Kasahara T
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2017 Nov; 88(Pt 1):92-99. PubMed ID: 28807796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A cytotoxicity assay utilizing a fluorescent dye that determines accurate surviving fractions of cells.
Sellers JR; Cook S; Goldmacher VS
J Immunol Methods; 1994 Jun; 172(2):255-64. PubMed ID: 8034974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cytotoxicity as measured by trypan blue as a potentially confounding variable in the in vitro alkaline elution/rat hepatocyte assay.
Elia MC; Storer RD; Harmon LS; Kraynak AR; McKelvey TW; Hertzog PR; Keenan KP; DeLuca JG; Nichols WW
Mutat Res; 1993 Jun; 291(3):193-205. PubMed ID: 7685060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cytotoxicity Assays as Predictors of the Safety and Efficacy of Antimicrobial Agents.
Zipperer A; Kretschmer D
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1520():107-118. PubMed ID: 27873248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cell viability assays: introduction.
Stoddart MJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 740():1-6. PubMed ID: 21468961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of trypan blue dye exclusion and fluorometric assays for mammalian cell viability determinations.
Altman SA; Randers L; Rao G
Biotechnol Prog; 1993; 9(6):671-4. PubMed ID: 7764357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of different cytotoxicity assays for in vitro evaluation of mesoporous silica nanoparticles.
Braun K; Stürzel CM; Biskupek J; Kaiser U; Kirchhoff F; Lindén M
Toxicol In Vitro; 2018 Oct; 52():214-221. PubMed ID: 29940343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cellular chemosensitivity assays: an overview.
Sumantran VN
Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 731():219-36. PubMed ID: 21516411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Parameters for evaluation of viability assays: accuracy, precision, specificity, sensitivity, and standardization.
Bank HL; Schmehl MK
Cryobiology; 1989 Jun; 26(3):203-11. PubMed ID: 2743784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Determination of Cytotoxicity.
Prog Drug Res; 2016; 71():159-61. PubMed ID: 26939283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of dye exclusion assays with a clonogenic assay in the determination of drug-induced cytotoxicity.
Weisenthal LM; Dill PL; Kurnick NB; Lippman ME
Cancer Res; 1983 Jan; 43(1):258-64. PubMed ID: 6571706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of uptake, cytotoxicity and inflammatory effects in respiratory cells exposed to pristine and -OH and -COOH functionalized multi-wall carbon nanotubes.
Ursini CL; Maiello R; Ciervo A; Fresegna AM; Buresti G; Superti F; Marchetti M; Iavicoli S; Cavallo D
J Appl Toxicol; 2016 Mar; 36(3):394-403. PubMed ID: 26370214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro methods for detecting cytotoxicity.
Ehrich M; Sharova L
Curr Protoc Toxicol; 2001 May; Chapter 2():Unit 2.6. PubMed ID: 23045046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of tumor and endothelial cell viability and survival using sulforhodamine B and clonogenic assays.
Woolston C; Martin S
Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 740():45-56. PubMed ID: 21468967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Experimental and computational approach to establish fit-for-purpose cell viability assays.
Pierce L; Anderson H; Sarkar S; Bauer SR; Sarkar S
Regen Med; 2024 Jan; 19(1):27-45. PubMed ID: 38247346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Limitations of the fluorescent probe viability assay.
Massaro EJ; Elstein KH; Zucker RM; Bair KW
Mol Toxicol; 1989; 2(4):271-84. PubMed ID: 2490980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Honey is cytotoxic towards prostate cancer cells but interacts with the MTT reagent: Considerations for the choice of cell viability assay.
Abel SDA; Baird SK
Food Chem; 2018 Feb; 241():70-78. PubMed ID: 28958561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
