These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Within-subject consistency and between-subject variability in Bayesian reasoning strategies. Cohen AL; Staub A Cogn Psychol; 2015 Sep; 81():26-47. PubMed ID: 26354671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intuitive reasoning about probability: theoretical and experimental analyses of the "problem of three prisoners". Shimojo S; Ichikawa SI Cognition; 1989 Jun; 32(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 2752704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do smart people have better intuitions? Thompson VA; Pennycook G; Trippas D; Evans JSBT J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Jul; 147(7):945-961. PubMed ID: 29975089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Asking better questions: How presentation formats influence information search. Wu CM; Meder B; Filimon F; Nelson JD J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1274-1297. PubMed ID: 28318286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimation of post-test probabilities by residents: Bayesian reasoning versus heuristics? Hall S; Phang SH; Schaefer JP; Ghali W; Wright B; McLaughlin K Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2014 Aug; 19(3):393-402. PubMed ID: 24449125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Base rates: both neglected and intuitive. Pennycook G; Trippas D; Handley SJ; Thompson VA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Mar; 40(2):544-54. PubMed ID: 24219086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of causal models in multiple judgments under uncertainty. Hayes BK; Hawkins GE; Newell BR; Pasqualino M; Rehder B Cognition; 2014 Dec; 133(3):611-20. PubMed ID: 25238316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Context-Dependent Bayesian Account for Causal-Based Categorization. Marchant N; Quillien T; Chaigneau SE Cogn Sci; 2023 Jan; 47(1):e13240. PubMed ID: 36680423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. When intuitive Bayesians need to be good readers: The problem-wording effect on Bayesian reasoning. Sirota M; Navarrete G; Juanchich M Cognition; 2024 Apr; 245():105722. PubMed ID: 38309041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. When does information about causal structure improve statistical reasoning? McNair S; Feeney A Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):625-45. PubMed ID: 23931633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Natural frequency trees improve diagnostic efficiency in Bayesian reasoning. Binder K; Krauss S; Schmidmaier R; Braun LT Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2021 Aug; 26(3):847-863. PubMed ID: 33599875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Another chance for good reasoning. Pighin S; Tentori K; Girotto V Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1995-2002. PubMed ID: 28265865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Background beliefs in Bayesian inference. Evans JS; Handley SJ; Over DE; Perham N Mem Cognit; 2002 Mar; 30(2):179-90. PubMed ID: 12035880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. People Like Logical Truth: Testing the Intuitive Detection of Logical Value in Basic Propositions. Nakamura H; Kawaguchi J PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0169166. PubMed ID: 28036402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Deductive updating is not Bayesian. Markovits H; Brisson J; de Chantal PL J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(4):949-56. PubMed ID: 25603167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interactivity fosters Bayesian reasoning without instruction. Vallée-Tourangeau G; Abadie M; Vallée-Tourangeau F J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Jun; 144(3):581-603. PubMed ID: 26030173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the determinants of the conjunction fallacy: probability versus inductive confirmation. Tentori K; Crupi V; Russo S J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Feb; 142(1):235-255. PubMed ID: 22823498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]