These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

664 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27604516)

  • 1. From Wet-Lab to Variations: Concordance and Speed of Bioinformatics Pipelines for Whole Genome and Whole Exome Sequencing.
    Laurie S; Fernandez-Callejo M; Marco-Sola S; Trotta JR; Camps J; Chacón A; Espinosa A; Gut M; Gut I; Heath S; Beltran S
    Hum Mutat; 2016 Dec; 37(12):1263-1271. PubMed ID: 27604516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of post-alignment processing in variant discovery from whole exome data.
    Tian S; Yan H; Kalmbach M; Slager SL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):403. PubMed ID: 27716037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic benchmark of state-of-the-art variant calling pipelines identifies major factors affecting accuracy of coding sequence variant discovery.
    Barbitoff YA; Abasov R; Tvorogova VE; Glotov AS; Predeus AV
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Feb; 23(1):155. PubMed ID: 35193511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Systematic comparison of variant calling pipelines using gold standard personal exome variants.
    Hwang S; Kim E; Lee I; Marcotte EM
    Sci Rep; 2015 Dec; 5():17875. PubMed ID: 26639839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variant callers for next-generation sequencing data: a comparison study.
    Liu X; Han S; Wang Z; Gelernter J; Yang BZ
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e75619. PubMed ID: 24086590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. VariantMetaCaller: automated fusion of variant calling pipelines for quantitative, precision-based filtering.
    Gézsi A; Bolgár B; Marx P; Sarkozy P; Szalai C; Antal P
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Oct; 16():875. PubMed ID: 26510841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimized detection of insertions/deletions (INDELs) in whole-exome sequencing data.
    Kim BY; Park JH; Jo HY; Koo SK; Park MH
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182272. PubMed ID: 28792971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance assessment of variant calling pipelines using human whole exome sequencing and simulated data.
    Kumaran M; Subramanian U; Devarajan B
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Jun; 20(1):342. PubMed ID: 31208315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An analytical workflow for accurate variant discovery in highly divergent regions.
    Tian S; Yan H; Neuhauser C; Slager SL
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Sep; 17(1):703. PubMed ID: 27590916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medical implications of technical accuracy in genome sequencing.
    Goldfeder RL; Priest JR; Zook JM; Grove ME; Waggott D; Wheeler MT; Salit M; Ashley EA
    Genome Med; 2016 Mar; 8(1):24. PubMed ID: 26932475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Nine Somatic Variant Callers for Detection of Somatic Mutations in Exome and Targeted Deep Sequencing Data.
    Krøigård AB; Thomassen M; Lænkholm AV; Kruse TA; Larsen MJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151664. PubMed ID: 27002637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CoVaCS: a consensus variant calling system.
    Chiara M; Gioiosa S; Chillemi G; D'Antonio M; Flati T; Picardi E; Zambelli F; Horner DS; Pesole G; Castrignanò T
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Feb; 19(1):120. PubMed ID: 29402227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Challenges in exome analysis by LifeScope and its alternative computational pipelines.
    Pranckevičiene E; Rančelis T; Pranculis A; Kučinskas V
    BMC Res Notes; 2015 Sep; 8():421. PubMed ID: 26346699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Comparison of Variant Calling Pipelines Using Genome in a Bottle as a Reference.
    Cornish A; Guda C
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():456479. PubMed ID: 26539496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of somatic mutation calling methods in amplicon and whole exome sequence data.
    Xu H; DiCarlo J; Satya RV; Peng Q; Wang Y
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Mar; 15():244. PubMed ID: 24678773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic comparison of germline variant calling pipelines cross multiple next-generation sequencers.
    Chen J; Li X; Zhong H; Meng Y; Du H
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jun; 9(1):9345. PubMed ID: 31249349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detailed simulation of cancer exome sequencing data reveals differences and common limitations of variant callers.
    Hofmann AL; Behr J; Singer J; Kuipers J; Beisel C; Schraml P; Moch H; Beerenwinkel N
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):8. PubMed ID: 28049408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intersect-then-combine approach: improving the performance of somatic variant calling in whole exome sequencing data using multiple aligners and callers.
    Callari M; Sammut SJ; De Mattos-Arruda L; Bruna A; Rueda OM; Chin SF; Caldas C
    Genome Med; 2017 Apr; 9(1):35. PubMed ID: 28420412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. INDELseek: detection of complex insertions and deletions from next-generation sequencing data.
    Au CH; Leung AY; Kwong A; Chan TL; Ma ES
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):16. PubMed ID: 28056804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance evaluation of pipelines for mapping, variant calling and interval padding, for the analysis of NGS germline panels.
    Zanti M; Michailidou K; Loizidou MA; Machattou C; Pirpa P; Christodoulou K; Spyrou GM; Kyriacou K; Hadjisavvas A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Apr; 22(1):218. PubMed ID: 33910496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.