48 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27604602)
1. Maximizing noise energy for noise-masking studies.
Jules Étienne C; Arleo A; Allard R
Behav Res Methods; 2017 Aug; 49(4):1278-1290. PubMed ID: 27604602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of luminance noise on the object frequencies mediating letter identification.
Hall C; Wang S; Bhagat R; McAnany JJ
Front Psychol; 2014; 5():663. PubMed ID: 25071637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterizing the spatial-frequency sensitivity of perceptual templates.
Lu ZL; Dosher BA
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2001 Sep; 18(9):2041-53. PubMed ID: 11551035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Zero-dimensional noise: the best mask you never saw.
Baker DH; Meese TS
J Vis; 2012 Sep; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 23024357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Power spectrum model of visual masking: simulations and empirical data.
Serrano-Pedraza I; Sierra-Vázquez V; Derrington AM
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2013 Jun; 30(6):1119-35. PubMed ID: 24323099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Time course of dichoptic masking in normals and suppression in amblyopes.
Zhou J; McNeal S; Babu RJ; Baker DH; Bobier WR; Hess RF
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Apr; 55(7):4098-104. PubMed ID: 24744203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 2: improving test sensitivity for noise-induced hearing loss.
Leensen MC; de Laat JA; Snik AF; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):835-48. PubMed ID: 21970351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interactive effects of high-pass filtering and masking noise on word recognition.
Elangovan S; Stuart A
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2005 Nov; 114(11):867-78. PubMed ID: 16358607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do adaptive frequency response (AFR) hearing aids reduce 'upward spread' of masking?
Fabry DA; Leek MR; Walden BE; Cord M
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 8126656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.
Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2336-47. PubMed ID: 19354408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech Intelligibility for Target and Masker with Different Spectra.
Leclère T; Théry D; Lavandier M; Culling JF
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():257-266. PubMed ID: 27080666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A statistical perspective to visual masking.
Agaoglu S; Agaoglu MN; Breitmeyer B; Ogmen H
Vision Res; 2015 Oct; 115(Pt A):23-39. PubMed ID: 26238247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Auditory masking of a 10 kHz tone with environmental, comodulated, and Gaussian noise in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus).
Trickey JS; Branstetter BK; Finneran JJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3799-804. PubMed ID: 21218911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acoustic stapedius reflex function in man revisited.
Aiken SJ; Andrus JN; Bance M; Phillips DP
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):e38-51. PubMed ID: 23403808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Classification images for simple detection and discrimination tasks in correlated noise.
Abbey CK; Eckstein MP
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2007 Dec; 24(12):B110-24. PubMed ID: 18059903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perception of temporally filtered X-ray fluoroscopy images.
Wilson DL; Jabri KN; Aufrichtig R
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Jan; 18(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 10193694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spatial attention excludes external noise without changing the spatial frequency tuning of the perceptual template.
Lu ZL; Dosher BA
J Vis; 2004 Nov; 4(10):955-66. PubMed ID: 15595898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry determinations by modifying noise frequency spectrum between two consecutive wavelet-based low-pass filtering procedures.
Chen HP; Liao HJ; Huang CM; Wang SC; Yu SN
J Chromatogr A; 2010 Apr; 1217(17):2804-11. PubMed ID: 20227706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speech production modifications produced in the presence of low-pass and high-pass filtered noise.
Lu Y; Cooke M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1495-9. PubMed ID: 19739762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
