These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27604778)

  • 1. Preferred Compression Speed for Speech and Music and Its Relationship to Sensitivity to Temporal Fine Structure.
    Moore BC; Sęk A
    Trends Hear; 2016 Sep; 20():. PubMed ID: 27604778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determination of preferred parameters for multichannel compression using individually fitted simulated hearing AIDS and paired comparisons.
    Moore BC; Füllgrabe C; Stone MA
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):556-68. PubMed ID: 21285878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perception of Hearing Aid-Processed Speech in Individuals with Late-Onset Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder.
    Mathai JP; Appu S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015; 26(10):815-23. PubMed ID: 26554487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods.
    Moore BC; Sęk A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 22878351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the CAM2A and NAL-NL2 hearing-aid fitting methods for participants with a wide range of hearing losses.
    Moore BC; Sęk A
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 26470732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Music preferences with hearing aids: effects of signal properties, compression settings, and listener characteristics.
    Croghan NB; Arehart KH; Kates JM
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(5):e170-84. PubMed ID: 25010635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceived Sound Quality Dimensions Influencing Frequency-Gain Shaping Preferences for Hearing Aid-Amplified Speech and Music.
    Vaisberg JM; Beaulac S; Glista D; Macpherson EA; Scollie SD
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():2331216521989900. PubMed ID: 33563136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of compression speed on intelligibility: simulated hearing-aid processing with and without original temporal fine structure information.
    Hopkins K; King A; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1592-601. PubMed ID: 22978888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of bandwidth, compression speed, and gain at high frequencies on preferences for amplified music.
    Moore BC
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Sep; 16(3):159-72. PubMed ID: 23172008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of multi-channel compression time constants on subjectively perceived sound quality and speech intelligibility.
    Hansen M
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):369-80. PubMed ID: 12195179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Paired comparisons of nonlinear frequency compression, extended bandwidth, and restricted bandwidth hearing aid processing for children and adults with hearing loss.
    Brennan MA; McCreery R; Kopun J; Hoover B; Alexander J; Lewis D; Stelmachowicz PG
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014; 25(10):983-98. PubMed ID: 25514451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Musician and Nonmusician Hearing Aid Setting Preferences for Music and Speech Stimuli.
    D'Onofrio KL; Gifford RH; Ricketts TA
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Jun; 28(2):333-347. PubMed ID: 31091118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An initial-fit comparison of two generic hearing aid prescriptive methods (NAL-NL2 and CAM2) to individuals having mild to moderately severe high-frequency hearing loss.
    Johnson EE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 23357807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of Modified Hearing Aid Fittings on Loudness and Tone Quality for Different Acoustic Scenes.
    Moore BC; Baer T; Ives DT; Marriage J; Salorio-Corbetto M
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):483-91. PubMed ID: 26928003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of the number of amplitude-compression channels and compression speed on speech recognition by listeners with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss.
    Salorio-Corbetto M; Baer T; Stone MA; Moore BCJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Mar; 147(3):1344. PubMed ID: 32237835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Summers V; Makashay MJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):274-92. PubMed ID: 23636209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of different forms of compression using wearable digital hearing aids.
    Stone MA; Moore BC; Alcántara JI; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Dec; 106(6):3603-19. PubMed ID: 10615700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nonlinear frequency compression: effects on sound quality ratings of speech and music.
    Parsa V; Scollie S; Glista D; Seelisch A
    Trends Amplif; 2013 Mar; 17(1):54-68. PubMed ID: 23539261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sound Quality Ratings of Amplified Speech and Music Using a Direct Drive Hearing Aid: Effects of Bandwidth.
    Vaisberg J; Folkeard P; Levy S; Dundas D; Agrawal S; Scollie S
    Otol Neurotol; 2021 Feb; 42(2):227-234. PubMed ID: 32976346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of Hearing Loss and Fast-Acting Compression on Amplitude Modulation Perception and Speech Intelligibility.
    Wiinberg A; Jepsen ML; Epp B; Dau T
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 29668566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.