210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27604779)
1. The Influence of Cochlear Mechanical Dysfunction, Temporal Processing Deficits, and Age on the Intelligibility of Audible Speech in Noise for Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
Johannesen PT; Pérez-González P; Kalluri S; Blanco JL; Lopez-Poveda EA
Trends Hear; 2016 Sep; 20():. PubMed ID: 27604779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
Bernstein JG; Summers V; Grassi E; Grant KW
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity as a predictor of speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners.
Bernstein JG; Mehraei G; Shamma S; Gallun FJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):293-306. PubMed ID: 23636210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
Summers V; Makashay MJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):274-92. PubMed ID: 23636209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of lifetime noise exposure on the middle-age human auditory brainstem response, tinnitus and speech-in-noise intelligibility.
Valderrama JT; Beach EF; Yeend I; Sharma M; Van Dun B; Dillon H
Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():36-48. PubMed ID: 29913342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Speech perception in tones and noise via cochlear implants reveals influence of spectral resolution on temporal processing.
Oxenham AJ; Kreft HA
Trends Hear; 2014 Oct; 18():. PubMed ID: 25315376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Abnormal intelligibility of speech in competing speech and in noise in a frequency region where audiometric thresholds are near-normal for hearing-impaired listeners.
Léger AC; Ives DT; Lorenzi C
Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():102-9. PubMed ID: 25124152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
Grant KW; Walden TC
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Bernstein JG; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing.
Zamaninezhad L; Hohmann V; Büchner A; Schädler MR; Jürgens T
Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of masker type on early reflection processing and speech intelligibility (L).
Arweiler I; Buchholz JM; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 23297878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech Understanding With Various Maskers in Cochlear-Implant and Simulated Cochlear-Implant Hearing: Effects of Spectral Resolution and Implications for Masking Release.
Croghan NBH; Smith ZM
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518787276. PubMed ID: 30022730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Behavioral measures of cochlear compression and temporal resolution as predictors of speech masking release in hearing-impaired listeners.
Gregan MJ; Nelson PB; Oxenham AJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2895-912. PubMed ID: 24116426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of Hearing Loss and Fast-Acting Compression on Amplitude Modulation Perception and Speech Intelligibility.
Wiinberg A; Jepsen ML; Epp B; Dau T
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 29668566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictors of Susceptibility to Noise and Speech Masking Among School-Age Children With Hearing Loss or Typical Hearing.
Lalonde K; Walker EA; Leibold LJ; McCreery RW
Ear Hear; 2024 Jan-Feb 01; 45(1):81-93. PubMed ID: 37415268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictors of Hearing-Aid Outcomes.
Lopez-Poveda EA; Johannesen PT; Pérez-González P; Blanco JL; Kalluri S; Edwards B
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517730526. PubMed ID: 28929903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Masked speech perception across the adult lifespan: Impact of age and hearing impairment.
Goossens T; Vercammen C; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():109-124. PubMed ID: 27845259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
