These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27604952)

  • 21. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Confidence intervals of effect size for paired studies.
    Wu J; Jiang G
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):765-73. PubMed ID: 17634978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Frequentist performance of Bayesian confidence intervals for comparing proportions in 2 x 2 contingency tables.
    Agresti A; Min Y
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):515-23. PubMed ID: 16011699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accurate interval estimation for the risk difference in an incomplete correlated 2 × 2 table: Calf immunity analysis.
    Lu H; Cai F; Li Y; Ou X
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0272007. PubMed ID: 35867721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Study specific prediction intervals for random-effects meta-analysis: A tutorial: Prediction intervals in meta-analysis.
    van Aert RCM; Schmid CH; Svensson D; Jackson D
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Jul; 12(4):429-447. PubMed ID: 33939307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Empirical Bayes interval estimates that are conditionally equal to unadjusted confidence intervals or to default prior credibility intervals.
    Bickel DR
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Feb; 11(3):Article 7. PubMed ID: 22499708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Modelling heterogeneity variances in multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis--are informative priors the better solution?
    Thorlund K; Thabane L; Mills EJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jan; 13():2. PubMed ID: 23311298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prediction intervals for random-effects meta-analysis: A confidence distribution approach.
    Nagashima K; Noma H; Furukawa TA
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jun; 28(6):1689-1702. PubMed ID: 29745296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Combining one-sample confidence procedures for inference in the two-sample case.
    Fay MP; Proschan MA; Brittain E
    Biometrics; 2015 Mar; 71(1):146-156. PubMed ID: 25274182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of four gamma-based methods for calculating confidence intervals for age-adjusted mortality rates when data are sparse.
    Talih M; Anderson RN; Parker JD
    Popul Health Metr; 2022 May; 20(1):13. PubMed ID: 35525928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Confidence intervals for the overall effect size in random-effects meta-analysis.
    Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Mar; 13(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 18331152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessing the amount of heterogeneity in random-effects meta-analysis.
    Knapp G; Biggerstaff BJ; Hartung J
    Biom J; 2006 Apr; 48(2):271-85. PubMed ID: 16708778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Multiple imputation confidence intervals for the mean of the discrete distributions for incomplete data.
    Lee CH; Wang H
    Stat Med; 2022 Mar; 41(7):1172-1190. PubMed ID: 34786744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A bootstrap approach for assessing the uncertainty of outcome probabilities when using a scoring system.
    Cevenini G; Barbini P
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2010 Aug; 10():45. PubMed ID: 20796275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Meta-analysis of two studies in the presence of heterogeneity with applications in rare diseases.
    Friede T; Röver C; Wandel S; Neuenschwander B
    Biom J; 2017 Jul; 59(4):658-671. PubMed ID: 27754556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impact of analysing continuous outcomes using final values, change scores and analysis of covariance on the performance of meta-analytic methods: a simulation study.
    McKenzie JE; Herbison GP; Deeks JJ
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Dec; 7(4):371-386. PubMed ID: 26715122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Test-compatible confidence intervals for adaptive two-stage single-arm designs with binary endpoint.
    Kunzmann K; Kieser M
    Biom J; 2018 Jan; 60(1):196-206. PubMed ID: 29076185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Robust meta-analytic conclusions mandate the provision of prediction intervals in meta-analysis summaries.
    Graham PL; Moran JL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 May; 65(5):503-10. PubMed ID: 22265586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Methods for estimating between-study variance and overall effect in meta-analysis of odds ratios.
    Bakbergenuly I; Hoaglin DC; Kulinskaya E
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 May; 11(3):426-442. PubMed ID: 32112619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A framework for the meta-analysis of Bland-Altman studies based on a limits of agreement approach.
    Tipton E; Shuster J
    Stat Med; 2017 Oct; 36(23):3621-3635. PubMed ID: 28664537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.