These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27604952)

  • 41. Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman approach and its modification for random-effects meta-analysis with few studies.
    Röver C; Knapp G; Friede T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Nov; 15():99. PubMed ID: 26573817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Confidence intervals for a random-effects meta-analysis based on Bartlett-type corrections.
    Noma H
    Stat Med; 2011 Dec; 30(28):3304-12. PubMed ID: 21964669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Meta-analysis of few small studies in orphan diseases.
    Friede T; Röver C; Wandel S; Neuenschwander B
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Mar; 8(1):79-91. PubMed ID: 27362487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparative performance of heterogeneity variance estimators in meta-analysis: a review of simulation studies.
    Langan D; Higgins JPT; Simmonds M
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Jun; 8(2):181-198. PubMed ID: 27060925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Intervals for posttest probabilities: a comparison of 5 methods.
    Mossman D; Berger JO
    Med Decis Making; 2001; 21(6):498-507. PubMed ID: 11760107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The heterogeneity statistic I(2) can be biased in small meta-analyses.
    von Hippel PT
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Apr; 15():35. PubMed ID: 25880989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Shortcomings of an approximate confidence interval for moment-based estimators of the between-study variance in random-effects meta-analysis.
    Hoaglin DC
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Dec; 7(4):459-461. PubMed ID: 27231158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Simultaneous confidence intervals for a success probability and intraclass correlation, with an application to screening mammography.
    Kim J; Lee JH
    Biom J; 2013 Nov; 55(6):944-54. PubMed ID: 24115052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Selecting the best meta-analytic estimator for evidence-based practice: a simulation study.
    Doi SAR; Furuya-Kanamori L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2020 Mar; 18(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 31764215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Improved exact confidence intervals for the odds ratio in two independent binomial samples.
    Lin CY; Yang MC
    Biom J; 2006 Dec; 48(6):1008-19. PubMed ID: 17240658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A simple method to estimate prediction intervals and predictive distributions: Summarizing meta-analyses beyond means and confidence intervals.
    Wang CC; Lee WC
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):255-266. PubMed ID: 30835918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A confidence interval robust to publication bias for random-effects meta-analysis of few studies.
    Henmi M; Hattori S; Friede T
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Sep; 12(5):674-679. PubMed ID: 33576574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Quantifying uncertainty in the meta-analytic lower bound estimate.
    Brannick MT; Potter S; Teng Y
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Dec; 24(6):754-773. PubMed ID: 31094545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Meta-analysis of studies with missing data.
    Yuan Y; Little RJ
    Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):487-96. PubMed ID: 18565168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity in the meta-analysis of RCTs using standard and generalised Q statistics.
    Bowden J; Tierney JF; Copas AJ; Burdett S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Apr; 11():41. PubMed ID: 21473747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Inferences about the between-study variance in meta-analysis with normally distributed outcomes.
    Tian L
    Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):248-56. PubMed ID: 18383448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Analysis of Covariance in Randomized Experiments with Heterogeneity of Regression and a Random Covariate: The Variance of the Estimated Treatment Effect at Selected Covariate Values.
    Li L; McLouth CJ; Delaney HD
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(6):926-940. PubMed ID: 31795755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Duval S; Tweedie R
    Biometrics; 2000 Jun; 56(2):455-63. PubMed ID: 10877304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A comparison of statistical methods for combining relative bioactivities from parallel line bioassays.
    Mzolo T; Hendriks M; van den Heuvel E
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(6):375-84. PubMed ID: 24123711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.