These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

782 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27605105)

  • 1. ReliableGenome: annotation of genomic regions with high/low variant calling concordance.
    Popitsch N; ; Schuh A; Taylor JC
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 33(2):155-160. PubMed ID: 27605105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CoVaCS: a consensus variant calling system.
    Chiara M; Gioiosa S; Chillemi G; D'Antonio M; Flati T; Picardi E; Zambelli F; Horner DS; Pesole G; Castrignanò T
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Feb; 19(1):120. PubMed ID: 29402227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using genotype array data to compare multi- and single-sample variant calls and improve variant call sets from deep coverage whole-genome sequencing data.
    Shringarpure SS; Mathias RA; Hernandez RD; O'Connor TD; Szpiech ZA; Torres R; De La Vega FM; Bustamante CD; Barnes KC; Taub MA;
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Apr; 33(8):1147-1153. PubMed ID: 28035032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. VariantMetaCaller: automated fusion of variant calling pipelines for quantitative, precision-based filtering.
    Gézsi A; Bolgár B; Marx P; Sarkozy P; Szalai C; Antal P
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Oct; 16():875. PubMed ID: 26510841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Toward better understanding of artifacts in variant calling from high-coverage samples.
    Li H
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Oct; 30(20):2843-51. PubMed ID: 24974202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Empirical evaluation of variant calling accuracy using ultra-deep whole-genome sequencing data.
    Kishikawa T; Momozawa Y; Ozeki T; Mushiroda T; Inohara H; Kamatani Y; Kubo M; Okada Y
    Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):1784. PubMed ID: 30741997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Challenges in exome analysis by LifeScope and its alternative computational pipelines.
    Pranckevičiene E; Rančelis T; Pranculis A; Kučinskas V
    BMC Res Notes; 2015 Sep; 8():421. PubMed ID: 26346699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identification of indels in next-generation sequencing data.
    Ratan A; Olson TL; Loughran TP; Miller W
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 16(1):42. PubMed ID: 25879703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of genetic variants in matched samples using thesaurus annotation.
    Konopka T; Nijman SM
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Mar; 32(5):657-63. PubMed ID: 26545822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative analysis of whole-genome sequencing pipelines to minimize false negative findings.
    Hwang KB; Lee IH; Li H; Won DG; Hernandez-Ferrer C; Negron JA; Kong SW
    Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):3219. PubMed ID: 30824715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Leveraging known genomic variants to improve detection of variants, especially close-by Indels.
    Vo NS; Phan V
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Sep; 34(17):2918-2926. PubMed ID: 29590294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SMaSH: a benchmarking toolkit for human genome variant calling.
    Talwalkar A; Liptrap J; Newcomb J; Hartl C; Terhorst J; Curtis K; Bresler M; Song YS; Jordan MI; Patterson D
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Oct; 30(19):2787-95. PubMed ID: 24894505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Integrating human sequence data sets provides a resource of benchmark SNP and indel genotype calls.
    Zook JM; Chapman B; Wang J; Mittelman D; Hofmann O; Hide W; Salit M
    Nat Biotechnol; 2014 Mar; 32(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 24531798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. FermiKit: assembly-based variant calling for Illumina resequencing data.
    Li H
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Nov; 31(22):3694-6. PubMed ID: 26220959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A reference data set of 5.4 million phased human variants validated by genetic inheritance from sequencing a three-generation 17-member pedigree.
    Eberle MA; Fritzilas E; Krusche P; Källberg M; Moore BL; Bekritsky MA; Iqbal Z; Chuang HY; Humphray SJ; Halpern AL; Kruglyak S; Margulies EH; McVean G; Bentley DR
    Genome Res; 2017 Jan; 27(1):157-164. PubMed ID: 27903644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic comparison of germline variant calling pipelines cross multiple next-generation sequencers.
    Chen J; Li X; Zhong H; Meng Y; Du H
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jun; 9(1):9345. PubMed ID: 31249349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Consensus Genotyper for Exome Sequencing (CGES): improving the quality of exome variant genotypes.
    Trubetskoy V; Rodriguez A; Dave U; Campbell N; Crawford EL; Cook EH; Sutcliffe JS; Foster I; Madduri R; Cox NJ; Davis LK
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Jan; 31(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 25270638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. RAPTR-SV: a hybrid method for the detection of structural variants.
    Bickhart DM; Hutchison JL; Xu L; Schnabel RD; Taylor JF; Reecy JM; Schroeder S; Van Tassell CP; Sonstegard TS; Liu GE
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Jul; 31(13):2084-90. PubMed ID: 25686638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. FastGT: an alignment-free method for calling common SNVs directly from raw sequencing reads.
    Pajuste FD; Kaplinski L; Möls M; Puurand T; Lepamets M; Remm M
    Sci Rep; 2017 May; 7(1):2537. PubMed ID: 28566690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Best practices for benchmarking germline small-variant calls in human genomes.
    Krusche P; Trigg L; Boutros PC; Mason CE; De La Vega FM; Moore BL; Gonzalez-Porta M; Eberle MA; Tezak Z; Lababidi S; Truty R; Asimenos G; Funke B; Fleharty M; Chapman BA; Salit M; Zook JM;
    Nat Biotechnol; 2019 May; 37(5):555-560. PubMed ID: 30858580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 40.