These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27605425)

  • 1. Grey matters; on the importance of publication bias in systematic reviews.
    Winters M; Weir A
    Br J Sports Med; 2017 Mar; 51(6):488-489. PubMed ID: 27605425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: systematic review is needed.
    Forbes RB; McCarron M
    BMJ; 2005 Sep; 331(7517):638. PubMed ID: 16166147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Publication Bias and Nonreporting Found in Majority of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Anesthesiology Journals.
    Hedin RJ; Umberham BA; Detweiler BN; Kollmorgen L; Vassar M
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Oct; 123(4):1018-25. PubMed ID: 27537925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Best practice in systematic reviews: the importance of protocols and registration.
    PLoS Medicine Editors
    PLoS Med; 2011 Feb; 8(2):e1001009. PubMed ID: 21364968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Should journals publish systematic reviews that find no evidence to guide practice? Examples from injury research.
    Alderson P; Roberts I
    BMJ; 2000 Feb; 320(7231):376-7. PubMed ID: 10657341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recognising letters in systematic reviews.
    Burden AC
    Lancet; 2000 Jun; 355(9221):2170. PubMed ID: 10902662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reviews, systematic reviews and Anaesthesia.
    Smith AF; Carlisle J
    Anaesthesia; 2015 Jun; 70(6):644-50. PubMed ID: 25959174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reprint--preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
    Moher D; Liberati A; Tetzlaff J; Altman DG;
    Phys Ther; 2009 Sep; 89(9):873-80. PubMed ID: 19723669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits.
    Mahood Q; Van Eerd D; Irvin E
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Sep; 5(3):221-34. PubMed ID: 26052848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Uptake of methods to deal with publication bias in systematic reviews has increased over time, but there is still much scope for improvement.
    Parekh-Bhurke S; Kwok CS; Pang C; Hooper L; Loke YK; Ryder JJ; Sutton AJ; Hing CB; Harvey I; Song F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 64(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 20800992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Publication bias in dermatology systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Atakpo P; Vassar M
    J Dermatol Sci; 2016 May; 82(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 26925817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Irony and the Elephant in the Review.
    Grocott HP; Deutscher R
    Anesth Analg; 2017 May; 124(5):1736-1737. PubMed ID: 28319518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic reviews of surgical interventions.
    Burton M; Clarke M
    Surg Clin North Am; 2006 Feb; 86(1):101-14, ix. PubMed ID: 16442423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Instructions for aggregated evidence: About reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses (part 2)].
    Günther J; Briel M; Schindler B
    Med Monatsschr Pharm; 2015 Oct; 38(10):401-8. PubMed ID: 26731858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In the land of double-blind studies the case report is king.
    Levi M
    Neth J Med; 2013 Dec; 71(10):500-1. PubMed ID: 24394733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Research synthesis in veterinary science: Narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
    O'Connor A; Sargeant J
    Vet J; 2015 Dec; 206(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 26522692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [About review articles].
    Haug C
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2011 Jun; 131(12):1179. PubMed ID: 21694739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Systematic review of publication bias in studies on publication bias.
    Dubben HH; Beck-Bornholdt HP
    BMJ; 2005 Aug; 331(7514):433-4. PubMed ID: 15937056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Finding studies for inclusion in systematic reviews of interventions for injury prevention the importance of grey and unpublished literature.
    Blackhall K
    Inj Prev; 2007 Oct; 13(5):359. PubMed ID: 17916897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trusting systematic reviews and meta-analyses: all that glitters is not gold!
    Weir A; Rabia S; Ardern C
    Br J Sports Med; 2016 Sep; 50(18):1100-1. PubMed ID: 26968215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.