These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27605425)

  • 21. Search strategies in systematic reviews in periodontology and implant dentistry.
    Faggion CM; Atieh MA; Park S
    J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Sep; 40(9):883-8. PubMed ID: 23834263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Critical appraisal for emergency medicine: 6 systematic reviews.
    Goodacre S
    Emerg Med J; 2009 Feb; 26(2):114-6. PubMed ID: 19164622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Association of study quality with completeness of reporting.
    McInnes M; Tunis AS
    Radiology; 2014 Jul; 272(1):303-4. PubMed ID: 24956054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The increasing importance of systematic reviews in clinical dermatology research and publication.
    Freeman SR; Williams HC; Dellavalle RP
    J Invest Dermatol; 2006 Nov; 126(11):2357-60. PubMed ID: 17041612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: studies on publication bias are probably susceptible to the bias they study.
    Song F
    BMJ; 2005 Sep; 331(7517):637-8. PubMed ID: 16166143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Systematic reviews of meta-analyses: applications and limitations.
    Delgado-Rodríguez M
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2006 Feb; 60(2):90-2. PubMed ID: 16415253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Review of the literature, information search and critical reading in the field of oncology].
    Bonichon F; Courtial F
    Bull Cancer; 1995 Oct; 82(10):768-79. PubMed ID: 8535005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on psoriasis: role of funding sources, conflict of interest and bibliometric indices as predictors of methodological quality.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Gay-Mimbrera J; Maestre-Lopez B; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Carmona-Fernández PJ; González-Padilla M; Vélez García-Nieto A; Isla-Tejera B
    Br J Dermatol; 2017 Jun; 176(6):1633-1644. PubMed ID: 28192600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Leucht S; Kissling W; Davis JM
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Jun; 119(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 19469725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Moose on the loose: checklist for meta-analyses of observational studies.
    van Zuuren EJ; Fedorowicz Z
    Br J Dermatol; 2016 Nov; 175(5):853-854. PubMed ID: 27790686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Workshop 11-sources of bias in studies of systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis.
    Yu IT; Tse SL
    Hong Kong Med J; 2013 Apr; 19(2):156-8. PubMed ID: 23535676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Tutorial for writing systematic reviews for the Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy (BJPT).
    Mancini MC; Cardoso JR; Sampaio RF; Costa LC; Cabral CM; Costa LO
    Braz J Phys Ther; 2014; 18(6):471-80. PubMed ID: 25590440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Capture-recapture is a potentially useful method for assessing publication bias.
    Bennett DA; Latham NK; Stretton C; Anderson CS
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Apr; 57(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 15135835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on influenza vaccination.
    Remschmidt C; Wichmann O; Harder T
    Vaccine; 2014 Mar; 32(15):1678-84. PubMed ID: 24513008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: here's a proposal for editors that may help reduce publication bias.
    Glymour MM; Kawachi I
    BMJ; 2005 Sep; 331(7517):638. PubMed ID: 16166149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [The importance of publication bias in medical-scientific literature].
    de Melker HE; Rosendaal FR; Vandenbroucke JP
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Oct; 137(42):2126-30. PubMed ID: 8232658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. From the five blind men to Cochrane Complementary Medicine systematic reviews.
    Ezzo J
    J Altern Complement Med; 2003 Dec; 9(6):969-72. PubMed ID: 14736367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Systematic reviews, an update].
    Scholten RJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009 May; 153(18):866-9. PubMed ID: 19475866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: mandatory publication of data may help.
    Mann J
    BMJ; 2005 Sep; 331(7517):638. PubMed ID: 16166148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: meta-research on publication bias does not help transfer research results to patient care.
    Kranke P
    BMJ; 2005 Sep; 331(7517):638. PubMed ID: 16166150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.