These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

407 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27607544)

  • 1. Multiple imputation of missing data in multilevel designs: A comparison of different strategies.
    Lüdtke O; Robitzsch A; Grund S
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Mar; 22(1):141-165. PubMed ID: 27607544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multilevel multiple imputation: A review and evaluation of joint modeling and chained equations imputation.
    Enders CK; Mistler SA; Keller BT
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Jun; 21(2):222-40. PubMed ID: 26690775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of approaches for multiple imputation of three-level data.
    Wijesuriya R; Moreno-Betancur M; Carlin JB; Lee KJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Aug; 20(1):207. PubMed ID: 32787781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biases in multilevel analyses caused by cluster-specific fixed-effects imputation.
    Speidel M; Drechsler J; Sakshaug JW
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Oct; 50(5):1824-1840. PubMed ID: 28840562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Imputation strategies when a continuous outcome is to be dichotomized for responder analysis: a simulation study.
    Floden L; Bell ML
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):161. PubMed ID: 31345166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A model-based imputation procedure for multilevel regression models with random coefficients, interaction effects, and nonlinear terms.
    Enders CK; Du H; Keller BT
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Feb; 25(1):88-112. PubMed ID: 31259566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiple imputation for handling missing outcome data when estimating the relative risk.
    Sullivan TR; Lee KJ; Ryan P; Salter AB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):134. PubMed ID: 28877666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Explicating the Conditions Under Which Multilevel Multiple Imputation Mitigates Bias Resulting from Random Coefficient-Dependent Missing Longitudinal Data.
    Gottfredson NC; Sterba SK; Jackson KM
    Prev Sci; 2017 Jan; 18(1):12-19. PubMed ID: 27866307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of multiple imputation methods for missing data in longitudinal studies.
    Huque MH; Carlin JB; Simpson JA; Lee KJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):168. PubMed ID: 30541455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Comparison of Multilevel Imputation Schemes for Random Coefficient Models: Fully Conditional Specification and Joint Model Imputation with Random Covariance Matrices.
    Enders CK; Hayes T; Du H
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(5):695-713. PubMed ID: 30693802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiple imputation methods for handling missing values in a longitudinal categorical variable with restrictions on transitions over time: a simulation study.
    De Silva AP; Moreno-Betancur M; De Livera AM; Lee KJ; Simpson JA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):14. PubMed ID: 30630434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Review and evaluation of imputation methods for multivariate longitudinal data with mixed-type incomplete variables.
    Cao Y; Allore H; Vander Wyk B; Gutman R
    Stat Med; 2022 Dec; 41(30):5844-5876. PubMed ID: 36220138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simple imputation methods versus direct likelihood analysis for missing item scores in multilevel educational data.
    Kadengye DT; Cools W; Ceulemans E; Van den Noortgate W
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Jun; 44(2):516-31. PubMed ID: 22002637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiple imputation for patient reported outcome measures in randomised controlled trials: advantages and disadvantages of imputing at the item, subscale or composite score level.
    Rombach I; Gray AM; Jenkinson C; Murray DW; Rivero-Arias O
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):87. PubMed ID: 30153796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of existing methods for multiple imputation in individual participant data meta-analysis.
    Kunkel D; Kaizar EE
    Stat Med; 2017 Sep; 36(22):3507-3532. PubMed ID: 28695667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A fully conditional specification approach to multilevel imputation of categorical and continuous variables.
    Enders CK; Keller BT; Levy R
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Jun; 23(2):298-317. PubMed ID: 28557466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Missing data in a multi-item instrument were best handled by multiple imputation at the item score level.
    Eekhout I; de Vet HC; Twisk JW; Brand JP; de Boer MR; Heymans MW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Mar; 67(3):335-42. PubMed ID: 24291505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of methods for imputing limited-range variables: a simulation study.
    Rodwell L; Lee KJ; Romaniuk H; Carlin JB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Apr; 14():57. PubMed ID: 24766825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiple imputation by predictive mean matching in cluster-randomized trials.
    Bailey BE; Andridge R; Shoben AB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):72. PubMed ID: 32228491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does pattern mixture modelling reduce bias due to informative attrition compared to fitting a mixed effects model to the available cases or data imputed using multiple imputation?: a simulation study.
    Welch CA; Sabia S; Brunner E; Kivimäki M; Shipley MJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):89. PubMed ID: 30157752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.