These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27609144)

  • 1. Functional hearing in the classroom: assistive listening devices for students with hearing impairment in a mainstream school setting.
    Zanin J; Rance G
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Dec; 55(12):723-729. PubMed ID: 27609144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
    Ricketts TA; Picou EM
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Translation and validation of the Listen Inventory for Education Revised into Dutch.
    Krijger S; De Raeve L; Anderson KL; Dhooge I
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Apr; 107():62-68. PubMed ID: 29501314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a Remote Microphone System with Tri-Microphone Beamformer.
    Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L; Battles J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 31429403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benefits in Speech Recognition in Noise with Remote Wireless Microphones in Group Settings.
    Thibodeau LM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jun; 31(6):404-411. PubMed ID: 31758679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Self-assessment of classroom assistive listening devices.
    Odelius J; Johansson O
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jul; 49(7):508-17. PubMed ID: 20524774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Considerations for Choosing Microphone Technologies for Students With Limited Useable Hearing Unilaterally.
    Picou EM; Davis H; Tharpe AM
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2020 Jan; 51(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 31913805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Technology skills assessment for deaf and hard of hearing students in secondary school.
    Luft P; Bonello M; Zirzow NK
    Am Ann Deaf; 2009; 154(4):389-99. PubMed ID: 20066921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the effectiveness of alternative listening devices to conventional hearing aids in adults with hearing loss.
    Maidment DW; Barker AB; Xia J; Ferguson MA
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Oct; 57(10):721-729. PubMed ID: 30388942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of Personal Frequency Modulation Systems on Behavioral and Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential Measures of Auditory Processing and Classroom Listening in School-Aged Children with Auditory Processing Disorder.
    Smart JL; Purdy SC; Kelly AS
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018; 29(7):568-586. PubMed ID: 29988006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recognition performance for four combinations of FM system and hearing aid microphone signals in adverse listening conditions.
    Pittman AL; Lewis DE; Hoover BM; Stelmachowicz PG
    Ear Hear; 1999 Aug; 20(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 10466564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Classroom listening assessment: strategies for speech-language pathologists.
    Johnson CD
    Semin Speech Lang; 2012 Nov; 33(4):322-39. PubMed ID: 23081792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of a low cost assistive listening system for hearing-impaired student classroom.
    Pan-ngum S; Soonrach T; Seesutas S; Noymai A; Israsena P
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2013; 2013():787656. PubMed ID: 23766709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech perception benefits of FM and infrared devices to children with hearing aids in a typical classroom.
    Anderson KL; Goldstein H
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2004 Apr; 35(2):169-84. PubMed ID: 15191328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Listening Difficulties of Children With Cochlear Implants in Mainstream Secondary Education.
    Krijger S; Coene M; Govaerts PJ; Dhooge I
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1172-1186. PubMed ID: 32032224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hearing Technology Use and Management in School-Age Children: Reports from Data Logs, Parents, and Teachers.
    Gustafson SJ; Ricketts TA; Tharpe AM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017; 28(10):883-892. PubMed ID: 29130436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the use of an assistive listening device for communication efficiency using the Diapix task: a pilot study.
    McInerney M; Walden P
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2013; 65(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 23711727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. .Signal Transparency of Remote Microphone Technology in Pediatric Bone Conduction Device Users.
    Sanchez C; Morgenstein K; Snapp H
    Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(5):360-370. PubMed ID: 37271142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assistive hearing technologies among students with hearing impairment: factors that promote satisfaction.
    Rekkedal AM
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2012; 17(4):499-517. PubMed ID: 22960754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.