152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27609549)
1. Adverse skin reactions following percutaneous bone conduction implant surgery using the linear incision technique with and without subcutaneous tissue reduction.
Van der Gucht K; Vanderveken O; Hamans E; Claes J; Van Rompaey V; Van de Heyning P
Acta Otolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 137(2):149-153. PubMed ID: 27609549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term results of 185 consecutive osseointegrated hearing device implantations: a comparison among children, adults, and elderly.
Calvo Bodnia N; Foghsgaard S; Nue Møller M; Cayé-Thomasen P
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Dec; 35(10):e301-6. PubMed ID: 25122598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Punch and Drill: Implantation of Bone Anchored Hearing Device Through a Minimal Skin Punch Incision Versus Implantation With Dermatome and Soft Tissue Reduction.
Dumon T; Medina M; Sperling NM
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2016 Mar; 125(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 26384503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: inside or outside the line of incision?
Strijbos RM; den Besten CA; Mylanus EA; Hol MK
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Nov; 273(11):3713-3722. PubMed ID: 27086360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bone-anchored Hearing Implant Surgery: Randomized Trial of Dermatome Versus Linear Incision Without Soft Tissue Reduction--Clinical Measures.
Høgsbro M; Agger A; Johansen LV
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jun; 36(5):805-11. PubMed ID: 25695686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of more than 1,000 implanted percutaneous bone conduction devices: skin reactions and implant survival.
Dun CA; Faber HT; de Wolf MJ; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW; Hol MK
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Feb; 33(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 22246385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Systematic Review on Complications of Tissue Preservation Surgical Techniques in Percutaneous Bone Conduction Hearing Devices.
Verheij E; Bezdjian A; Grolman W; Thomeer HG
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Aug; 37(7):829-37. PubMed ID: 27273402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Findings from the experience with the punch technique for auditory osseointegrated implants: A retrospective single center comparative study.
Bonilla A; Magri C; Juan E
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed); 2017; 68(6):309-316. PubMed ID: 28549683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery compared to the linear incision technique without soft tissue reduction for bone conduction hearing implants: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Calon TG; van Hoof M; van den Berge H; de Bruijn AJ; van Tongeren J; Hof JR; Brunings JW; Jonhede S; Anteunis LJ; Janssen M; Joore MA; Holmberg M; Johansson ML; Stokroos RJ
Trials; 2016 Nov; 17(1):540. PubMed ID: 27829464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: linear incision technique with tissue preservation versus linear incision technique with tissue reduction.
van der Stee EHH; Strijbos RM; Bom SJH; Hol MKS
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jul; 275(7):1737-1747. PubMed ID: 29846791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: dermatome versus linear incision technique.
Strijbos RM; Bom SJH; Zwerver S; Hol MKS
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jan; 274(1):109-117. PubMed ID: 27439945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Has the use of the linear incision reduced skin complications in bone-anchored hearing aid implantation?
Roplekar R; Lim A; Hussain SS
J Laryngol Otol; 2016 Jun; 130(6):541-4. PubMed ID: 27160014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Cleating Stitch: An Adjunctive Technique for Percutaneous and Revision Osseointegration Screws.
Fort MM; Scarbrough ME; McGrew BM
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Dec; 39(10):1285-1290. PubMed ID: 30252800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of skin complications between dermatome and U-graft technique in BAHA surgery].
Tamarit Conejeros JM; Dalmau Galofre J; Murcia Puchades V; Pons Rocher F; Fernández Martínez S; Estrems Navas P
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2009; 60(6):422-7. PubMed ID: 19909718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bone-anchored hearing aid implant location in relation to skin reactions.
Faber HT; de Wolf MJ; de Rooy JW; Hol MK; Cremers CW; Mylanus EA
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Aug; 135(8):742-7. PubMed ID: 19687391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implantation of Bone-Anchored Hearing Devices Through a Minimal Skin Punch Incision Versus the Epidermal Flap Technique.
Dumon T; Wegner I; Sperling N; Grolman W
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Jan; 38(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 27779562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-Year Clinical and Audiological Outcomes of Percutaneous Implants for Bone Conduction Devices: Comparison Between Tissue Preservation Technique and Tissue Reduction Technique.
Kruyt IJ; Kok H; Bosman A; Nelissen RC; Mylanus EAM; Hol MKS
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Mar; 40(3):335-343. PubMed ID: 30742596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-Term Outcomes of a Percutaneous Wide-Diameter Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant: A Clinical Evaluation of More than 800 Implants.
Teunissen EM; Caspers CJI; Vijverberg MA; Pennings RJE; Mylanus EAM; Hol MKS
Otol Neurotol; 2024 Jun; 45(5):e435-e442. PubMed ID: 38728559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The birmingham pediatric bone-anchored hearing aid program: a 15-year experience.
McDermott AL; Williams J; Kuo M; Reid A; Proops D
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Feb; 30(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 18957903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long term cutaneous complications related to bone conduction hearing implants. A retrospective study (2004-2018).
Hernández S; Ospina JC; Gutiérrez-Gómez E; Rodríguez-Ruiz MT; Escobar JL
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2021 Oct; 48(5):878-884. PubMed ID: 33531159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
