1024 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27609980)
1. Development of a generally applicable morphokinetic algorithm capable of predicting the implantation potential of embryos transferred on Day 3.
Petersen BM; Boel M; Montag M; Gardner DK
Hum Reprod; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2231-44. PubMed ID: 27609980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical validation of an automatic classification algorithm applied on cleavage stage embryos: analysis for blastulation, euploidy, implantation, and live-birth potential.
Valera MA; Aparicio-Ruiz B; Pérez-Albalá S; Romany L; Remohí J; Meseguer M
Hum Reprod; 2023 Jun; 38(6):1060-1075. PubMed ID: 37018626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation between aneuploidy, standard morphology evaluation and morphokinetic development in 1730 biopsied blastocysts: a consecutive case series study.
Minasi MG; Colasante A; Riccio T; Ruberti A; Casciani V; Scarselli F; Spinella F; Fiorentino F; Varricchio MT; Greco E
Hum Reprod; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2245-54. PubMed ID: 27591227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Deep learning as a predictive tool for fetal heart pregnancy following time-lapse incubation and blastocyst transfer.
Tran D; Cooke S; Illingworth PJ; Gardner DK
Hum Reprod; 2019 Jun; 34(6):1011-1018. PubMed ID: 31111884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Time-lapse deselection model for human day 3 in vitro fertilization embryos: the combination of qualitative and quantitative measures of embryo growth.
Liu Y; Chapple V; Feenan K; Roberts P; Matson P
Fertil Steril; 2016 Mar; 105(3):656-662.e1. PubMed ID: 26616439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can novel early non-invasive biomarkers of embryo quality be identified with time-lapse imaging to predict live birth?
Barberet J; Bruno C; Valot E; Antunes-Nunes C; Jonval L; Chammas J; Choux C; Ginod P; Sagot P; Soudry-Faure A; Fauque P
Hum Reprod; 2019 Aug; 34(8):1439-1449. PubMed ID: 31287145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Morphokinetic analysis and embryonic prediction for blastocyst formation through an integrated time-lapse system.
Motato Y; de los Santos MJ; Escriba MJ; Ruiz BA; Remohí J; Meseguer M
Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):376-84.e9. PubMed ID: 26598211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro maturation is associated with increased early embryo arrest without impairing morphokinetic development of useable embryos progressing to blastocysts.
Walls ML; Ryan JP; Keelan JA; Hart R
Hum Reprod; 2015 Aug; 30(8):1842-9. PubMed ID: 26040479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective study of automated versus manual annotation of early time-lapse markers in the human preimplantation embryo.
Kaser DJ; Farland LV; Missmer SA; Racowsky C
Hum Reprod; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1604-1611. PubMed ID: 28854587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The higher the score, the better the clinical outcome: retrospective evaluation of automatic embryo grading as a support tool for embryo selection in IVF laboratories.
Bori L; Meseguer F; Valera MA; Galan A; Remohi J; Meseguer M
Hum Reprod; 2022 May; 37(6):1148-1160. PubMed ID: 35435210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Examining the efficacy of six published time-lapse imaging embryo selection algorithms to predict implantation to demonstrate the need for the development of specific, in-house morphokinetic selection algorithms.
Barrie A; Homburg R; McDowell G; Brown J; Kingsland C; Troup S
Fertil Steril; 2017 Mar; 107(3):613-621. PubMed ID: 28069186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perturbations of morphogenesis at the compaction stage affect blastocyst implantation and live birth rates.
Coticchio G; Ezoe K; Lagalla C; Shimazaki K; Ohata K; Ninomiya M; Wakabayashi N; Okimura T; Uchiyama K; Kato K; Borini A
Hum Reprod; 2021 Mar; 36(4):918-928. PubMed ID: 33575789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of implantation: a multicentric study to define and validate an algorithm for embryo selection.
Basile N; Vime P; Florensa M; Aparicio Ruiz B; García Velasco JA; Remohí J; Meseguer M
Hum Reprod; 2015 Feb; 30(2):276-83. PubMed ID: 25527613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts.
Capalbo A; Rienzi L; Cimadomo D; Maggiulli R; Elliott T; Wright G; Nagy ZP; Ubaldi FM
Hum Reprod; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1173-81. PubMed ID: 24578475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fertility and neonatal outcomes of embryos achieving blastulation on Day 7: are they of clinical value?
Du T; Wang Y; Fan Y; Zhang S; Yan Z; Yu W; Xi Q; Chen Q; Mol BW; Lyu Q; Kuang Y
Hum Reprod; 2018 Jun; 33(6):1038-1051. PubMed ID: 29669005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Timing of human preimplantation embryonic development is confounded by embryo origin.
Kirkegaard K; Sundvall L; Erlandsen M; Hindkjær JJ; Knudsen UB; Ingerslev HJ
Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):324-31. PubMed ID: 26637491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differences in gene expression profiles between human preimplantation embryos cultured in two different IVF culture media.
Kleijkers SH; Eijssen LM; Coonen E; Derhaag JG; Mantikou E; Jonker MJ; Mastenbroek S; Repping S; Evers JL; Dumoulin JC; van Montfoort AP
Hum Reprod; 2015 Oct; 30(10):2303-11. PubMed ID: 26202924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Embryologist agreement when assessing blastocyst implantation probability: is data-driven prediction the solution to embryo assessment subjectivity?
Fordham DE; Rosentraub D; Polsky AL; Aviram T; Wolf Y; Perl O; Devir A; Rosentraub S; Silver DH; Gold Zamir Y; Bronstein AM; Lara Lara M; Ben Nagi J; Alvarez A; Munné S
Hum Reprod; 2022 Sep; 37(10):2275-2290. PubMed ID: 35944167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Objective way to support embryo transfer: a probabilistic decision.
Gianaroli L; Magli MC; Gambardella L; Giusti A; Grugnetti C; Corani G
Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1210-20. PubMed ID: 23462389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A double-blind randomized controlled trial investigating a time-lapse algorithm for selecting Day 5 blastocysts for transfer.
Ahlström A; Lundin K; Lind AK; Gunnarsson K; Westlander G; Park H; Thurin-Kjellberg A; Thorsteinsdottir SA; Einarsson S; Åström M; Löfdahl K; Menezes J; Callender S; Nyberg C; Winerdal J; Stenfelt C; Jonassen BR; Oldereid N; Nolte L; Sundler M; Hardarson T
Hum Reprod; 2022 Apr; 37(4):708-717. PubMed ID: 35143661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
