BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27610583)

  • 1. Mammography Patient Information at Hospital Websites: Most Neither Comprehensible Nor Guideline Supported.
    Sadigh G; Singh K; Gilbert K; Khan R; Duszak AM; Duszak R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Nov; 207(5):947-951. PubMed ID: 27610583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Material on Websites of Breast Imaging Centers.
    Choudhery S; Xi Y; Chen H; Aboul-Fettouh N; Goldenmerry Y; Ho C; Viroslav H; Zhang C; Goudreau S
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2020 Oct; 17(10):1245-1251. PubMed ID: 32428435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can Patients Comprehend the Educational Materials that Hospitals Provide about Common IR Procedures?
    Sadigh G; Hawkins CM; O'Keefe JJ; Khan R; Duszak R
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2015 Aug; 26(8):1156-61. PubMed ID: 26074029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to mammography for breast cancer screening.
    AlKhalili R; Shukla PA; Patel RH; Sanghvi S; Hubbi B
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):290-5. PubMed ID: 25488695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Most American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' online patient education material exceeds average patient reading level.
    Eltorai AE; Sharma P; Wang J; Daniels AH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 473(4):1181-6. PubMed ID: 25475715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Readability of Online Patient Educational Materials Related to Breast Lesions Requiring Surgery.
    Miles RC; Baird GL; Choi P; Falomo E; Dibble EH; Garg M
    Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):112-118. PubMed ID: 30694156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Readability assessment of online ophthalmic patient information.
    Edmunds MR; Barry RJ; Denniston AK
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 131(12):1610-6. PubMed ID: 24178035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Will the Effect of New Federal Breast Density Legislation Be Diminished by Currently Available Online Patient Educational Materials?
    Miles RC; Choi P; Baird GL; Dibble EH; Lamb L; Garg M; Lehman C
    Acad Radiol; 2020 Oct; 27(10):1400-1405. PubMed ID: 31839567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Readability of spine-related patient education materials from subspecialty organization and spine practitioner websites.
    Vives M; Young L; Sabharwal S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(25):2826-31. PubMed ID: 19910867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Readability of websites containing information on dental implants.
    Jayaratne YS; Anderson NK; Zwahlen RA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Dec; 25(12):1319-24. PubMed ID: 24148074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiology Online Patient Education Materials Provided by Major University Hospitals: Do They Conform to NIH and AMA Guidelines?
    Prabhu AV; Donovan AL; Crihalmeanu T; Hansberry DR; Agarwal N; Beriwal S; Kale H; Heller M
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2018; 47(2):75-79. PubMed ID: 28669431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
    Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiation Oncology and Online Patient Education Materials: Deviating From NIH and AMA Recommendations.
    Prabhu AV; Hansberry DR; Agarwal N; Clump DA; Heron DE
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Nov; 96(3):521-8. PubMed ID: 27681748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Readability assessment of Internet-based patient education materials related to endoscopic sinus surgery.
    Cherla DV; Sanghvi S; Choudhry OJ; Liu JK; Eloy JA
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Aug; 122(8):1649-54. PubMed ID: 22685030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Readability of patient education materials on the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine website.
    Eltorai AE; Han A; Truntzer J; Daniels AH
    Phys Sportsmed; 2014 Nov; 42(4):125-30. PubMed ID: 25419896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Readability, suitability, and health content assessment of web-based patient education materials on colorectal cancer screening.
    Tian C; Champlin S; Mackert M; Lazard A; Agrawal D
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Aug; 80(2):284-90. PubMed ID: 24674352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving the readability of online foot and ankle patient education materials.
    Sheppard ED; Hyde Z; Florence MN; McGwin G; Kirchner JS; Ponce BA
    Foot Ankle Int; 2014 Dec; 35(12):1282-6. PubMed ID: 25239196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Readability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to IR.
    McEnteggart GE; Naeem M; Skierkowski D; Baird GL; Ahn SH; Soares G
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2015 Aug; 26(8):1164-8. PubMed ID: 25935147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Health literacy and the Internet: a study on the readability of Australian online health information.
    Cheng C; Dunn M
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2015 Aug; 39(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 25716142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative Readability Analysis of Online Patient Education Resources on Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.
    Gulati R; Nawaz M; Lam L; Pyrsopoulos NT
    Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017; 2017():3681989. PubMed ID: 28740843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.