738 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27611757)
1. Factors Influencing the Dimensional Accuracy of 3D-Printed Full-Coverage Dental Restorations Using Stereolithography Technology.
Alharbi N; Osman RB; Wismeijer D
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(5):503-10. PubMed ID: 27611757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Build Angle: Does It Influence the Accuracy of 3D-Printed Dental Restorations Using Digital Light-Processing Technology?
Osman RB; Alharbi N; Wismeijer D
Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(2):182-188. PubMed ID: 28267830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of the intaglio surface of 3D-printed hybrid resin-ceramic crowns, veneers and table-tops: An in vitro study.
Metin DS; Schmidt F; Beuer F; Prause E; Ashurko I; Sarmadi BS; Unkovskiy A
J Dent; 2024 May; 144():104960. PubMed ID: 38513937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trueness of stereolithography ZrO
Lee HB; Bea EJ; Lee WS; Kim JH
Dent Mater J; 2023 Jan; 42(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 36288942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Build angle effect on 3D-printed dental crowns marginal fit using digital light-processing and stereo-lithography technology: an in vitro study.
Farag E; Sabet A; Ebeid K; El Sergany O
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jan; 24(1):73. PubMed ID: 38212816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of intaglio surface trueness and margin quality of interim crowns in accordance with the build angle of stereolithography apparatus 3-dimensional printing.
Yu BY; Son K; Lee KB
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Aug; 126(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 32807402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microcomputed tomography evaluation of cement film thickness of veneers and crowns made with conventional and 3D printed provisional materials.
Sampaio CS; Niemann KD; Schweitzer DD; Hirata R; Atria PJ
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Apr; 33(3):487-495. PubMed ID: 32937028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel computer-aided method to fabricate a custom one-piece glass fiber dowel-and-core based on digitized impression and crown preparation data.
Chen Z; Li Y; Deng X; Wang X
J Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 23(4):276-83. PubMed ID: 24118182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of 3D Printed Models Created by Two Technologies of Printers with Different Designs of Model Base.
Rungrojwittayakul O; Kan JY; Shiozaki K; Swamidass RS; Goodacre BJ; Goodacre CJ; Lozada JL
J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 31498957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does build angle have an influence on surface roughness of anterior 3D-printed restorations? An in-vitro study.
Alharbi N; Osman RB
Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(4):505–510. PubMed ID: 33616553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of zirconia crown manufactured using stereolithography and digital light processing.
Lee HB; Noh MJ; Bae EJ; Lee WS; Kim JH
J Dent; 2024 Feb; 141():104834. PubMed ID: 38217958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional evaluation of marginal and internal fit of 3D-printed interim restorations fabricated on different finish line designs.
Alharbi N; Alharbi S; Cuijpers VMJI; Osman RB; Wismeijer D
J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Apr; 62(2):218-226. PubMed ID: 29032176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of abutment tooth geometry on the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining dental impressions.
Carbajal Mejía JB; Wakabayashi K; Nakamura T; Yatani H
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):392-399. PubMed ID: 28222873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 3D printed versus conventionally cured provisional crown and bridge dental materials.
Tahayeri A; Morgan M; Fugolin AP; Bompolaki D; Athirasala A; Pfeifer CS; Ferracane JL; Bertassoni LE
Dent Mater; 2018 Feb; 34(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 29110921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of CNC-milling on the marginal and internal fit of dental ceramics: a pilot study.
Schaefer O; Kuepper H; Thompson GA; Cachovan G; Hefti AF; Guentsch A
Dent Mater; 2013 Aug; 29(8):851-8. PubMed ID: 23743092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods.
Ng J; Ruse D; Wyatt C
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 24630399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro.
Schaefer O; Decker M; Wittstock F; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24508541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Accuracy of Fit of Crowns Made From Wax Patterns Produced Conventionally (Hand Formed) and Via CAD/CAM Technology.
Fathi HM; Al-Masoody AH; El-Ghezawi N; Johnson A
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2016 Mar; 24(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 27039473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
