269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27611759)
1. A Proposed Methodology to Assess the Accuracy of 3D Scanners and Casts and Monitor Tooth Wear Progression in Patients.
Ahmed KE; Whitters J; Ju X; Pierce SG; MacLeod CN; Murray CA
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(5):514-21. PubMed ID: 27611759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical Monitoring of Tooth Wear Progression in Patients over a Period of One Year Using CAD/CAM.
Ahmed KE; Whitters J; Ju X; Pierce SG; MacLeod CN; Murray CA
Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(2):153-155. PubMed ID: 28267825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantification of incisal tooth wear in upper anterior teeth: conventional vs new method using toolmakers microscope and a three-dimensional measuring technique.
Al-Omiri MK; Sghaireen MG; Alzarea BK; Lynch E
J Dent; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1214-21. PubMed ID: 24012517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantification of tooth wear: conventional vs new method using toolmakers microscope and a three-dimensional measuring technique.
Al-Omiri MK; Harb R; Abu Hammad OA; Lamey PJ; Lynch E; Clifford TJ
J Dent; 2010 Jul; 38(7):560-8. PubMed ID: 20381575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vivo measurements of tooth wear over 12 months.
Rodriguez JM; Austin RS; Bartlett DW
Caries Res; 2012; 46(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 22156738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues.
Gan N; Xiong Y; Jiao T
PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158800. PubMed ID: 27383409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision.
Ender A; Mehl A
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 23395338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
Caputi S; Varvara G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of three implant impression techniques with different impression materials and stones.
Chang WG; Vahidi F; Bae KH; Lim BS
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 22259795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional assessment of dental casts' occlusal surfaces using two impression materials.
Tarawneh FM; Panos PG; Athanasiou AE
J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Nov; 35(11):821-6. PubMed ID: 18482343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of early attrition using an ordinary flatbed scanner.
Van't Spijker A; Kreulen CM; Bronkhorst EM; Creugers NH
J Dent; 2012 Jul; 40(7):603-8. PubMed ID: 22504528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study.
Pujari M; Garg P; Prithviraj DR
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 24456531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement of the accuracy of dental working casts using a coordinate measuring machine.
Potran M; Štrbac B; Puškar T; Hadžistević M; Hodolič J; Trifković B
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2016 Oct; 73(10):895-903. PubMed ID: 29327892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
Hoods-Moonsammy VJ; Owen P; Howes DG
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of a 3D laser scanner using superimpositional software to assess the accuracy of impression techniques.
Shah S; Sundaram G; Bartlett D; Sherriff M
J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):653-8. PubMed ID: 15476960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of the progression of tooth wear on dental casts.
Vervoorn-Vis GM; Wetselaar P; Koutris M; Visscher CM; Evälahti M; Ahlberg J; Lobbezoo F
J Oral Rehabil; 2015 Aug; 42(8):600-4. PubMed ID: 25752246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy and precision of 3 intraoral scanners and accuracy of conventional impressions: A novel in vivo analysis method.
Nedelcu R; Olsson P; Nyström I; Rydén J; Thor A
J Dent; 2018 Feb; 69():110-118. PubMed ID: 29246490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative comparison of incisal tooth wear in patients receiving one-phase or two-phase treatment for skeletal Class III malocclusion with anterior crossbite.
Jang SJ; Choi DS; Jang I; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Cha BK
Angle Orthod; 2018 Mar; 88(2):151-156. PubMed ID: 29257705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Qualitative and quantitative three-dimensional accuracy of a single tooth captured by elastomeric impression materials: an in vitro study.
Schaefer O; Schmidt M; Goebel R; Kuepper H
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 22944312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
