122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27611872)
1. Technoeconomic Assessment of an Advanced Aqueous Ammonia-Based Postcombustion Capture Process Integrated with a 650-MW Coal-Fired Power Station.
Li K; Yu H; Yan S; Feron P; Wardhaugh L; Tade M
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Oct; 50(19):10746-10755. PubMed ID: 27611872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Technical and Energy Performance of an Advanced, Aqueous Ammonia-Based CO2 Capture Technology for a 500 MW Coal-Fired Power Station.
Li K; Yu H; Feron P; Tade M; Wardhaugh L
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Aug; 49(16):10243-52. PubMed ID: 26208135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Achieving Zero/Negative-Emissions Coal-Fired Power Plants Using Amine-Based Postcombustion CO
Jiang K; Feron P; Cousins A; Zhai R; Li K
Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Feb; 54(4):2429-2438. PubMed ID: 31990528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Techno-economic assessment of polymer membrane systems for postcombustion carbon capture at coal-fired power plants.
Zhai H; Rubin ES
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Mar; 47(6):3006-14. PubMed ID: 23406504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Opportunities for Decarbonizing Existing U.S. Coal-Fired Power Plants via CO2 Capture, Utilization and Storage.
Zhai H; Ou Y; Rubin ES
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(13):7571-9. PubMed ID: 26023722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of the US EPA's determination of the role for CO2 capture and storage in new fossil fuel-fired power plants.
Clark VR; Herzog HJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 48(14):7723-9. PubMed ID: 24960207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Techno-Economic Assessment of Hybrid Cooling Systems for Coal- and Natural-Gas-Fired Power Plants with and without Carbon Capture and Storage.
Zhai H; Rubin ES
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Apr; 50(7):4127-34. PubMed ID: 26967583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Should a coal-fired power plant be replaced or retrofitted?
Patiño-Echeverri D; Morel B; Apt J; Chen C
Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Dec; 41(23):7980-6. PubMed ID: 18186326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost structure of a postcombustion CO2 capture system using CaO.
Abanades JC; Grasa G; Alonso M; Rodriguez N; Anthony EJ; Romeo LM
Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Aug; 41(15):5523-7. PubMed ID: 17822127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reassessing the Efficiency Penalty from Carbon Capture in Coal-Fired Power Plants.
Supekar SD; Skerlos SJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Oct; 49(20):12576-84. PubMed ID: 26422409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Process modeling of an advanced NH₃ abatement and recycling technology in the ammonia-based CO₂ capture process.
Li K; Yu H; Tade M; Feron P; Yu J; Wang S
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jun; 48(12):7179-86. PubMed ID: 24850444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Life Cycle Assessment Case Study of Coal-Fired Electricity Generation with Humidity Swing Direct Air Capture of CO
van der Giesen C; Meinrenken CJ; Kleijn R; Sprecher B; Lackner KS; Kramer GJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Jan; 51(2):1024-1034. PubMed ID: 27935700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. State-level infrastructure and economic effects of switchgrass cofiring with coal in existing power plants for carbon mitigation.
Morrow WR; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Oct; 41(19):6657-62. PubMed ID: 17969677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Water use at pulverized coal power plants with postcombustion carbon capture and storage.
Zhai H; Rubin ES; Versteeg PL
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2479-85. PubMed ID: 21329343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implications of the recent reductions in natural gas prices for emissions of CO2 from the US power sector.
Lu X; Salovaara J; McElroy MB
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(5):3014-21. PubMed ID: 22321206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Postcombustion Capture or Direct Air Capture in Decarbonizing US Natural Gas Power?
Azarabadi H; Lackner KS
Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Apr; 54(8):5102-5111. PubMed ID: 32212696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A technical, economic, and environmental assessment of amine-based CO2 capture technology for power plant greenhouse gas control.
Rao AB; Rubin ES
Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Oct; 36(20):4467-75. PubMed ID: 12387425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Economic Merits of Flexible Carbon Capture and Sequestration as a Compliance Strategy with the Clean Power Plan.
Craig MT; Jaramillo P; Zhai H; Klima K
Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Feb; 51(3):1102-1109. PubMed ID: 28001378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Systems Analysis of Physical Absorption of CO
Zhai H; Rubin ES
Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Apr; 52(8):4996-5004. PubMed ID: 29589925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Baseload coal investment decisions under uncertain carbon legislation.
Bergerson JA; Lave LB
Environ Sci Technol; 2007 May; 41(10):3431-6. PubMed ID: 17547159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
