183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27612522)
1. Induction of labour for postdates in nulliparous women with uncomplicated pregnancy - is the caesarean section rate really lower?
Mahomed K; Pungsornruk K; Gibbons K
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Oct; 36(7):916-920. PubMed ID: 27612522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Caesarean section following induction of labour in uncomplicated first births- a population-based cross-sectional analysis of 42,950 births.
Davey MA; King J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Apr; 16():92. PubMed ID: 27121614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes of elective labour induction and elective caesarean section in low-risk pregnancies between 37 and 41 weeks' gestation.
Dunne C; Da Silva O; Schmidt G; Natale R
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2009 Dec; 31(12):1124-30. PubMed ID: 20085677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Earlier induction of labour in post term pregnancies--A historical cohort study.
Kjeldsen LL; Sindberg M; Maimburg RD
Midwifery; 2015 May; 31(5):526-31. PubMed ID: 25726005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Variation in hospital caesarean section rates and obstetric outcomes among nulliparae at term: a population-based cohort study.
Nippita TA; Lee YY; Patterson JA; Ford JB; Morris JM; Nicholl MC; Roberts CL
BJOG; 2015 Apr; 122(5):702-11. PubMed ID: 25605625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Induction at 41 weeks increases the risk of caesarean section in a hospital with a low rate of caesarean sections.
Burgos J; Rodríguez L; Otero B; Cobos P; Osuna C; Centeno Mdel M; Melchor JC; Fernández-Llebrez L; Martínez-Astorquiza T
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Sep; 25(9):1716-8. PubMed ID: 22339273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Induction of labour versus expectant management for nulliparous women over 35 years of age: a multi-centre prospective, randomised controlled trial.
Walker KF; Bugg G; Macpherson M; McCormick C; Wildsmith C; Smith G; Thornton J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2012 Dec; 12():145. PubMed ID: 23231750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Induction of twin pregnancy and the risk of caesarean delivery: a cohort study.
Jonsson M
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Jun; 15():136. PubMed ID: 26077416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pregnancies past the estimated date of confinement: labour and delivery outcome.
Al-Taani M
East Mediterr Health J; 2003; 9(5-6):955-60. PubMed ID: 16450525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of change in a labour management protocol on caesarean section rate in nulliparous women.
Kuppens SMI; Brugman A; Hasaart THM; Hutton EK; Pop VJM
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Jun; 35(6):508-514. PubMed ID: 23870774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does routine induction of labour at 41 weeks really reduce the rate of caesarean section compared with expectant management?
Pavicic H; Hamelin K; Menticoglou SM
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2009 Jul; 31(7):621-626. PubMed ID: 19761635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of timing of admission in labour and management of labour on method of birth: results from a randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery (COSMOS trial).
Davey MA; McLachlan HL; Forster D; Flood M
Midwifery; 2013 Dec; 29(12):1297-302. PubMed ID: 23890679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Management of Foley catheter induction among nulliparous women: a retrospective study.
Kruit H; Heikinheimo O; Ulander VM; Aitokallio-Tallberg A; Nupponen I; Paavonen J; Rahkonen L
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Oct; 15():276. PubMed ID: 26508361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Induction of labor and the risk for emergency cesarean section in nulliparous and multiparous women.
Thorsell M; Lyrenäs S; Andolf E; Kaijser M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2011 Oct; 90(10):1094-9. PubMed ID: 21679162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Birth Outcomes for Midwifery Clients Who Begin Postdates Induction of Labour Under Midwifery Care Compared With Those Who Are Transferred to Obstetrical Care.
Elderhorst E; Ahmed RJ; Hutton EK; Darling EK
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Oct; 41(10):1444-1452. PubMed ID: 30712906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Elective induction of labour increases caesarean section rate in low risk multiparous women.
Jacquemyn Y; Michiels I; Martens G
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Apr; 32(3):257-9. PubMed ID: 22369399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Induction of labour versus expectant management at term by subgroups of maternal age: an individual patient data meta-analysis.
Walker KF; Malin G; Wilson P; Thornton JG
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Feb; 197():1-5. PubMed ID: 26686589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of induction of labour and expectant management in postterm pregnancy: a matched cohort study.
Hermus MAA; Verhoeven CJM; Mol BW; de Wolf GS; Fiedeldeij CA
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2009; 54(5):351-356. PubMed ID: 19720335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing expectant management and spontaneous labor approaches in studying the effect of labor induction on cesarean delivery.
Danilack VA; Triche EW; Dore DD; Muri JH; Phipps MG; Savitz DA
Ann Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):405-411.e1. PubMed ID: 27211604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perinatal mortality associated with induction of labour versus expectant management in nulliparous women aged 35 years or over: An English national cohort study.
Knight HE; Cromwell DA; Gurol-Urganci I; Harron K; van der Meulen JH; Smith GCS
PLoS Med; 2017 Nov; 14(11):e1002425. PubMed ID: 29136007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
