BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

360 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27612595)

  • 1. Changes in HbA
    Kim KT; Cho DC; Sung JK; Kim CH; Kang H; Kim DH
    Spine J; 2017 Feb; 17(2):203-210. PubMed ID: 27612595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Indirect effects of decompression surgery on glycemic homeostasis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kim HJ; Lee KW; Cho HG; Kang KT; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS
    Spine J; 2015 Jan; 15(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 24983668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
    Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
    Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical outcome of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression in treatment of elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a matched retrospective study.
    Wang L; Wang T; Fan N; Yuan S; Du P; Si F; Wang A; Zang L
    Int Orthop; 2024 Jan; 48(1):201-209. PubMed ID: 37632530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are There Differences Between Patients with Extreme Stenosis and Non-extreme Stenosis in Terms of Pain, Function or Complications After Spinal Decompression Using a Tubular Retractor System?
    Kulkarni AG; Das S; Kunder TS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Feb; 478(2):348-356. PubMed ID: 31633587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Central sensitization as a predictive factor for the surgical outcome in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter prospective study.
    Akeda K; Yamada J; Takegami N; Fujiwara T; Murata K; Kono T; Sudo T; Imanishi T; Kurata T; Kawakita E; Sakakibara T; Kondo T; Takegami K; Sato M; Sudo A
    Eur Spine J; 2023 Dec; 32(12):4200-4209. PubMed ID: 37010610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of pain sensitivity on surgical outcomes after lumbar spine surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kim HJ; Lee JI; Kang KT; Chang BS; Lee CK; Ruscheweyh R; Kang SS; Yeom JS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Feb; 40(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 25384051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in vitamin D status after surgery in female patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and its clinical significance.
    Kim TH; Yoon JY; Lee BH; Jung HS; Park MS; Park JO; Moon ES; Kim HS; Lee HM; Moon SH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(21):E1326-30. PubMed ID: 22805343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study with 2-year follow-up to compare the performance of decompression with and without interlaminar stabilization.
    Schmidt S; Franke J; Rauschmann M; Adelt D; Bonsanto MM; Sola S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Apr; 28(4):406-415. PubMed ID: 29372860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differentiation of pain-related functional limitations in surgical patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) using the Oswestry Disability Index: a Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) study.
    Charalampidis A; Canizares M; Kalsi PS; Hung Wu P; Johnson M; Soroceanu A; Nataraj A; Glennie A; Rasoulinejad P; Attabib N; Hall H; Fisher C; Thomas K; Rampersaud YR
    Spine J; 2022 Apr; 22(4):578-586. PubMed ID: 34699999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tubular surgery with the assistance of endoscopic surgery via a paramedian or midline approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis at the L4/5 level.
    Komatsu J; Muta T; Nagura N; Iwabuchi M; Fukuda H; Kaneko K; Shirado O
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2018; 26(2):2309499018782546. PubMed ID: 29938605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of obesity on complications and outcomes: a comparison of fusion and nonfusion lumbar spine surgery.
    Onyekwelu I; Glassman SD; Asher AL; Shaffrey CI; Mummaneni PV; Carreon LY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):158-162. PubMed ID: 27740396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis without coronal imbalance.
    Hikata T; Watanabe K; Fujita N; Iwanami A; Hosogane N; Ishii K; Nakamura M; Toyama Y; Matsumoto M
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Oct; 23(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 26140404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of catastrophising on treatment outcomes after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kim HJ; Park JW; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS
    Bone Joint J; 2015 Nov; 97-B(11):1546-54. PubMed ID: 26530659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preoperative Predictors of Better Long-term Functional Ability and Decreased Pain Following LSS Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study with a 10-year Follow-up Period.
    Tuomainen I; Pesonen J; Rade M; Pakarinen M; Leinonen V; Kröger H; Airaksinen O; Aalto T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Jun; 45(11):776-783. PubMed ID: 31923129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates.
    Alimi M; Hofstetter CP; Pyo SY; Paulo D; Härtl R
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):339-52. PubMed ID: 25635635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic decompression compared with open decompression and fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: protocol for a multicenter, prospective, cohort study.
    Zhai S; Zhao W; Zhu B; Huang X; Liang C; Hai B; Ding L; Zhu H; Wang X; Wei F; Chu H; Liu X
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 May; 23(1):502. PubMed ID: 35624443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Outcomes and Complications of Surgical Treatment for LSS at 1-Year Follow-up - Prospective Study].
    Ježek J; Waldauf P; Krbec M; Douša P; Skála-Rosenbaum J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2019; 86(4):256-263. PubMed ID: 31524586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preoperative Zung Depression Scale predicts outcome after revision lumbar surgery for adjacent segment disease, recurrent stenosis, and pseudarthrosis.
    Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Aaronson OS; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2012 Mar; 12(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 21937282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is There an Association Between Radiological Severity of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Disability, Pain, or Surgical Outcome?: A Multicenter Observational Study.
    Weber C; Giannadakis C; Rao V; Jakola AS; Nerland U; Nygaard ØP; Solberg TK; Gulati S; Solheim O
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):E78-83. PubMed ID: 26352747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.