These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27612595)

  • 1. Changes in HbA
    Kim KT; Cho DC; Sung JK; Kim CH; Kang H; Kim DH
    Spine J; 2017 Feb; 17(2):203-210. PubMed ID: 27612595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Indirect effects of decompression surgery on glycemic homeostasis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kim HJ; Lee KW; Cho HG; Kang KT; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS
    Spine J; 2015 Jan; 15(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 24983668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
    Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
    Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical outcome of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression in treatment of elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a matched retrospective study.
    Wang L; Wang T; Fan N; Yuan S; Du P; Si F; Wang A; Zang L
    Int Orthop; 2024 Jan; 48(1):201-209. PubMed ID: 37632530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are There Differences Between Patients with Extreme Stenosis and Non-extreme Stenosis in Terms of Pain, Function or Complications After Spinal Decompression Using a Tubular Retractor System?
    Kulkarni AG; Das S; Kunder TS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Feb; 478(2):348-356. PubMed ID: 31633587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Central sensitization as a predictive factor for the surgical outcome in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter prospective study.
    Akeda K; Yamada J; Takegami N; Fujiwara T; Murata K; Kono T; Sudo T; Imanishi T; Kurata T; Kawakita E; Sakakibara T; Kondo T; Takegami K; Sato M; Sudo A
    Eur Spine J; 2023 Dec; 32(12):4200-4209. PubMed ID: 37010610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of pain sensitivity on surgical outcomes after lumbar spine surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kim HJ; Lee JI; Kang KT; Chang BS; Lee CK; Ruscheweyh R; Kang SS; Yeom JS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Feb; 40(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 25384051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in vitamin D status after surgery in female patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and its clinical significance.
    Kim TH; Yoon JY; Lee BH; Jung HS; Park MS; Park JO; Moon ES; Kim HS; Lee HM; Moon SH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(21):E1326-30. PubMed ID: 22805343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study with 2-year follow-up to compare the performance of decompression with and without interlaminar stabilization.
    Schmidt S; Franke J; Rauschmann M; Adelt D; Bonsanto MM; Sola S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Apr; 28(4):406-415. PubMed ID: 29372860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differentiation of pain-related functional limitations in surgical patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) using the Oswestry Disability Index: a Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) study.
    Charalampidis A; Canizares M; Kalsi PS; Hung Wu P; Johnson M; Soroceanu A; Nataraj A; Glennie A; Rasoulinejad P; Attabib N; Hall H; Fisher C; Thomas K; Rampersaud YR
    Spine J; 2022 Apr; 22(4):578-586. PubMed ID: 34699999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tubular surgery with the assistance of endoscopic surgery via a paramedian or midline approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis at the L4/5 level.
    Komatsu J; Muta T; Nagura N; Iwabuchi M; Fukuda H; Kaneko K; Shirado O
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2018; 26(2):2309499018782546. PubMed ID: 29938605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of obesity on complications and outcomes: a comparison of fusion and nonfusion lumbar spine surgery.
    Onyekwelu I; Glassman SD; Asher AL; Shaffrey CI; Mummaneni PV; Carreon LY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):158-162. PubMed ID: 27740396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis without coronal imbalance.
    Hikata T; Watanabe K; Fujita N; Iwanami A; Hosogane N; Ishii K; Nakamura M; Toyama Y; Matsumoto M
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Oct; 23(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 26140404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of catastrophising on treatment outcomes after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kim HJ; Park JW; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS
    Bone Joint J; 2015 Nov; 97-B(11):1546-54. PubMed ID: 26530659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preoperative Predictors of Better Long-term Functional Ability and Decreased Pain Following LSS Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study with a 10-year Follow-up Period.
    Tuomainen I; Pesonen J; Rade M; Pakarinen M; Leinonen V; Kröger H; Airaksinen O; Aalto T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Jun; 45(11):776-783. PubMed ID: 31923129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates.
    Alimi M; Hofstetter CP; Pyo SY; Paulo D; Härtl R
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):339-52. PubMed ID: 25635635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic decompression compared with open decompression and fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: protocol for a multicenter, prospective, cohort study.
    Zhai S; Zhao W; Zhu B; Huang X; Liang C; Hai B; Ding L; Zhu H; Wang X; Wei F; Chu H; Liu X
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 May; 23(1):502. PubMed ID: 35624443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Outcomes and Complications of Surgical Treatment for LSS at 1-Year Follow-up - Prospective Study].
    Ježek J; Waldauf P; Krbec M; Douša P; Skála-Rosenbaum J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2019; 86(4):256-263. PubMed ID: 31524586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preoperative Zung Depression Scale predicts outcome after revision lumbar surgery for adjacent segment disease, recurrent stenosis, and pseudarthrosis.
    Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Aaronson OS; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2012 Mar; 12(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 21937282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is There an Association Between Radiological Severity of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Disability, Pain, or Surgical Outcome?: A Multicenter Observational Study.
    Weber C; Giannadakis C; Rao V; Jakola AS; Nerland U; Nygaard ØP; Solberg TK; Gulati S; Solheim O
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):E78-83. PubMed ID: 26352747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.